Charting the Unknown

Towards a Deeper Understanding of Reality and Mind

Consciousness

1. Our only access to external reality is through our subjective experiences. All scientific observations, measurements, and data are ultimately filtered through conscious perception. We are forever locked in consciousness, with only indirect evidence of an outer world.
2. Remarkably, the academic inquiry into the enigma of consciousness only started to emerge in the mid-1990s. As late as 1989, the International Dictionary of Psychology declared: “Consciousness is a mysterious phenomenon. Nobody knows what it is, how it works, or what it’s for, nothing worth reading has ever been written on it.”
3. There is still no universally accepted, complete, and definitive definition of consciousness. Perhaps the most popular one goes back to an essay written in 1974, called What Is It Like to Be a Bat?, highlighting the subjective, experiential aspect of consciousness.
4. The hard problem of consciousness asks how inanimate and insentient matter can coalesce and give rise to subjective experiences. In other words, how does a first-person perspective emerge in the universe? Over 30 years after its formulation, the hard problem’s repercussions are still being felt today, resulting in a deep schism within academic circles. Either consciousness is not what it seems to be, or reality
   is not what it seems to be. In essence, there appears to be an irreconcilable tension between the first-person and third-person perspectives.

Metaphysics

1. Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy focusing on the nature of reality, addressing questions about the underlying structure and essence of the world. Ontology, a subfield of metaphysics, is concerned with the study of being or existence, asking what kinds of entities exist and how they can be categorized. Epistemology is another branch of philosophy dealing with the nature and scope of knowledge, exploring questions about belief, truth, and justification.
2. The nature of consciousness is currently a metaphysical problem, not a scientific one.
3. We pride ourselves on being commonsensical beings. However, beneath the veneer of rationality lurk idiosyncratic assumptions about the nature of existence that transcend reason. These are metaphysical beliefs that shape our perception of reality and inform our behaviors.
4. Building upon the foundations of the Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment implicitly adopted a very specific metaphysical outlook. The universe was understood as a giant clockwork, and by analyzing its tiniest components, it was believed that everything could be understood.
5. Today, these metaphysical assumptions are collectively known as physicalism, assuming a materialist-reductionist ontology.
6. Physicalism is, however, a metaphysical claim that cannot be proven or disproven by science. By definition, metaphysics begins where science ends. In essence, while the latter inquires about the “how,” the former contemplates the “what.”
7. Physicists almost unanimously ignore the philosophical foundations and implications of their work. This attitude is epitomized by the rallying cry, “Shut up and calculate!” and the quip that the philosophy of science is as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.
8. A famous philosopher once warned: “If you don’t go into metaphysics, you assume an uncritical metaphysics.”

Science

1. The cornerstone of scientific knowledge generation can be understood as an act of translation. Quantifiable aspects of reality are encoded in abstract, formal representations hosted in the human mind. In simple terms, mathematics is the machine code of reality. As a result, physical phenomena become intelligible to the mind, and guided by the formal rules pertaining to the abstract realm, the mind can uncover novel insights.
2. This “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences” has unleashed technological marvels that seem almost magical. We are witnessing rapid technological advancements that far surpass what was once deemed possible, solely due to this mapping between the structures within the human mind and those of the cosmos.
3. Science describes both the animate and inanimate aspects of the cosmos without much reference to subjectivity. In other words, it assumes an objective, mind-independent reality. This commitment to a descriptive, third-person perspective renders the first-person perspective mostly irrelevant.
4. While science has uncovered countless intimate details of nature’s workings to an astonishing degree, overall, we remain faced with many existential enigmas.

