The First Time I Talked to a Pirate
LucasArts and the golden age of graphic adventures — what they understood that nobody else did.
It was 1991, or maybe 1992 — childhood memory has that comfortable imprecision that lets you shift things a year or two without changing what really matters. I had a DOS PC, a monochrome monitor, and a game someone had given me on a 5¼-inch floppy disk called The Secret of Monkey Island.
I didn’t speak English. I was ten or eleven years old. And yet I played that game until I finished it, dictionary in hand, understanding half of it and guessing the other half.
Guybrush Threepwood wanted to be a pirate. That much I understood from the beginning. What took me longer to understand was that Guybrush had none of the skills needed to be a pirate — and that was exactly the point. The joke was him. The joke was me playing as him. The joke was both of us together, me as lost as he was, both of us pretending we knew what we were doing.
That was LucasArts.
It wasn’t a company that made graphic adventure games. It was a company that built worlds with an internal logic so consistent, so rigorous, so specifically absurd that once you entered that world, the rules made sense even when they made no sense at all.
Why does a pulley on a rubber chicken solve a problem? Because in the universe of Monkey Island, if you think about the physics for a second, it’s perfectly logical. The solution is absurd in the real world. In the game’s world it’s the only possible solution — and when you find it, you feel like a genius.
That’s design. Not technique. Not technology. Design.
Get Diego Carmona’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Ron Gilbert, Tim Schafer, Dave Grossman, Gary Winnick — the names in those game credits — were writers who made games. Or designers who made literature. The distinction didn’t matter because the result was the same: stories you couldn’t experience any other way.
There was something else LucasArts understood that their main competitor — Sierra On-Line — took too long to learn: the player should never die for not knowing something. They should never reach a dead end. Frustration has to come from the puzzle itself, from thinking harder, from connecting dots that are already there. Not from the arbitrary cruelty of a designer who plants traps with no logic.
Sierra made games where you could die for walking in the wrong direction. Where you could reach the end and discover that ten hours earlier you’d missed an object without which finishing was impossible. LucasArts decided that wasn’t challenge. It was design cruelty.
And they built their games around the opposite principle.
The result was ten years of masterworks: Maniac Mansion, Zak McKracken, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, The Secret of Monkey Island, Monkey Island 2, Day of the Tentacle, Sam & Max Hit the Road, Full Throttle, The Dig, Grim Fandango.
Ten years. Ten games. One philosophy.
The genre died in the late 90s. The industry moved toward 3D graphics and graphic adventures became a nostalgic curiosity. LucasArts shut down its games division in 2004, and with that, something closed that had no name but that everyone who was there recognizes when they see it: a way of making video games that put the player’s intelligence above everything else.
Today there are indie games trying to recover some of that. I play them when I can. Some are genuinely good. None of them made me feel what I felt when I finally found the solution to a LucasArts puzzle after two days of attempts — that specific combination of relief, satisfaction, and the need to tell someone about it.
Some things only happen once. The golden age of graphic adventures was one of those things.
What was your favorite graphic adventure? Or the one that marked you most, even if you never finished it?
