Harm Served
Therefore, the only thing you can do after that is holding those words accountable to stop the harm when Ryan Daly was the starting point to his successful career in his own crime by holding him accountable for his actions in the very evidence he claimed he had stolen; validate his very narrative of his own manufactured crime, and the only person who provided any sort of statement in his own witness, and his own evidence was provided by who. from him?
So where does the case hold true cause if he’s holding the evidence to his own crime, but blaming that my password holds the narrative true but I haven’t made a single statement other than I haven’t touched his laptop.
Why are you asking me about his password!
Cause entered a private property in a home; took a photo with he thought it was his which is still a narrative because there was no witness to a crime that he claimed property to willingly take action to his own story if you even believe it was true, but how can you do that because he’s the culprit to his own crime while being the victim to his own statement while holding his own or a let’s remove the heads and holding a laptop. He doesn’t have the password to look how when you take out his is the only thing that makes the structure hold because that’s if you think it was his based off of his story , but any story that I provide manufactures another crime because there is no crime so nothing holds true crime because he walked off his property while not having the password to register it for his own item which he can validate that that item or various items that manufactured a cried about off of an assumption and then a reality to make the prosecutor believe it was true or we can assume that he paid for a manufactured crimes to premeditate harm onto an individual because he couldn’t actually conduct harm without premeditating it where is the validation just provide me with that because the state attempting to validate somebody who doesn’t have a password to their own property doesn’t hold true within literally the definition of positioning of what you just stated whether or not you have a police report or not the police don’t seize the evidence to a crime that they never reported or the police provided manufactured story on a crime that never happened given six months to manufacture a narrative to justify his crimes against justice he premeditated harm onto an individual when he had gone to the police.
Get Nicholas Grossi’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
if he knew where it was, which clearly he did. Which is why he didn’t allow the police to get it or else somebody that had something stolen reported to the police and provide their password because the very password doesn’t exist anymore because they’re very password validated there actions.
There’s the case?
Sticks and stones break bones, but words don’t hurt because only those words take effect if you allow them to affect you.
Don’t weaponize against people because it’s unethical and doesn’t serve any functional benefit to society.
We all need each other to survive on the ground or in the air. It doesn’t matter; what matters is that we care for one another and our loved ones, but more importantly, your own future.
Be at when you look at my name, no no crime holds true cause everything I write about is the prevention of harm negligence accountability you listen to this actor because he has a story. I don’t need a story cause I have validation and it’s not self validation. There’s evidence because that’s what I build evidence not a crime. There’s a difference building evidence isn’t constructing a crime. it’s providing a receipt because there was no crime so whether you wanna call it crime or story or a narrative that’s up to you but what validate your statement because when you validate your own statements, you need to provide the evidence anything else you already constructed so that’s not evidence. I didn’t construct this text because this text doesn’t need to be a construction to do. It’s an observation so you can hypothesize but don’t try to prove that it’s true when you have no evidence because you didn’t witness or hold enough to call it true if the state obligation is to manufacturer a crime that validate his own statement it’s the police validating the police so all I’m hearing is police crime on police crime. I don’t see why I come into this besides they don’t have a password to their own crime.
