MEMORANDUM

DATE: October 8, 2026
Weekly Ship Log — Growing from Simple Logging to Better Engineering Documentation

1. What I Am Currently Building

I am expanding the Weekly Ship Log from a simple personal journal into a more useful engineering log for documenting not only what I built, but also why I made certain decisions and how those decisions connect to actual Git commits.

The main goal this week was to make each entry more useful as a record of both the work completed and the thinking behind it.

Get Dave Hennit’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

The new improvements include:

• More Detailed Entries: I added new fields for “Why I Made This Change,” Git commit messages, commit hashes or URLs, tags, work status, and entry types. Entries can now be grouped as Shipped, Decision, Fix, Learning, or Experiment. I also made sure older entries still work even though they do not contain these new fields.
• Better Search and Filtering: I expanded the search so users can search through entry text, reasons, commit information, tags, and entry types. Users can also filter logs by tags, entry type, and time periods such as Today, Last 7 Days, Last 30 Days, and All Time.
• Stats and Weekly Summaries: I added a dashboard that shows total entries, entries created during the week, current logging streak, and longest streak. I also added weekly summaries that organize what was shipped, fixed, learned, or decided and allow the summary to be copied or exported as Markdown.
• Useful Workflow Tools: Entries can now be pinned for easier access. Users can copy a full entry or just the commit message. I also added a Markdown backup feature that exports all saved entry information, even when filters are active.
• Mobile Improvements: I improved the layout for smaller screens between roughly 320px and 480px. The stats now use a mobile-friendly grid, search takes the full width, badges wrap correctly, long commit hashes do not break the layout, and buttons are easier to tap.
• Cleaner User Experience and Documentation: I added a collapsible “Add Context” section so optional details such as commit information and reasons do not make the main form feel too busy. I also improved empty states, continued using Lucide icons, and updated both README.md and Journal.md to explain the new features and decisions.

2. What I Learned This Week

• Adding New Data Without Breaking Old Entries: Adding new fields to an existing app can easily break older saved data. I learned to give missing fields safe default values so old entries can continue working without errors.
• Not Every Feature Needs to Be Visible Immediately: As I added more fields, the entry form started becoming too crowded. Using the collapsible “Add Context” section helped keep the main action simple while still giving users access to more advanced options when they need them.
• Managing Multiple Filters Gets Complicated Quickly: Combining live search, tags, entry types, and date filters can become difficult to manage. I learned that it is better to keep the original entry data unchanged and generate the displayed results from the active filters instead of repeatedly changing the saved data.

3. Where I Am Currently Stuck & Challenged

• Performance With Many Entries: Search, filtering, and weekly grouping currently happen directly in the browser using data stored in localStorage. This works well for smaller logs, but with hundreds of detailed entries, live search may begin to feel slower. I am exploring ways to make the search more efficient without making the app unnecessarily complicated.
• Manual Git Information vs. Automation: Adding commit hashes and commit messages makes each log entry easier to trace back to the actual code. However, manually copying this information into the app can become repetitive. I am trying to decide whether it is better to keep the process simple and manual or eventually connect the app to Git or GitHub for automatic imports.
• Understanding Whether Other Developers Need This: I personally see value in recording why a technical decision was made, but I still need to find out whether other developers would regularly use this type of documentation. One important question I still need to test is whether users will consistently fill in the “Why I Made This Change” field or eventually skip it.