I Try: Love Is
What does it mean to try? Is it a minimal, maximal, or moderate effort in general? Or, is it specifically context dependent? Driven by unknown variables, or rationalized constants? Do you think about it before “it” happens? Define at will…
Is this the only real “IT” giving life to shared-context, yet made fully understood above the altered states of medievalism?
Perhaps it is the ciphering definition of “it” that limits the how’s of why a person tries at all.
At any rate, the impetus for trying is effort, and a minimal amount of effort doesn’t necessarily represent a minimal amount of love. In fact, to try at all in circumstances when nobody else might care creates force multiplication in terms of systems-science.
For example, where small “objects” can gravitationally move much larger objects (similar to watch gears) through use of LaGrange physics, a proportional function enables the likes of many defined intents; inclusively building raport among a snowballing constituency of able bodies.
To “try” is a representation of faith, at least conceptually. You may not have complete faith in a matter, however are willing to try for, or on behalf of some delineated context for an extended amount, depending on results.
Here’s the quandary. Even in circumstances when you are barely able to try at all, you may care the most. For example, watch gears “meshed” together centrifugally require the torque needed to produce perfect delivery of time.
Get Joseph A Sprute’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The stacking of gears can represent “Players” (Instruments) subject to the production of any intended end-state. Hence, the exactness of knowing “why” gives light to whatever energy is producing the intended-movement.
So if there were a social-design for “righteousness”, let’s say putting the Earth back in order for the first time, then the number of Instruments subject to any individual input might create circumstance(s) where kinetic energy could be harnessed for the greater good. Impetus for change.
A reason to “try”… a hunch or knowledge of something “better”…
True, few will recognize the potential of what is to be created before it’s completely produced, though a well-formed vision communicated en mass represents a Constitutional Order for building reasoned-capacity and a formidable existence for those concerned.
Love, as a standard cannot be measured. Except by happiness.
However, at least in theory… “it”, delivery as such (love) can be given to those who are in need, so every sustainable ounce of prevention will produce tons of cure.
Try in order to achieve proportionality. This is love.
I believe…
