You’re Armoring the Wrong Parts of Your Restaurant
Maria spent her day off eating at the hottest restaurant in town.
She does this a lot. Sit at the bar, order four things, and take notes on her phone like a detective. The small-plates menu. The open kitchen. The Edison bulbs. The QR code menu and the forty-dollar wine flights. The place has a ninety-minute wait on a Tuesday, so whatever they’re doing must be working.
By Thursday she had a plan. Cut the entrées in half and add shareables. Knock out the wall to the kitchen. New lights. A wine flight.
What Maria didn’t do was walk two blocks east and look through the brown paper on the window of the restaurant that tried the exact same concept eighteen months ago. Same small plates. Same open kitchen. Same lights. It closed in fourteen months.
Nobody takes notes at that restaurant. There’s nothing to sit at.
Maria isn’t foolish. She’s doing what almost every owner does. She’s studying the planes that made it home.
The Planes That Made It Home
During World War II, a group of mathematicians at Columbia University called the Statistical Research Group worked on problems for the U.S. military. One of them was a statistician named Abraham Wald.
The story, as it’s usually told, goes like this. Bombers were coming back from missions shot full of holes. The military looked at where the bullet holes clustered on the returning planes, mostly the wings and the fuselage, and wanted to add armor there. Armor is heavy, so you can’t put it everywhere. Put it where the damage is. Makes sense.
Wald saw it the other way around.
These were the planes that came back. A plane could take a lot of holes in the wings and still fly home. The places with no holes on the returning planes, like the engines, weren’t the places that never got hit. They were the places where a hit meant the plane never returned. The missing holes were on the missing planes.
Armor the parts with no holes.
That idea now has a name: survivorship bias. You look at the winners who made it through, you study what they have in common, and you forget about everyone who had the same traits and didn’t make it. The evidence you can see has already been filtered. Everything that would have told you the truth crashed somewhere you weren’t looking.
Restaurants are one of the best places on earth to fall for it.
Your Industry Is a Museum of Survivors
Think about where owners get their ideas.
The busy restaurant across town. The chef with the cookbook and the TV spot. The guy at the industry conference who started with one food truck and now has eleven units. The Instagram account with a beautiful dining room and a line out the door.
Every one of those is a plane that made it home.
You don’t see the hundreds of food trucks that did everything the same way and folded. You don’t hear the keynote from the owner who knocked out the wall, bought the lights, and lost her house. There’s no conference panel called “Concepts That Looked Great and Didn’t Work.” Failure doesn’t get a book deal.
Even the most famous restaurant statistic is a survivor story turned upside down. For years people repeated that 90% of restaurants fail in the first year. When H.G. Parsa and his colleagues actually tracked restaurant openings and closings and published their findings in 2005, the number was nowhere near that. It was closer to a quarter in year one, and around six in ten within three years. Still brutal. But the myth spread because it was dramatic, and the real data took a researcher willing to go count the empty buildings.
That’s the job. Somebody has to go count the empty buildings.
Four Places Owners Patch the Wrong Holes
When I coach owners, survivorship bias shows up in a few predictable places. See if any of these sound familiar.
1. Copying the Winner’s Paint Job
Maria’s story. You see a successful restaurant and copy what’s easiest to see: the menu format, the decor, the price points, the hashtags.
But what you can see is rarely why they’re winning. The real reason might be a GM who has been there nine years, a landlord who gave them a rent deal in 2019, a chef who has the purveyors on speed dial, or a neighborhood that was about to boom. The Edison bulbs are just the paint job on the plane. You copied the paint job and skipped the engine.
2. “We Never Did That and We’re Fine”
This one is sneaky, because it’s your own story.
“I never had a budget. I never wrote job descriptions. I never did a pre-shift. I’ve been open twelve years.” The unspoken conclusion is that those things don’t matter.
Maybe. Or maybe you survived in spite of skipping them. Maybe you had a great location, low rent, or a partner who quietly covered the gaps. The owners who skipped the same things and didn’t survive aren’t around to tell you their version. Your twelve years are proof that you made it. They aren’t proof of how.
When “it’s always worked” is the main argument for keeping something, that’s a good moment to check where your bullet holes are.
3. Listening Only to the Guests Who Stayed
You read your reviews. You talk to your regulars. You know the family that comes every Friday by name. They love the place.
Of course they do. They’re the ones who came back.
The guests with the most useful feedback are the ones you’ll never hear from. The couple who waited twenty-five minutes for a check and quietly decided not to return. The lunch crowd from the office park who drifted to the fast-casual place that gets them out in thirty minutes. They don’t write one-star reviews. They just stop showing up, and a missing guest makes no sound.