Physics

1. The standard model of particle physics is a quantum field theory constrained by symmetry principles that describes all subatomic particles and the three non-gravitational forces in the universe.
2. The theory of general relativity reframes the force of gravity as the curvature of 4-dimensional spacetime.
3. Although both theories have been validated to a spectacular degree of accuracy, they refuse to yield a unified description of reality, namely a theory of quantum gravity.
4. The accidental discovery of the quantum realm in 1905 revealed a foundation of reality that defies common sense, logic, rationality, and coherence. The list of bizarre quantum phenomena includes duality, superposition, uncertainty, tunneling, contextuality, entanglement, and the measurement problem, each challenging our classical understanding of nature.
5. Quantum physics suggests a ghostlike, intangible, contradictory, constrained, but fundamentally interconnected metaphysical essence underlying the seemingly physical world. A material foundation of reality thus appears contentious, and physicalism seems like a simplistic and naı̈ve assumption. In contrast, an emerging alternative paradigm suspects that information is the fundamental building block of the physical universe, the sole ontological primitive.
6. At the bleeding edge of theoretical physics, black hole thermodynamics, and string theory suggest that our 3-dimensional world of ordinary experience is a hologram, an image of reality coded on a distant 2-dimensional surface, and that space and time are emergent properties of a deeper structure.
7. Some of the open problems in physics include:
   • What is time, and why does it have a direction?
   • What is the inner structure and radius of a proton, and can it decay?
   • Why do neutrinos have non-zero mass?
   • How should we interpret quantum physics?
   • Why is gravity so weak?
   • What is 95% of the mass-energy content of the cosmos made of?
   • How did the observed large-scale structures in the universe form?
   • Is the universe infinite?
   • Why do we measure different values for the accelerated expansion of the universe?
8. The mechanisms by which simple physical laws lead to complex, self-organizing systems — resulting in phenomena such as life and consciousness — remain mysterious, challenging our reductionist worldview.

Complexity

1. Complexity science is an amalgamation of many intellectual traditions, including cybernetics, systems theory, early AI research, the study of cellular automata, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, agent-based modeling, non-linear dynamics, fractal geometry, chaos theory, network science, metacybernetics, and complex systems theory.
2. In general, a complex system is composed of many interacting or interconnected parts. As such, these systems can be formally represented by networks, where the network’s topology determines its function.
3. Emergence refers to the phenomenon whereby a system exhibits properties that cannot be deduced solely by analyzing its individual components. The whole is literally more than the sum of its parts. At each level of complexity, new laws, concepts, and generalizations are necessary. Psychology is not applied biology, biology is not applied chemistry, and chemistry is not applied quantum physics.
4. Emergence is the nemesis of reductionism.
5. To this day, there is no universally accepted, complete, and definitive understanding of what is driving the self-organized structure formation in the universe. In a physicalist framework, this is simply a brute fact.
6. Just as the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics allows insights into the workings of nature, a second “miracle” renders complexity tractable. In the early 1970s, computer scientists discovered that even simple rules could lead to surprising manifestations of complexity. In essence, what appears to be complex behavior from afar often emerges from simple rules of local interactions. As a result, while complex systems remain challenging to analyze with equations, their dynamics can easily be simulated algorithmically.
7. Next to the hard problem of consciousness, emergent complexity is seen by some scholars as a second formidable challenge to the physicalist metaphysics.
8. The complexity of living organisms is truly baffling. In the 1990s, biologists began describing the unexpected intricacy of cells and their metabolic processes in terms of robots, machines, and computers. Today, this mechanistic view of the cell is being augmented by an appreciation for its dynamic, self-organizing nature, the fluidity and plasticity of its components, and the nonlinearity of its underlying
   processes. Then, ontogeny refers to the mysterious developmental process that transforms a zygote into an adult organism. The leap in complexity and organization from two fused cells to the resulting human organic network comprising about 30 trillion cells is simply astounding. This is even more remarkable when considering the complex and unique diversity of the up to 100 trillion symbiotic microorganisms hosted within us — the community of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses, called the microbiota — that are vital for our survival.
9. For you to read this sentence right now, a series of staggering cosmic coincidences had to have transpired:
   • The values of all physical constants appear to be fine-tuned. Moreover, the masses of the proton and neutron are similar and approximately 1,800 times heavier than that of the electron. Any significant deviation from these ratios results in an unrecognizable cosmos. Moreover, the precise value of the vacuum energy seems crucial for our universe to exist in the state we observe to be.
   • Primordial quantum fluctuations acted as seeds for the formation of cosmological structures.
   • Fusion ignited the stars and furnished the first heavy elements, like Carbon and Oxygen, which got scattered into the cosmos when the stars exploded as supernovae.
   • Earth orbits the Sun at just the right distance to support liquid water: the circumstellar habitable zone or the Goldilocks zone.
   • The specific bonding properties of carbon allow for the assembly of information-storing, self-replicating organic structures.
   • The evolution of life on Earth fundamentally depends on the unique anomalous properties of water.
   • Photosynthesis is an uncannily efficient energy-transfer system at the quantum scale, fueling nearly all of life on Earth.
   • Cyanobacteria terraformed an oxygen-filled atmosphere.
   • The Cambrian explosion was an evolutionary burst filling the seas with an unprecedented diversity of living organisms.
   • Insects started to display social behaviors, establishing cooperative interactions as a successful template for evolution.
   • Various mass extinction events repeatedly reshaped the trajectory of evolution.
   • The Cretaceous extinction event resulted in the perishing of non-avian dinosaurs, thrusting mammals from obscurity to prominence and setting the path for their planetary domination.
   • A mass of organic matter, organized as a neural network composed of billions of nodes and trillions of connections, became self-aware.
   • The Cognitive Revolution of Homo sapiens unleashed abstract thinking in the brain, igniting culture, language, and ultimately science.

