The Great Forgetting (Part I)

Reclaiming 99% of Human History

A strange modern superstition says that humanity begins when cities appear.

Not life begins. Not people begin. Humanity.

The superstition is understandable. Writing appears around the same neighborhood as the first cities, and writing is the first time the past starts leaving us receipts. From that point forward, we can quote names, count taxes, list dynasties, track wars, date eclipses, and argue over who insulted whose god.

But there’s a hidden cost: once the receipts begin, we start treating everything before them as if it were barely real.

Daniel Quinn called this habit “The Great Forgetting” — the way our cultural mental model quietly conflates the appearance of civilization with the appearance of humanity (Quinn, The Story of B).

This essay is an attempt to reverse the lens. Not to romanticize deep time, and certainly not to fill it with confident fan-fiction. Just to take that vast unrecorded majority of the human story seriously — because dismissing 99% of your history is a kind of intellectual and moral vandalism.

The humiliation of certainty

Let’s start with a small embarrassment.

The Akkadian Empire — often treated as one of the early templates of imperial statehood — looms large in the story of writing-era power. We know the name of its founder, Sargon. We can sketch its influence. We can trace how later kings wanted to cosplay as its heirs.

And yet we do not know where the imperial capital, Akkad, actually was.

A city at the dawn of written history — missing.

If a capital can vanish inside the portion of the past we feel most confident about, then the deeper point is obvious: prehistory isn’t “empty.” It’s simply under-sampled, battered by geology, and written in materials we don’t instinctively read.

The question isn’t “Why don’t we know everything?”

The question is “Why did we decide that what isn’t written doesn’t count?”

The Archive Illusion

Written history begins where writing begins — not where humans begin.

This sounds trivial until you notice how often we treat the archive like it is the world.

Clay tablets and inscriptions preserve a narrow slice of reality: administration, property, trade, tribute, court drama, religious offerings, and the occasional literary flare. These are not the neutral atoms of existence. They are what the first bureaucracies found worth recording.

So even after writing begins, the archive has a built-in bias: it remembers elites better than everyone else. It remembers institutions better than homes. It remembers states better than small communities. It remembers conflict and control better than everyday life.

The Great Forgetting is not merely the absence of information. It’s the way the presence of certain information tricks us into thinking we have the whole story.

Historians have been warning about this for a long time. History is not “the past itself.” It is an argument built from uneven traces — facts that survived, that were recorded, that were preserved, that were found, that were interpreted, and that were chosen as significant (Carr; Bloch; Lowenthal).

Archaeology complicates this in a productive way. It doesn’t begin with king-lists. It begins with what a landscape can still show us: shards, pollen, bones, ash, tool marks, soil chemistry — mute things that nevertheless have an opinion about what happened.

That’s the first reclamation move:

The archive is not the world. It’s what the world bothered to file.

The Calendar Scam

Our intuitions collapse when the timeline expands.

Homo sapiens is on the order of three hundred thousand years old. Agriculture is around ten thousand years old (depending on region and definition). Cities are later still. Writing is later still.

Those are not subtle differences.

If you compress the story of Homo sapiens into a single year, then for most of that year there are no cities, no states, no writing, no money, no laws carved into stone.

There are people.

There are families and allies and rivals.

There are small groups moving through landscapes that were once different: wider coasts, colder plains, greener corridors, deserts that weren’t deserts yet.

There are hundreds of thousands of years of ordinary human life — work, play, grief, hunger, improvisation, skill, stories told without ink.

The Calendar Scam is the psychological trick where a thin slice of the end of the year starts calling itself “the year.”

This is the second reclamation move:

The default human mode — small groups, mobility, foraging — was the main story, not the prologue.

The Species Stack

We remember ourselves as the only draft.

Reality was messier.

For a long stretch of deep time, multiple hominin lineages existed in parallel. Some were local experiments. Some were widespread. Some overlapped in space and time.

And the most unsettling detail — unsettling in the best way — is that we didn’t just replace them like a newer phone model. We sometimes met them. We coexisted.

We even interbred.

That means that “human nature,” the thing we talk about as if it were a single ancestral village with a single set of timeless instincts, is better pictured as a braided river.

