Day 1291

Let me start by saying the last thing I want is a panopticon with zero privacy. My kids and, God willing, grandkids deserve better. But if we’re heading toward that world, I hope the surveillance gets turned on the propaganda itself.

Imagine opening your timeline and seeing payment disclosures below every post:

1. ‘Israel has the right to defend itself 🇮🇱’ — Paid $7,000 by Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs
2. ‘Just got my booster! Science works 💉✨’ — Paid $8,500 by Pfizer
3. ‘As a white ally, I need to listen more 👂’ — Paid $9,000 by McKinsey & Company
4. ‘Our elections are secure and fair 🗳️🇺🇸’ — Paid $4,000 by Dominion Voting Systems
5. ‘Landlords provide housing ☺️’ — Paid $11,000 by BlackRock
6. ‘Sex work is work 💅’ — Paid $6,500 by OnlyFans
7. ‘BITCOIN IS PERFECT MONEY. STUDY BITCOIN. 🚀🟠’ — Paid $0 (they just never shut up)
8. ‘Therapy saved my life besties 💗’ — Paid $10,000 by BetterHelp

At least then you’d see how corrupted the feed actually is. Without the disclosure, most would assume it’s a bot. This transparency becomes critical as AI disrupts labor markets in ways we can’t predict. New jobs will emerge, and influencer, ironically, will likely expand rather than disappear. If AI delivers the deflationary productivity explosion we’re anticipating, people will have exponentially more free time. That time won’t go to meditation retreats. It’ll go to scrolling, creating content, and seeking attention. The influencer economy will bloat because abundance doesn’t eliminate status competition, it intensifies it.

Get Chep’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

Governments won’t mandate payment disclosures. But Andreas Antonopoulos said something that stuck with me: “If you build a panopticon, it stares back.” Privacy isn’t a crime. What those in power don’t grasp is that outlawing privacy cuts both ways. They lose their anonymity too.

Privacy matters because it’s the foundation of independent thought. Without the ability to think, read, and communicate outside surveillance, every idea gets pre-filtered through the question “who’s watching?” You stop exploring uncomfortable truths. You stop questioning authority. You optimize for approval from the system rather than accuracy. Dissent dies not through force but through self-censorship.

We’re already on that path. Surveillance infrastructure exists. Financial tracking is near-total. Communication metadata is harvested at scale. The question isn’t whether the panopticon gets built, it’s whether we realize what we’ve built before it’s weaponized beyond repair.

The solution? Don’t build the panopticon. But the idiots in power will build it anyway because control is more addictive than wisdom. They’ll dress it up as safety, convenience, efficiency. The masses will accept it for slave credits, CBDCs tied to compliance scores, the ability to keep tweeting their sponsored opinions.

Your job isn’t to save them. It’s to save yourself and your family. The freedom tools exist now. Bitcoin. Encrypted communication. Decentralized infrastructure. Jurisdictional arbitrage. Use them before the window closes. While everyone else is optimizing for engagement metrics and social credit, you can build parallel systems that don’t require permission.

The panopticon is, in many ways, already here. But it only works if you must comply with it to access basic necessities. Pain teaches best, and most will learn the hard way. You don’t have to be most.

If you build a panopticon, it stares back.

10/3/25

Conor Jay Chepenik