The Philosophy of Mind

1. There is a physicalist vs. anti-physicalist debate in the philosophy of mind.
2. The physicalist camp focuses on epiphenomenalism, eliminativism, or illusionism, believing that consciousness is just “a bag of tricks,” a “conceptual sleight-of-hand.” By denying the efficacy of consciousness, such perspectives effectively eliminate the hard problem.
3. The anti-physicalists attribute a more prominent role to consciousness, redefining reality in terms that inherently include subjective experience.
4. Panpsychism claims that consciousness is fundamental and ubiquitous. This idea goes back to ancient Greek thinkers. By adding degrees of intrinsically mental properties to the physical, the hard problem is circumvented.
5. Metaphysical idealism posits that reality is fundamentally and exclusively mental. In other words, it claims that consciousness is the essence of existence, with everything physical being derived from a ground of purely transpersonal, aperspectival, and unconditioned mentality, a non-physical field of consciousness. This perspective is currently witnessing a renaissance.
6. Idealism places the experiential quality of consciousness at the center of its ontology, valuing the phenomenal reports of shamans, mystics, meditators, and psychonauts. Indeed, the philosophy of psychedelics is a nascent field within the philosophy of mind, focusing on how altered states of consciousness can deepen our understanding of subjective experience and the nature of reality.
7. Various observations and phenomena make the nature of consciousness seem even more mysterious:
   • In 2007, The Lancet reported the case of a man missing about 90% of his brain. While his IQ was low, he led a normal life and was married with two children.
   • Another case reported of a teenager who was born without the entire left hemisphere of her brain. Despite missing the area that is typically specialized for language, she has above-average reading skills.
   • Vivid, sometimes life-changing near-death experiences have been documented during the absence of brain activity.
   • Savant syndrome can be induced by severe head trauma. In other words, brain damage can unlock novel and remarkable capabilities within consciousness.
   • Reduced brain activity is measured during phenomenally rich psychedelic experiences.
   • It is not unusual for psychedelic experiences to be described as feeling more real than sober waking reality, despite them transcending rationality, common sense, space, and time.
   • Vivid dreams have been reported during g-force induced loss of consciousness.
   • False awakening entails dreaming that one has awoken and is beginning to experience what seems indistinguishable in vividness and coherence from waking reality.
8. Is now the time to critically assess our implicit metaphysical beliefs? Can we accept that existence extends beyond the constraints of the seemingly physical realm, embracing a multiverse of pure experience accessible to consciousness? Can we reimagine a metaphysical framework that unites the objective findings of modern science with the rich, subjective tapestry of human experience, offering a more
   holistic understanding of reality and consciousness? Are we at the threshold of an empirical metaphysics, accessible to anyone brave enough to venture beyond the comforting familiarity of consensus reality?

—

Agree or disagree with these claims? Want to know more? Interested in the academic references?

Get James B Glattfelder’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

Then check out The Sapient Cosmos: What a Modern-Day Synthesis of Science and Philosophy Teaches Us About the Emergence of Information, Consciousness, and Meaning, available from the 25th of March 2025.