The Making of a Buzzword.
It is by universal misunderstanding that all agree. For if, by ill luck, people understood each other, they would never agree.—Charles Baudelaire
Interestingly enough, when the term ‘synergy’ was adopted and refined by Buckminster Fuller in the 1940s, its nature was neutral—neither positive nor negative. He merely posited that the behavior of whole systems cannot be predicted from the behavior of their individual parts when observed separately. Only later was the term hijacked by leadership self-help gurus and given an all-positive, rah-rah makeover.
There’s a long list of terms that began as neutral, technical, or obscure concepts and were later co-opted, rebranded, or reappropriated by corporate, leadership, or pop-psychology cultures. Often losing their core insight—and thus much of their value—in the process.
Take ‘paradigm shift’, coined by philosopher Thomas Kuhn to denote fundamental shifts in scientific frameworks, now used as a buzzword to describe almost any new idea or minor improvement.
Or ‘disruption’, used specifically by Christensen to describe how simpler, cheaper alternatives overtake established products by targeting overlooked segments, now a badge of honor for celebrity CEOs, used to glorify changes that are either superficial or outright destructive.
Or ‘mindfulness’, a Buddhist practice of cultivating awareness and presence, usually within a rigorous ethical and philosophical framework, now packaged as mere stress reduction to make poorly managed workplaces seem more palatable.
Get Jacek Pastuszka’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Or ‘empowerment’, a social and political act of giving marginalized groups actual power and autonomy, now reduced to motivational fluff about being ‘enabled’ to take initiative, without any real hierarchical power or a clear mandate for change.
Or ‘authenticity’, a serious existentialist philosophical concept relating to being true to oneself, now an outlet for Brené Brown’s exalted, lightweight bromides.
Or ‘resilience’, a technical term in engineering referring to the baseline return after stress, now a pop-psychology trick to imply that people should ‘toughen up.’
Or ‘feedback’, another engineering concept that describes output influencing future inputs, now made into a euphemism for critiquing others.
And finally, ‘agile’ — the crown jewel of buzzword co-optation—a software development method turned into a ‘cure-all’ management fad.
Baudelaire hit the nail on the head. If people actually understood the concepts they talk about—in all their nuance, provenance, and original intention—they would revert to much simpler language.
There may be more friction, but less fiction. Shattered shared delusions and a broken spell of apparent harmony, but fewer misunderstandings.
