What Do You Choose?
Change what you measure, and you change what’s possible
We orient toward problems because that’s what gets resourced, funded, rewarded, and noticed.
Problem-solving is the economy of institutions, governments, NGOs, and AI systems.
The infrastructure of “help” is built on the perpetuation of what it claims to solve; not by deliberate design, but by the logic of the system. No problem, no purpose.
Clean water, poverty, division are not resource problems. We already have the resources. They’re imagination problems. We keep applying old thinking to new moments and calling it progress.
Get Ayelet Baron’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
An opportunity-oriented world would look entirely different. It would ask different questions from the start — and would no longer need most of what currently exists. Because we’d remember we’re creators, not consumers.
The opportunity is that, for the first time, the tools to create differently are genuinely accessible — not just to institutions, but to individuals.
The tragedy is that most of those tools are being used to optimize existing problems rather than imagine beyond them.
GDP is one of the clearest examples of the package becoming the thing: we measure consumption and call it wellbeing. Spend more, and the country looks “healthier.” A war boosts GDP. A cancer diagnosis boosts GDP. An oil spill boosts GDP because cleanup costs count as economic activity.
The measure was never designed to capture human flourishing; it was designed to track output. And somewhere along the line, it became the definition of a healthy society.
A person who grows food, makes things, lives simply, and contributes to community becomes economically invisible. Or labeled a problem to fix.
The measure shapes the reality. Change what you measure, and you change what’s possible.
And that’s the paradox: the current system can’t fund its own obsolescence.
