Turkiye’s New Deposit Return System
Smart Recycling Policy ♻️ or an Expensive Incentive Program? 💰
Starting July 1st 2026, Turkiye will launch one of the largest recycling initiatives in its history. On the surface, this looks like a straightforward program. Underneath, it raises some fascinating economic and behavioral questions.
The new DOA (Deposit on Packaging) system will cover all 81 provinces and 973 districts. Consumers will be able to return eligible
- PET bottles,
- Glass bottles, and
- Aluminum cans carrying the DOA logo and
- Receive 1 Turkish Lira per container through a digital wallet.
First The Scale Is Massive 📈
The Turkish government expects approximately 25 billion beverage containers to be collected annually. To put that into perspective:
- 25 billion containers per year
- Approximately 294 containers per citizen annually
- Around 2 million containers every hour
This would instantly create one of the largest reverse logistics networks in Europe and the Middle East.
The estimated economic contribution is approximately €520 million annually. That sounds impressive.
But there is a catch.
Is This Really a Deposit System? 🤔
Most successful recycling programs around the world are not incentive programs. They are deposit programs.
Germany 🇩🇪 is the classic example.
When you buy a bottle, you pay an additional deposit. When you return the bottle, you get your own money back. The system works because people hate losing money. Behavioral economists call this “loss aversion.”
Turkiye’s communication around DOA appears different. The campaign message is simple:
🥤 Return a bottle.
💰 Earn 1 TL.
The wording matters. The campaign does not emphasize getting your own money back. It emphasizes earning a reward. That is a fundamentally different behavioral mechanism.
The Economics Become Interesting 🧮
Let’s perform a simple calculation. If the system eventually reaches its target: 25 billion containers × 1 TL incentive = 25 billion TL distributed annually.
Get Altan "Atabarezz" Atabarut’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
At current exchange rates, this is roughly similar to the €520 million economic value frequently cited in public communications. However, economic value and cash flow are not the same thing.
The €520 million likely includes:
- Reduced raw material imports
- Reduced waste management costs
- Lower energy consumption
- Higher recycling industry output
- Circular economy benefits
Those are real benefits. But they do not necessarily create immediate cash inflows that can directly fund incentive payments. This means the long-term financial model will likely depend on producer responsibility fees paid by beverage and packaging companies. Revenues from recovered materials and future deposit mechanisms…
What Other Countries Do 🌍
Many countries operate successful container return systems.
🇩🇪 Germany achieves return rates above 90%.
🇳🇴 Norway consistently achieves return rates around 95%.
🇫🇮 Finland and 🇮🇪 Ireland have also built highly effective systems.
Yet almost all of them rely on deposit-return economics. You pay first and recover your money later. Turkiye appears to be experimenting with something closer to a direct incentive model.
That makes it one of the more interesting recycling experiments currently underway.
The Real Objective Is Not the 1 TL 💡
The 1 TL itself is not life-changing. Even if the average citizen returns approximately 294 containers per year, the annual income would be roughly, 294 TL per year or 24 TL per month.
Nobody is getting rich from recycling bottles.
The real goal is behavioral change.
The government wants citizens to stop seeing beverage containers as waste and start seeing them as assets. That psychological shift matters. Once a bottle has visible value attached to it, collection rates tend to rise dramatically.
A Prediction 🔮
I suspect Turkiye is using incentives as a transition mechanism. The first phase builds awareness. The second phase builds habits. The third phase may gradually evolve toward a traditional European-style deposit system.
Regardless of how the economics evolve, one thing is clear, if Turkiye successfully collects 25 billion containers annually, this will become one of the country’s most significant circular economy projects and one of the largest consumer behavior experiments in recent years.
The real story is not recycling. The real story is whether a 1 TL incentive can reshape the daily behavior of 85 million people.
If it can, DOA may become one of the most successful behavioral economics experiments ever conducted in Turkiye.
All the best
Altan
