Day 95/100: Why Nothing Has a Fixed Nature
“Everything is empty, and everything is possible.”
— Nagarjuna
Imagine picking up a simple wooden chair. It seems like one of the most ordinary objects in the world. It has four legs, a seat, and a backrest. You call it a chair without thinking twice. But now begin asking a few uncomfortable questions. Is the chair still a chair if you remove one leg? What if you remove the seat? What if you dismantle every piece and scatter them across the floor? At what exact moment does the chair stop being a chair? More importantly, where was the "chair" hiding in the first place? Was it in the wood? The nails? The shape? Or was the idea of a chair something your mind imposed upon a collection of parts?
This is the kind of question Nagarjuna wanted us to confront. He believed we move through life assuming that people, objects, and even ideas possess fixed and independent identities. We think things simply are what they are. A tree is a tree. A mountain is a mountain. I am me. Yet Nagarjuna argued that this certainty rests upon an illusion. Nothing possesses an independent essence that exists entirely by itself. Everything exists only because of countless relationships, causes, and conditions.
This is what he meant by emptiness.
The word "empty" sounds negative, as though it implies that nothing exists. But Nagarjuna meant something very different. Emptiness does not mean nonexistence. It means the absence of an independent, permanent nature. Every object depends on something else. Every event arises because of previous events. Every person is shaped by family, culture, language, biology, history, and experience. Nothing exists completely on its own.
And because nothing is fixed forever, everything remains capable of change.
The Syllogism
Premise 1 (P1): Everything that exists depends upon causes, conditions, and relationships rather than existing independently.
Premise 2 (P2): Whatever depends upon changing conditions cannot possess a permanent and fixed essence.
Conclusion: All things are empty of independent existence, making transformation and new possibilities always possible.
At first, this conclusion sounds abstract, but its implications are remarkably practical. Think about how often we define ourselves using permanent labels. We say, "I am shy," "I am a failure," "I am intelligent," or "I am unlucky." These descriptions begin as observations but gradually harden into identities. We stop seeing them as temporary patterns and begin treating them as unchangeable facts.
Nagarjuna invites us to question those labels.
If your personality has been shaped by experiences, relationships, habits, and circumstances, then it is not fixed. Change the conditions, and the person can change as well. The student who struggles today may thrive under a different teacher. The timid child may become a confident adult. The person consumed by anger may become compassionate after years of reflection.
If identity has no permanent essence, then transformation is always possible.
This is why emptiness is not a pessimistic idea.
Get Jal Patidar’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
It is an extraordinarily hopeful one.
We often fear change because we believe things possess fixed natures. We assume certain people will always be selfish, certain societies will always remain divided, or certain failures will permanently define us. Nagarjuna argues that this way of thinking misunderstands reality itself. Since everything arises through conditions, changing those conditions creates new possibilities.
Consider a seed. Looking at it, you might think it is simply a small object lying in your hand. Yet the seed contains the possibility of becoming a tree. Whether that possibility becomes reality depends upon countless conditions: sunlight, water, soil, temperature, and time. None of these factors alone create the tree. Together, they allow something new to emerge.
Human lives work much the same way.
Who you become depends not on a fixed essence hidden inside you but on the countless conditions shaping your existence every day.
This insight also changes how we view conflict. Imagine two people arguing. Each believes the other is simply a difficult person. One calls the other stubborn. The other responds by calling their opponent unreasonable. Both assume the conflict exists because of permanent personality traits.
Nagarjuna would ask a different question.
What conditions produced this disagreement?
Perhaps exhaustion, misunderstanding, fear, pride, or poor communication played larger roles than either person realizes. If so, changing those conditions may transform the relationship itself. Instead of seeing people as fixed identities, we begin seeing them as dynamic processes constantly shaped by circumstances.
This shift encourages compassion.
When we stop believing that people possess permanent moral essences, forgiveness becomes easier because change becomes imaginable.
Modern science unexpectedly echoes parts of Nagarjuna's insight. Biology teaches us that every cell in our body is constantly changing. Psychology shows that the brain remains capable of rewiring itself throughout life. Physics reveals that even seemingly solid objects are mostly empty space held together by relationships between particles. Reality appears far less static than common sense suggests.
Nagarjuna reached a similar conclusion through philosophy rather than science. He believed permanence is often something the mind projects onto a world that is fundamentally relational and dynamic.
There is another consequence of this idea. If nothing possesses an independent existence, then nothing exists entirely alone. Every meal depends upon farmers, rain, sunlight, transport, and countless unseen workers. Every book depends upon authors, printers, teachers, languages, and generations of accumulated knowledge. Even your thoughts depend upon words you did not invent and ideas you inherited from others.
Recognizing this dissolves the illusion of complete independence.
We begin seeing life as an immense web of interdependence where everything influences everything else.
Nagarjuna's quote ultimately sounds paradoxical because it joins two ideas we rarely connect. Emptiness appears to suggest limitation, while possibility suggests freedom. Yet for him, the opposite is true. Because nothing possesses a fixed essence, nothing is imprisoned by what it currently is. Every situation remains open to transformation because reality itself is never completely finished.
Perhaps that is Nagarjuna's deepest lesson. We suffer whenever we mistake temporary identities for permanent truths. We imprison ourselves inside labels that reality never intended to be permanent. But when we recognize that everything is empty of fixed nature, we also discover something remarkable. The future is never fully determined. Change is always possible because nothing, including ourselves, is ever as fixed as it first appears.