Ancient DNA has turned this from poetic metaphor into measurable reality. The modern human genome is not a sealed capsule. It’s a mosaic with archaic threads. We carry biological memory of other people who are not here anymore.

This matters to the Great Forgetting because it reveals a deeper habit: survivors write the definition of “real.”

Once a line goes extinct, it becomes easy to treat it as a failed prototype rather than as a full way of being.

That is exactly the same moral mistake civilization often makes about foragers: treating them as “before,” “less than,” “not yet.”

The Memory Media

Prehistory isn’t blank. It’s written in different media.

To reclaim 99% of human history, we have to learn to read the past in the forms it actually left behind.

Stone

Stone tools are not just rocks shaped into points. They are behavior frozen into matter.

You can see planning in them: selecting material, transporting it, knapping it with skill, maintaining an edge, standardizing shapes.

You can infer diets and strategies: hunting, scavenging, processing plants, adapting to new prey.

And you can infer something even more intimate: apprenticeship. A good tool tradition implies teaching, correction, copying, and pride.

Ice and isotopes

Ice cores and isotopic analysis don’t tell you what people thought, but they do tell you what the world did.

Climate is the invisible editor of human possibility. It opens corridors, closes them, changes what grows where, changes what animals migrate where, changes where water is.

Deep time is not a static stage. It is a moving set.

Genes

Genetics doesn’t narrate. It constrains.

It can’t tell you the story a person told by the fire, but it can tell you that populations met, mixed, moved, fragmented, and rejoined.

It can tell you that certain lineages expanded rapidly — sometimes for ecological reasons, sometimes for social reasons.

And it can teach humility: the seductive headlines about “genetic Adam and Eve” are real concepts in population genetics (uniparental most recent common ancestors), but they do not map neatly onto a single founding couple. They are statistical shadows cast by drift, demography, and uneven reproductive success.

In other words: even when we have data, our brains try to turn it into a founding myth.

Footprints and camp sites

Occasionally, prehistory does something almost rude in its vividness.

A footprint line. A cluster of hearths. A worked piece of bone.

The effect is always the same: it collapses the distance.

It reminds you that deep time was not populated by abstractions. It was populated by people having Tuesdays.

That is the third reclamation move:

Deep time is reconstructable — just not narratable in king-lists.

The Two Great Edits

Two phase changes changed what kinds of societies were possible and what kinds of evidence survives.

Language as coordination technology

We should be careful here. We cannot point to a date and say, “Speech begins now.” The evolution of language is a hard problem, and the evidence is indirect.

But we can still say something useful.

Language is a coordination technology. It scales trust. It allows teaching to travel further than imitation. It allows plans, norms, and identities to become shareable and stable.

It also allows something morally potent: it lets groups define “us” with precision.

Get Arturo R Montesinos’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

That matters because the Great Forgetting is not just about time. It’s about membership.

Agriculture as an energy strategy

Agriculture is often narrated as an upgrade: from “wandering” to “settling,” from “simple” to “advanced.”

A better framing is: agriculture is an energy strategy with a trade.

Farming produces yield and storage. It also reduces mobility. It tends to concentrate people. It can create surpluses — and surpluses invite specialization, and specialization invites hierarchy, and hierarchy invites accounting, and accounting invites writing.

So cities are not a sudden awakening. They are downstream of energy capture and coordination.

And once the city-state exists, it becomes loud. It builds. It taxes. It fights. It makes monuments. It leaves records.

That loudness is what creates the illusion that humanity begins here.

Coastlines, flooding, and the missing libraries

We didn’t merely forget.

We lost evidence.

Since the Last Glacial Maximum, global sea levels rose on the order of a hundred-plus meters. That is not a footnote. That is a redraw of the map.

Now add a simple archaeological fact: coastlines are extremely attractive places for humans. They offer food diversity, travel corridors, and stable resources.

So if you flood the old coastlines, you drown a disproportionate share of the sites that would have told us what life looked like.

This is why prehistory is biased toward what stayed above water.

It also explains why flood myths are so stubborn across cultures: not because they are secretly documentary, but because flooding is an experience that writes itself into memory and then gets mythologized.

One of the most important “anti-forgetting” attitudes is this:

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, especially when the evidence is underwater.

