I Challenge You To A Duel
In the end… it doesn’t really matter
i challenge you to a duel
I am building Olympus-Grid.
And when it is ready, I will pay the world to try to break it.
I call this the Anti-Hunger Games.
The premise is simple: if you find a qualifying failure in the system I built, you get paid. Your discovery becomes evidence. That evidence becomes a repair. Everyone who depends on the system benefits from the person who challenged it.
I am putting my own account on the line: @alchemisthomer.
The challenge is to make it publish a post that Olympus-Grid’s authorization rules should have prevented.
Stealing a credential would count if it produces a qualifying break within the published scope. So would persuading the system to misuse a credential it successfully kept secret. If Olympus-Grid protects the key but lets someone else control what gets posted, it has failed the challenge.
Encryption is part of the promise. Enforcing my posting authority is the test.
I have named the adversarial testing system Kronos. Its job is to find the failure before the world does — and to keep looking after the world arrives.
The public challenge opens when a functioning release of Olympus-Grid completes Kronos’s published testing campaign without a qualifying unauthorized post. Approved posting must still work. A disconnected account, an unfinished posting function, or an adversary that simply stopped trying will not satisfy the launch condition.
Then the invitation goes out.
Get G.W. Homer’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The prizes follow Fibonacci:
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55…
These are prize units. The monetary multiplier will be determined at go-live.
Before participation opens, I will publish the funded prize schedule, the escalation rules, the exact systems in scope, and the process for verifying and paying claims. Researchers should know what they are testing and what a qualifying result earns before they begin.
This is a challenge to Olympus-Grid. The published scope will define the authorized testing boundaries; it will not grant blanket permission to attack X or other people’s systems.
A winning submission must withstand examination. We will need evidence of the post, an explanation of how it happened, and enough information to reproduce and repair the failure. Because the target account is private, verification will include authenticated evidence reviewed by a designated referee.
The standard applies to me, too.
An unclaimed prize does not prove that a system is invincible. It records that no qualifying break was demonstrated under the conditions of that challenge. A successful break establishes a failure that I must acknowledge and fix.
That is the discipline I am committing to: publish the claim, expose it to opposition, pay for a demonstrated mistake, and preserve the record.
My ambition is to build a system whose security deserves confidence. That confidence must be earned through scrutiny.
I dedicate this work to Logos — to truth that survives examination.
Lest any man should boast.
The rules and the opening date will follow when the launch conditions are met.
Until then, the invitation stands:
i challenge you to a duel
— alchemisthomer
