The Endless Debate Over What Reading Really Means
Lately, a noticeable pattern of discourse in the way people discuss books has emerged. I recently came across several odd posts on X that reignited the never-ending debate over what truly counts as “reading.” In the era where everything is all about technology, especially how people consume stories, the definition of real reading has grown increasingly blurred. The emergence of platforms such as Kindles, e-readers, and audiobooks seemed to spark some tension among readers for the fact that the medium you used to read matters almost as much as the message itself. Some cling to the belief that “true” readers are those who physically turn pages, while others find fulfillment in experiencing their books through screens and voices. There’s even an unspoken hierarchy where people judge the physical books at the top, e-books in the middle, and audiobooks somewhere at the bottom. As someone who reads books in all three forms, this notion made me wonder, why should the way we read determine if it counts?
The Experience of Reading in Print
First and foremost, let’s talk about the medium everyone worshiped and defended so fiercely, which is physical books. There is undeniably a grounding sensation in holding a physical book and turning its pages. It carried the sensory depth that digital books and audiobooks could never replace. The weight of it, the smell of ink, and the feeling of progress as you almost reached the end of the chapter are all combined to create a tangible connection between a reader and a text. Moreover, reading in print often encourages focus and mindfulness. The absence of notifications or screen glare allows for uninterrupted reading that feels immersive and deliberate. For many, a physical book also holds value, as it can signal devotion, intellect, or be kept as a memory. Yet, having been able to read stories through this kind of medium doesn’t necessarily make someone a better or more authentic reader. On top of that, the statement that the printed page is somehow “purer” ignores how accessibility and technology have transformed who gets to participate in reading in the first place.
Get cynthia’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The Convenience of Reading on Screen
On the other hand, digital reading feels more convenient as it reflects the pace of the world we currently live in. With the existence of e-books and e-reader devices, people can carry an entire library anywhere, highlight quotes easily, and search for definitions instantly, along with adjusting fonts, themes, and brightness for comfort. For some readers, this whole next-level experience is considered very invaluable, fast, and efficient. In my experience, reading an e-book tends to quicken my pace, which feels like a small but satisfying advantage. Yet, this convenience comes at a cost. The glow of a device quickly makes some readers feel fatigue, the random notifications could easily break focus, and the absence of the book’s physicality can make the experience feel less memorable. Still, the accessibility it provides is worth it, as it also breaks geographical and financial barriers that once limited who could read and how.
Listening as a Form of Reading
Then there are audiobooks, the most controversial of the three. “That’s not reading,” some say, “you’re just listening.” Yet, there is research that shows the fact that the comprehension from both listening and reading activates similar areas of the human brain. When we listen to the audiobooks, our minds visualize scenes portrayed through what is being described, interpret the tone, and process the emotion just like when we read. Moreover, a skilled narrator can bring the story to life through a performance that could make listeners experience the text more vividly compared to silent reading. For people with visual impairments, dyslexia, or learning differences, audiobooks are not just an alternative; they are a lifeline to literature. And for many, listening allows for a kind of multitasking that fits modern life. To claim audiobooks as “lesser” forms of reading means to forget the diverse ways humans absorb stories.
Redefining What It Means to Be a Reader
Perhaps it’s time to move past the debate over what counts as “real reading.” Whether we turn pages, swipe screen, or press play, we are still engaging with language, emotions, and narratives.. In addition, the beauty of literature lies in the connection formed between author and reader, story and self, and not in the medium through which it’s absorbed. By gatekeeping our definition of reading, we risk overlooking the diversity of engagement that technology has made possible. For one person, a paperback may be a comforting escape. For another, an audiobook might be the only way to experience stories during a morning commute. The point isn’t how we read, but that we read at all — and how deeply those words moved us. And now it’s time to see digital, physical, and audio reading not as rivals, but as companions in expanding our access to imagination.
