Sitemap
Josh Roybal

Josh Roybal

Husband and Dad.. AI Powered Generalist.

The Beautiful Ones

6 min readFeb 23, 2026

--

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Look around you.

There’s a guy who hasn’t been on a date in three years. He tells himself he’s focused. He’s actually scared shitless and his Spotify Wrapped was 6,000 hours of Joe Rogan.

There’s another person who spent most of yesterday afternoon arguing with strangers on Twitter. They’ll all have forgotten it by Friday.

Sitting behind you at Starbucks is a 32-year-old who optimizes his morning routine instead of starting a family. Cold plunge at 5am. Supplements lined up like soldiers. No kids, no real plan, no one to optimize for.

I’m not judging. I just keep thinking about it at 3am.

Because a scientist predicted all of this. In 1968. Using mice.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Paradise, Engineered

John Calhoun was a behavioral researcher at the National Institute of Mental Health. In the late 1960s, he built Universe 25. A 4.5-foot cubic enclosure designed to be a paradise for mice.

Unlimited food. Unlimited water. Perfect climate. No predators. No disease. Enough space for 3,000 to 4,000 mice.

He started with eight.

The first hundred days were normal. Then the population doubled. And doubled again.

They were thriving.

By Day 600, he had 2,200 mice; still below physical capacity, food still abundant, plenty of room if they’d only spread out.

But something had already cracked.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The Behavioral Sink

Even with space for everyone, the mice clustered. The prime spots near food became unbearably crowded. Other areas sat completely empty.

Dominant males locked down the best territory. Everyone else got pushed into the overflow zones; constant forced contact, no escape, no off-switch.

Calhoun called what followed the “behavioral sink.”

Violence spiked. Courtship collapsed. Females abandoned their babies. Some mothers stopped recognizing their own young.

Males split into two groups: hyper-aggressive bullies who attacked anything that moved near them, and total dropouts who stopped competing, stopped mating, stopped doing anything that resembled a life. They’d been defeated, beaten down so many times they just… checked out.

And then came the beautiful ones.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The Beautiful Ones

This is the part that stuck with me.

A subset of mice withdrew completely from social life. They stopped mating. Stopped fighting. They groomed obsessively, ate well, slept comfortably, and contributed NOTHING.

Objectively, they looked great. Shiny coats. No wounds. Healthy weight.

Completely hollow inside.

They had opted out of every role that matters; parenthood, territory, community, purpose. In exchange for a comfortable, frictionless, pointless existence. Calhoun called them the “beautiful ones.”

Get Josh Roybal’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Japan coined a term for their version of this. “Hikikomori,” which means extreme social withdrawal, often lasting years. Estimates suggest over a million Japanese people live this way, rarely leaving their rooms, surviving on deliveries and screens.

In China they call the broader cultural movement “tang ping,” or lying flat. It’s an actual movement. Young people actively rejecting ambition, career, marriage, and consumption. Not because they can’t have these things. Because they’ve decided the cost of chasing them in an overcrowded, role-starved system isn’t worth it.

And in America, we post about it. Entire Instagram accounts built around traveling alone. Aesthetically perfect photos of a single dinner plate at a restaurant in Lisbon. A sunrise from a mountain no one else climbed with you. Solitude packaged as a personality. Opting out marketed as freedom.

The beautiful ones aren’t a fringe group. They’re a trend.

The population of the mouse universe hit zero around Day 1,200. Not from disease. Not from starvation. The food was still right there.

The mice just… stopped.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Where the Analogy Breaks

Mice couldn’t change the rules of their enclosure.

We can. Humans have redesigned broken systems before. Creating new institutions, new containers for human energy. But every one of those required people to show up and fight for something larger than their own grooming routine.

The beautiful ones never showed up for anything.

Now Look down at Your Phone

Your feed is a behavioral sink.

Not because there are too many people on the planet, but because the system concentrates status and belonging into a handful of platforms where the prime spots are locked down, and everyone else is stuck in the overflow.

You think you’re networking with humanity. But the reality is you’re crammed into a feeding zone with billions of others, all competing for the same scarce resource: attention.

The hyper-aggressive mice? That’s the rage-bait creators. The harassment mobs. The guy who has spent 14 years being furious online and doesn’t know what he actually believes anymore because the algorithm keeps feeding him more to be furious about. Outrage became his territory. It’s the only space he could reliably hold.

The withdrawn mice? The person who follows 600 accounts, consumes 10 hours of content a day, and hasn’t had an original thought years. Full access to the entire human conversation. Still feels completely alone.

And the beautiful ones?

The 30-year-old who’s financially fine but hasn’t flirted with the opposite sex in two years, by choice.

The person with the perfect aesthetic, curated lifestyle, immaculate personal brand, and no real relationships to speak of.

The one who spends their energy looking good instead of building anything. They post pictures of sunsets from places they traveled to alone and call it living.

We are producing beautiful ones at scale.

Read that again.

Press enter or click to view image in full size

The Role Problem

Here’s what Calhoun thought was actually happening, and it’s more interesting than “too many mice.”

It wasn’t the headcount that broke things. It was that there weren’t enough meaningful roles for all of them.

Robert Putnam wrote about a version of this in his 2000 book “Bowling Alone.” Since the 1970s, participation in civic organizations, religious groups, unions, neighborhood associations, even bowling leagues has quietly collapsed. These weren’t just hobbies. They were structures that gave people roles. When you’re the treasurer of the local Rotary Club, you have a role. When you’re the union rep on the floor, you have a role. Someone is counting on you. You have something to defend. We dismantled all of that and handed everyone a phone instead.

The mice that fell apart weren’t stupid or weak. They just couldn’t find a place in the structure where their existence mattered. Where they had something to protect, something to build, something that would suffer if they didn’t show up.

For us, housing locked out a generation. Work became increasingly abstract. Family formation got delayed past the point of momentum.

Nobody built new institutions fast enough to give people something real to belong to.

So they groomed. They scrolled. They looked incredible and produced nothing.

The food was there the whole time.

--

--

Josh Roybal
Josh Roybal

Written by Josh Roybal

Husband and Dad.. AI Powered Generalist.