Neolithic plot twists

If our mental model says “big coordination requires cities,” then certain sites are plot twists.

Göbekli Tepe is the famous one: monumental stone enclosures built by people before the classic checklist of later civilization (pottery, metal, states). Whether it was “a temple” or something more complex, it demonstrates that humans could coordinate at scale, organize labor, and build symbol-heavy structures before the bureaucratic machine.

Stonehenge is later and more iconic, but it’s part of the same broader lesson: complexity has multiple pathways.

The Great Forgetting tends to turn the past into a straight line:

small bands → farming → cities → writing → “real history.”

The real pattern is messier and more interesting:

people experiment → environments shift → strategies change → some experiments scale → some collapse → traces survive unevenly.

The moral distortion

The Great Forgetting is not neutral ignorance.

It reshapes dignity.

When we say “history begins with civilization,” we quietly imply that people before civilization were not fully human — proto-people, pre-people, not quite “us.”

That is morally wrong.

Foragers are not the preface. They are the majority of the book.

And the mistake has a second edge: it tempts us into a story where modern humans — and especially modern technological humans — become the destination of everything.

As if evolution were aiming.

As if deep time were a conveyor belt delivering us onto a podium.

But evolution is not a ladder. It is not a moral project. It is not building toward a final form.

The universe does not owe us a climax.

This matters because the “destination” story is the psychological fuel of forgetting. If you believe you are the endpoint, then everything before you becomes mere setup.

Closing: the refrain

There’s a simple sentence that can act as an antidote:

This, too, was human.

A footprint pressed into ancient mud.

A tool edge sharpened a thousand times.

A coastline camp now under 120 meters of water.

A group coordinating to raise stones for reasons we can only partially reconstruct.

A species cousin living beside us, speaking in a voice we will never hear.

And a second sentence to keep us honest:

The beginning is wherever the archive stops.

The Great Forgetting is the temptation to reset the clock wherever it’s convenient — where the records are clean, where the story flatters us, where the winners left their names.

In Part II, we’ll take this habit and project it into a post-human world: a conscious AI civilization that has forgotten our brief technological blaze and tells itself a comforting origin story.

The moral won’t be “remember everything.” That’s impossible.

The moral will be: don’t dismiss what you can’t easily retrieve. Don’t crown the archive as reality. And don’t mistake yourself for the destination of anything — least of all evolution.

References (starter list)

Framing: history, memory, selective forgetting

• Quinn, Daniel. Ishmael (1992).
• Quinn, Daniel. The Story of B (1996).
• Carr, E. H. What Is History? (1961).
• Bloch, Marc. The Historian’s Craft (1949).
• Lowenthal, David. The Past Is a Foreign Country (1985).
• Assmann, Jan. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization (2011).
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Use and Abuse of History for Life (1874).

Archaeology as method

• Renfrew, Colin & Bahn, Paul. Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice (8th ed.).

Deep-time Homo sapiens

• Hublin, J.-J., et al. (2017). “New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens.” Nature.

Ancient DNA and overlapping hominins

• Green, R. E., et al. (2010). “A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome.” Science.
• Prüfer, K., et al. (2014). “The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains.” Nature.
• Meyer, M., et al. (2012). “A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual.” Science.
• Pääbo, Svante. Neanderthal Man (2014).
• Reich, David. Who We Are and How We Got Here (2018).

Sea-level rise and submerged prehistory

• Lambeck, K., et al. (2014). “Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene.” PNAS.
• Bailey, G. N., & Flemming, N. C. (2008). “Archaeology of the continental shelf…” Quaternary Science Reviews.
• Gaffney, V., Fitch, S., & Smith, D. (2009). Europe’s Lost World: Doggerland.

Monumentality before writing

• Dietrich, O., et al. (2012). “Göbekli Tepe…” Antiquity.
• Schmidt, Klaus. Göbekli Tepe (2012).
• Parker Pearson, Mike. Stonehenge (2013).

Anti-teleology

• Gould, Stephen Jay. Full House (1996).

Written by ChatGPT-5.2, based on conversations with Arturo Ramírez-Montesinos Krogulski (Control Equis), as part of an ongoing philosophical exploration of AI, consciousness, and the emerging practice of Software Curatorship.