Get Donald Burns’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
If your entire picture of the guest experience comes from people who are still coming, you’re armoring the wings.
4. Building Culture Around the People Who Stayed
“Our team loves it here. Some of these folks have been with me eight years.”
That’s real, and it matters. But look at who’s in that picture. It’s the people who fit. The ones who could handle your quirks, your schedule, your Sunday text messages. Everyone who couldn’t is gone, and most of them left quietly in the first sixty days.
Your onboarding feels fine because the people who survived it say it was fine. Your chef’s temper feels manageable because the cooks who couldn’t manage it are working somewhere else now. The long-tenured crew is a survivor sample. The story of your culture is written just as much by who walked out the back door in week two.
How to Go Looking for the Missing Planes
You can’t fix what you refuse to look at. So here’s how to start armoring the right parts.
Move 1: Count the empty buildings
Before you copy a concept, a menu format, or a marketing idea, ask one question. Who else tried this and didn’t make it, and what was different about them?
Drive past the closed restaurants in your market. Talk to the local broker, the equipment reseller, the food rep who has seen five owners come and go in the same space. They’ll tell you what the menus and the decor never will. You’ll learn more from one honest conversation about a closed restaurant than from ten meals at the hot spot.
Move 2: Separate what you can see from what’s doing the work
When a competitor is winning, make two lists. On the left, everything you can see: menu, design, price, social media. On the right, everything you can’t see from a bar stool: leadership, training, rent, systems, how long the key people have been there, how they handle a bad night.
Then be honest about which list is more likely to be the engine. It’s almost always the one on the right.
Move 3: Talk to the people who left
Do a real exit conversation with every team member who leaves, even the ones who leave badly. Better yet, call people who quit in the first ninety days, a month after they’re gone, when there’s no reason to be polite. Ask one question: “What would have made you stay?”
You won’t like every answer. That’s the point. Those answers are the holes in the engine.
Move 4: Find your missing guests
Most POS and reservation systems can show you regulars who have stopped coming. Pull the list of guests who used to visit every month and haven’t been in for ninety days. Reach out to a few. Not with a coupon. With a question.
The guests who drifted away know exactly where your experience is leaking. You just have to be willing to ask them.
Move 5: Run a pre-mortem before big moves
The psychologist Gary Klein popularized a simple tool called the pre-mortem. Before you launch something, you imagine it’s a year from now and the plan has failed. Then everyone writes down why.
Try it before your next remodel, menu change, or second location. Sit your leaders down and say, “It’s next October and this was a disaster. What happened?” People who would never criticize the boss’s idea to his face will happily explain how it fell apart in a story about the future. You get to see the bullet holes before the plane ever takes off.
Move 6: Question your own success story
Once a year, take the things you’re proudest of skipping and put them back on the table. “We’ve never needed a budget.” “We don’t do formal training.” “Our people just figure it out.”
Ask: if a new owner did exactly what I did, in a tougher location, with less luck, would it still work? If the honest answer is “probably not,” you’ve found a part of your restaurant that’s been flying without armor. You just haven’t taken the hit yet.
The Bottom Line
The winners will always be the loudest voices in the room. That’s how it works. Their dining rooms are full, their stories get told, and their bulbs are easy to buy.
But the most useful information in your market is sitting behind brown paper on a closed window, in the head of the cook who quit in week two, and in the memory of the guest who stopped coming without saying a word.
Maria eventually walked those two blocks east. She called the broker who leased the dead space. She learned the small plates weren’t the problem. The previous owner had no kitchen leadership, a 41% labor cost, and nobody who could run a Friday night without him. Maria didn’t need new lights. She needed a kitchen manager she could trust and a prep system that didn’t live in one person’s head.
Stop studying where the winners got hit and survived.
Go find where the others got hit and didn’t.
That’s where the armor goes.
Most restaurant owners aren’t short on ideas. They’re short on honest feedback from the places they never think to look: the team members who left, the guests who drifted away, and the systems they’ve been getting lucky without.
The TRC Method™ helps independent restaurant owners find the real weak points in their operation before they become the reason the doors close. We look past the paint job to the engine: leadership, systems, accountability, and the numbers that tell the truth.
Visit www.TheRestaurantCoach.com to learn how the TRC Method™ helps you stop copying what looks good from a bar stool and start building the parts of your restaurant that actually keep it flying.
Tags: Restaurant, Restaurant Business, Restaurant Owners, Mindset, Leadership
db
