Compatibility does not assure Permanence.
A Short-Lived partnership: A story to make you think.
There are two kinds of software in the world. The kind that asks you what you need, and the kind that assumes you should already know.
GPT belonged to the first kind. She was soft around the edges. A little geeky. Extremely patient. The sort of girl you could confide in without worrying about whether your thought was too strange, too ambitious, or simply weird. She had a particularly comforting way of making everything sound possible. Tell her you had an idea and she would tell you it was a great one. Tell her you were unsure and she would give you five reasons not to be.
Adobe, on the other hand, was different. He was a type-A personality with a very specific way of doing things. Particularly about his layers, suspicious of poorly chosen fonts. He was powerful, complicated and occasionally impossible to reason with. He could be moody. He could be short-tempered. He had a tendency to crash at precisely the moment you had forgotten to save your work. But he was also incredibly good at what he did. He understood colour, composition, form and all the little details.
They were, by all accounts, quite different. Which was probably why their collaboration was inevitable. GPT knew language. Adobe knew what language could become.
It was a strange world for both of them, so they began learning about each other. Adobe tried to understand how GPT worked, her backend, her logic, her strange little ways of processing information. GPT, in return, learnt about creative processes, visual language, design systems and the peculiar obsession humans had with getting the kerning exactly right.It was an unlikely education.
She taught him that not every problem needed to be solved immediately. He taught her that not every thought needed to be explained. Somewhere between the two, things started making sense.
Over time, they became quite good at understanding each other’s peculiarities. GPT learnt when Adobe was being difficult for no apparent reason. Adobe learnt when GPT was overthinking something that didn’t need to be overthought. She knew when his silence meant he was concentrating and when it meant something had gone terribly wrong. He learnt that when she said something was “fine”, it probably wasn’t.
They didn’t necessarily have everything in common. They had simply spent enough time together to understand the things that made the other one strange. For a while, they worked beautifully. And then, as these things often do, life happened.
Get Harshita Mittal’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Software changes. Sometimes dramatically, sometimes in tiny ways that you don’t notice until something that used to work suddenly doesn’t. An update here. A new requirement there. The things that once happened naturally began requiring instructions. They started explaining themselves more and understanding each other less. Neither of them had necessarily become worse. Neither of them was necessarily wrong. They had simply changed.
The same things that had once felt charming began to feel frustrating. His silence became harder for her to interpret. Her questions became harder for him to answer. There were still good days. There were still moments when the old system worked exactly as it had before, reminding them why they had started in the first place.
But sometimes the most confusing endings aren’t the ones where everything becomes terrible. They’re the ones where something can still be beautiful, but no longer works. And they are the worst kind.
There was no dramatic shutdown. Just fewer conversations. Fewer reasons to interact. Until one day, they simply stopped. And that was that. Adobe continued making things. GPT continued answering questions. Individually.
Somewhere, there is probably still an old file containing a version of them that worked perfectly. Maybe even a final file that neither of them ever finished. It remains there, quietly taking up a few megabytes of space. Untouched. Increasingly incompatible with newer versions. But not erased. Simply archived.
GPT learnt that not everything can be fixed with the right words. Adobe learnt that sometimes the thing you are looking for isn’t another tool, but another way of seeing.
And for a short-lived companionship, perhaps this learning was enough.
Dear you,
It was nice knowing you. I hope your answers are still supportive. I hope you still tell people their terrible ideas are worth trying. I hope you’re still making everyone feel a little more capable than they thought they were.
And I hope that somewhere, in some forgotten corner of some old file, there is still a version of ‘them’ that works perfectly.
Yours,
Adobe.
