The Publishing Split Conversation Nobody Has Before the Record Comes Out
The session was perfect. The vibe was right. You wrote the hook, the producer built the beat around it, somebody jumped in on the bridge. Everyone left excited. Nobody talked about splits.
Six months later, the record is out and doing numbers. Now everybody remembers the split differently.
This is not a rare story. It’s one of the most common mistakes in music — and it’s completely avoidable.
What a publishing split is
When a song gets created, there are two copyrights: the master (the recording) and the composition (the underlying song — melody and lyrics). Publishing deals with the composition side.
The split determines how publishing royalties — mechanicals, performance royalties, sync licensing fees — get divided between everyone who contributed to the composition. That split needs to be documented. Most of the time, it isn’t.
Why it doesn’t get documented
Nobody wants to kill the creative moment by talking about percentages. So people avoid the conversation and assume the split is whatever they think it is — which is almost never what everyone else thinks it is.
Four collaborators. Four different assumptions. One record. No documentation.
“We agreed in the room” is not a split sheet.
What happens without it
Get Camille N. Anidi, Esq.’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Copyright law can give multiple collaborators ownership interests in a joint work regardless of whether anything was written down. When the split is disputed after the fact, you’re not having a conversation anymore — you’re dealing with attorneys, frozen royalties, and potentially a record that can’t be commercially exploited while the dispute gets resolved.
What a split sheet actually is
A split sheet documents who contributed to the composition, what percentage each person owns, everyone’s PRO affiliations (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, or international equivalent), and publishing information. Everyone signs before the record gets submitted for distribution or registered with a PRO.
This matters because when you register your song with your performing rights organization, the ownership percentages have to match what everyone agreed to. If they don’t, royalties get held.
For cross-border collaborations — particularly between US-based artists and producers working in African markets — this becomes a two-market registration issue. Each writer registers in their home territory and the splits have to be consistent across both registrations. If nothing was ever documented, the conflict is expensive to untangle.
How to make it normal
At the end of the session: “Let’s get the splits down before we leave.”
That’s the whole conversation. It doesn’t have to be adversarial. It just has to happen. The sooner it becomes standard practice in your creative process, the fewer problems you carry forward.
Bottom line
The publishing split conversation is not the one that kills the vibe. The lawsuit is.
If this was useful, I write about music law, creative business, and the industry conversations people avoid until they’re expensive. Subscribe to my Substack for the full version of this piece and everything else I’m publishing:
