Sitemap

Member-only story

The Hunt for Red October at 35:

a response to from the perspective of a fan of the book and the movie

4 min readApr 17, 2025

--

Press enter or click to view image in full size
Metal button with a red-on-black silhouette of a submarine conning tower with the words “The Hunt is On” and the date 3–2–90 in bold white text
Original button from a bag of Red October swag

No, is too long. Let me sum up.

While Connery may be the “big name on the ticket”, the film’s staying power is in the growth of Alec Baldwin’s character, Jack Ryan.

Let me esplain.

Springtime is chaotic and the Spring of 1990 was no exception, bringing tornadoes, Easter, graduations, Mother’s Day, and students coming home from college. Not long after I arrived home in May, my dad — a U.S. Navy recruiter — came home one night with complimentary tickets to see The Hunt for Red October.

Having read the book from Naval Institute Press a few years prior, I was excited to see how the movie stood up to the book. In my estimation, there are several reasons John McTiernan’s screen version is one of the truest translations of book-to-film ever.

  1. Casting Alec Baldwin as CIA analyst John Patrick (Jack) Ryan was genius. Tom Clancy describes Ryan in the book as “physically unremarkable, an inch over six feet, and his average build suffered a little at the waist from a lack of exercise” (pg. 36). (Clancy reiterates this to me in a letter in support of an analysis I was writing for Patriot Games: “…he is…

--

--

Christine Carmichael
Christine Carmichael

Written by Christine Carmichael

Academic librarian passionate about sharing knowledge. Old enough to know better, young enough to say, “Why not?” @ccarmichael52 on Threads for more.