Weapons Training as an Integral Part of “Empty-Hand” Practice
Historians of East Asian martial traditions have convincingly demonstrated that martial arts originally developed as methods of combat involving various types of melee and ranged weapons, and only later — alongside shifts in social conditions — began to incline more strongly toward unarmed methods, or more precisely, arts.
By that time, these early practices had already moved beyond relatively primitive “methods” and evolved into refined “arts,” implying systematic training and the deliberate cultivation of skill. This developmental process did not stop there. The arts in question continued to progress further, approaching something akin to a science, as training methodologies became increasingly structured and theoretically grounded — with a clearer understanding of what should be trained, how it should be trained, in what volume, and over what duration (though, of course, not uniformly across all schools).
As historical conditions changed and technologies advanced, many weapons that had faithfully served professional warriors for centuries were rapidly replaced by more sophisticated means of warfare. As a result, the arts of the sword, bow, spear, and others gradually lost their former practical significance. Unarmed systems of combat, however, did not disappear. On the contrary, they appear to retain their appeal among modern enthusiasts due to their greater accessibility (they require neither expensive equipment nor specialized training environments) and the relative absence of externally imposed restrictions (in most contemporary societies, one cannot simply carry a wakizashi for personal defense).
It should also be emphasized that “empty-hand” practices, having developed alongside weapon-based methods, eventually came to represent far more than a collection of sophisticated techniques for neutralizing an opponent. Traditions such as what we now call wushu and karate — especially when designated as “traditional” — have evolved into comprehensive systems of self-cultivation.
These systems encompass not only physical development, but also mental and, in a broader sense, “spiritual” cultivation. Training within established schools involves refined control of the body, the development of force, the coordination between body and mind, and methods of enhancing physical capabilities through the cultivation of mental processes. This constitutes an additional factor underlying the enduring relevance of these arts for individuals seeking long-term health, personal security, and a deeper understanding of practice through the lenses of science and philosophy.
In this context, the practice of traditional weapons within ostensibly “empty-hand” systems acquires an additional layer of significance. Beyond improving practical self-defense skills through the handling of various objects — long, medium, or short; bladed or blunt — it serves a more fundamental purpose. The central principle is the projection and transmission of bodily and mental force into the weapon, effectively transforming it into an extension of the practitioner’s body. Accordingly, all principles governing the flow and management of force in wushu and karate remain fully applicable.
Get DenSu’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
At the same time, the use of weapons imposes additional demands on bodily movement, requiring a higher degree of coordination. This is due to the fundamental alteration of engagement distance and the expansion of the effective striking range.
This last point is particularly important. Effective self-defense requires the ability to move quickly and in a coordinated manner across extended distances — evading an attack while simultaneously counterattacking a vulnerable target. Attempts to rely on static ‘blocking’ actions — similar to those used in empty-hand practice — may result in synchronizing with the opponent’s rhythm, thereby granting them at least one additional opportunity to strike.
It must also be remembered that at the moment of one’s own counterattack, the opponent retains the capacity to strike simultaneously. One cannot disregard the phenomenon known as “mutual killing” — a term originating in kenjutsu and repeatedly confirmed in practice — where both opponents launch attacks at the same time, and one may deliver a fatal blow even after having been mortally wounded.
In this light, the well-known Okinawan maxim “in karate, one does not strike first” acquires a deeper and more practical meaning — one that, judging by many contemporary interpretations, has largely become inaccessible to modern “specialists.”
A third dimension to be highlighted is the “spiritual” aspect. This is multifaceted and includes the principle of “transforming the weapon into emptiness” — that is, acting not through the weapon itself, but through consciousness. This can be understood in terms of the unity of form and intent, as expressed in the concept of Xingyi, as well as the absence of deliberative thought, known in Japanese as Mushin. Such a state frees additional physiological and cognitive resources, increases speed of movement and reaction, and manifests as what is often described as spontaneity.
And finally, by way of illustration — a brief video demonstration of jō-no-kata training within the practice of traditional karate…
