Your Strategy Isn’t Broken. Your Standards Are.
When a business starts underperforming, leadership usually goes looking for a big explanation. Maybe the strategy is wrong. Maybe the company needs a new product. Maybe the technology is outdated. Maybe it’s time to reorganize, rethink the go-to-market strategy, bring in new leadership, or launch another transformation initiative. Sometimes those things are necessary. But after spending a lot of time working with companies at different stages of growth, I’ve found that performance problems often start somewhere much less dramatic: the business simply stopped holding itself to the same standards.
The problem is that declining standards rarely announce themselves. There usually isn’t a moment when everyone agrees that from now on, mediocre performance is acceptable. It happens gradually, through a series of small exceptions that all seem reasonable at the time. A deadline gets missed and there’s a good explanation, so everyone moves on. A manager consistently avoids accountability, but replacing that person would be disruptive. A high performer creates problems for everyone around them, but the numbers are good, so leadership tolerates the behavior. A customer issue that once would have generated an immediate response becomes something the organization learns to live with.
None of those decisions is likely to materially damage the business on its own. That’s exactly why they’re dangerous. Every time leadership accepts something that previously would have been unacceptable, the organization learns that the standard isn’t really the standard. Do that enough times and the exception becomes the operating model.
Culture Is What You Tolerate
Companies spend enormous amounts of time talking about culture. They create values, put them on walls, discuss them at town halls, and build presentations explaining what the organization stands for. Those things can be useful, but they don’t define the culture nearly as much as what happens when somebody violates those values.
If the company says it values excellence but mediocre work is routinely accepted, employees understand the real standard. If accountability is supposedly a core value but missed commitments have no consequences, they understand that too. And if leadership talks about teamwork while allowing a high-performing executive to make everyone around them miserable, the organization quickly figures out which value actually matters more.
People pay attention to what leadership does, particularly when doing the right thing is inconvenient or uncomfortable. That’s where culture is really established. Culture isn’t simply what leadership says it expects. It’s what leadership repeatedly allows.
Small Compromises Eventually Show Up in the Numbers
Declining standards initially look like a people problem or an operational problem. Eventually, they become a financial problem.
A little less urgency becomes slower execution. Slower execution means missed opportunities. Weak accountability creates more mistakes, which creates rework, which creates additional cost. Customer issues take longer to resolve, satisfaction declines, retention gets harder, and your best employees become frustrated because they’re constantly compensating for people who aren’t performing at the same level.
Eventually, margins compress, growth slows, and management starts missing the plan. At that point, everyone starts searching for the strategic problem. But what looks like a strategy problem may actually be the downstream consequence of dozens of standards that were allowed to deteriorate over the previous several years.
That distinction matters because you can have exactly the right strategy and still have a business that is incapable of executing it.
Strategy Can’t Compensate for Weak Execution
In private equity, there’s obviously an investment thesis behind every company. There are growth assumptions, operational opportunities, strategic initiatives, and a plan for creating value. But the investment thesis doesn’t create enterprise value by itself. The organization executing against it every day does.
You can have an incredible growth strategy, but if the organization takes three weeks to make decisions that should take three days, you have a problem. You can invest millions in new technology, but if people don’t follow basic processes, the technology isn’t going to fix the business. You can make another acquisition, but if accountability is already weak, you may simply scale the problem along with the revenue. And you can hire incredibly talented executives, but if the organization tolerates bad behavior from high performers, eventually some of your best people will decide they’d rather work somewhere else.
Get Joe Zuk’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
There is always another strategic initiative available, which is part of what makes them so tempting. Launching something new feels like progress. Fixing something old often just feels like management. But management is where a tremendous amount of value gets created.
Growth Makes Standards Harder to Maintain
Maintaining standards is relatively straightforward when a company has 30 employees and the founder knows everybody. It becomes much harder at 300 employees, and harder again at 3,000. As companies scale, leadership gets further away from the places where standards are actually enforced. You add management layers, business units, geographies, and acquired companies. Different teams develop different habits and different definitions of what constitutes acceptable performance.
This becomes particularly important in businesses growing through acquisition. When you acquire a company, you aren’t just integrating systems, processes, and financial statements. You’re integrating expectations. How quickly do people respond to customers? Who owns a problem when something goes wrong? How quickly are decisions made? What happens when somebody misses a commitment? How good does something have to be before the organization considers it good enough?
Those can sound like soft cultural questions. They aren’t. They’re operating questions, and eventually they become financial questions.
Resetting Standards Is Harder Than Maintaining Them
Once an organization has accepted something for long enough, changing it can be surprisingly difficult. If leadership suddenly decides that something is no longer acceptable, employees quite reasonably wonder why it’s a problem now when they’ve been doing it that way for the last two years.
The uncomfortable answer is that leadership taught them it was acceptable.
That’s why resetting standards can’t just mean sending an email announcing that expectations are changing. Leadership has to demonstrate the new standard consistently. That might mean changing how meetings are run, establishing clearer ownership, measuring things that weren’t measured before, or having difficult conversations with people who have been allowed to underperform for too long. Sometimes it means recognizing that a person who was right for the business three years ago isn’t the right person for where the business needs to go next.
Those decisions aren’t always comfortable, but avoiding uncomfortable decisions is often how standards deteriorated in the first place.
Before You Reinvent the Business, Fix the Fundamentals
When performance stalls, there’s a natural temptation to search for something transformational. Before doing that, I think leadership teams should ask themselves some much simpler questions. What do we tolerate today that we wouldn’t have tolerated three years ago? Where have our expectations quietly slipped? What problems does everyone know about but nobody really owns? Where are good employees compensating for weak ones? What customer complaints have become normal? What parts of the business take twice as long as they should?
Those questions aren’t as exciting as developing a new strategy, implementing a new technology platform, or launching a new product. But the answers may be much more valuable.
Businesses rarely wake up one morning and discover that they’ve become mediocre. Mediocrity accumulates gradually through hundreds of small decisions about what is and isn’t acceptable. One exception becomes two. One missed commitment becomes routine. One difficult conversation gets postponed until everyone has learned that the underlying behavior will be tolerated.
Eventually, the consequences show up in the financials, and then the market exposes them. From the outside, it can look like competition, technology, economic conditions, or some other external force damaged the business. Sometimes that’s true. But external pressure often just reveals weaknesses that have been developing internally for years.
Before you reinvent the strategy, make sure you haven’t simply lowered the standards required to execute it.
