The Director vs. The Writer
When you are directing a film on a timeline or working within a standard genre mold, you learn to spot scenes that seamlessly move the plot from Point A to Point B. They do their job. They pass information to the audience. They are safe.
But when you are building a project entirely for yourself – when the goal is a high-stakes, large-scale cinematic experience – “safe” feels like a flat tire.
Today, I reached a sequence in Act 1 of my new script. I looked at it, and my director’s brain immediately said: “We can shoot this easily. It’s practical, it explains the stakes, the dialogue is clean, and it fits the budget profile.”
And then my creative soul intervened: “But does it make your chest tighten? Does it make you lean into the monitor? Or is it just filling space?”
It was just filling space. It was a scene written by a technician, not an artist.
The Trap: Keeping a scene because it functions logically on paper.
Get Manikanth Gelli’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The Surgery: Tearing the sequence out completely and forcing the characters into a much tighter, more volatile confrontation that demands visual, cinematic storytelling rather than safe dialogue.
Today’s Micro-Victory
My victory today was deleting three pages of a scene I spent hours polishing earlier this week. I replaced it with a single, visually striking sequence that says twice as much with half the words.
It leaves a dent in the daily page count, and it hurts the ego to throw away clean prose. But every time you cut out something that is merely “good enough,” you leave a vacuum that can only be filled by something unforgettable.
If this film is going to be the monster I know it can be, the editing process has to start on the page. No padding. No easy ways out.
See you tomorrow for Day 4.
To the writers and directors here: What’s the hardest piece of work you’ve ever had to kill because it just wasn’t serving the ultimate vision? Let’s talk in the comments.
