What If Yoga Was Never About Postures?
Home / The Satsang blog/ The Revelation
What Is Original Yoga?
A Spiritual Path at the Source of All Traditions
This text is inspired by a chapter from the book:
Long before Genesis, a Sumerian text described a garden where the lion did not kill and no one wept. This memory of a lost harmony turns up from the Tao to the Gospels, from the Upanishads to the Hebrew prophets. Original yoga offers a way back to it through a practice each person verifies for themselves rather than through belief. That is the first meaning of the word yoga, long before the postures.
The spiritual Path stands within this continuity, without merging with any of these forms, and without claiming to precede or surpass them. To speak of original-Yoga is not to claim historical precedence. It is to name a return to what is essential: what can be lived directly, with no dogmatic system, and what came before all the modern forms of yoga, so often practiced today with no mystical aim at all.
The Sanskrit root yuj, from which yoga derives, belongs to the same family as the word yoke, which gave the Greek zugon. It may not be without meaning that Jesus, in the Gospel, invited those listening to him to take up his yoke, adding that it was easy and light. To be yoked, in this light, has nothing to do with servitude: it puts an end to scatteredness.
Traditions that have most closely observed this center gave it a name: . This is where the essence of the embodied soul resides: the , the one who watches, the . A more intimate question remains.
The citta, for its part, is a mixed entity, much like lichen. The , , which allows one to say “I” and to exercise free will, is there inseparable from the mind, from the cognitive and perceptual functions, from the upkeep of the body’s metabolic functions. Distinct in their function, the alga and the fungus form, in their working together, only a single organism.
The jivatman is born of this yoking: the citta, entire, harnessed to the purusha, that spiritual core which incarnation harnesses to its instruments so that it may say “I,” choose, act, and bear the consequences of its actions.
The jivatman is not an illusion to be dissolved. It is a living reality, called not to disappear but to grow finer, clearer, and to come into harmony with what it has always carried within itself without knowing it.
Get Benoit Jean’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Verify Rather Than Believe
One may wonder why take up one more practice, in a life that has no shortage of them. Living, loving, succeeding, understanding: these aims are legitimate, and nothing here disputes them. But it happens that everything is in place, or nearly, and a background dissatisfaction remains, without one always being able to name it.
This is not a failure. It is something many people notice, sooner or later: ordinary goals change the conditions of life; they do not always change the way one lives them.
That is where a quieter question may arise: no longer “what should I do with my life?” but “how do I find and live what is essential again?” The Path does not answer the first question, though it has a view on the matter; it answers the second, without asking anyone to believe in it beforehand. It simply offers the means to verify it.
This verification does not rest on an idea. It rests on a repeated practice, a sadhana, built around a few simple pillars, practices, and ethical guidelines. The most important is the , that living presence other traditions have called ; the virtue of the Tao, or Shabda-Brahman .
The traditions can be followed one by one, theme by theme, without seeking to blend them. What the spiritual Path affirms does not contradict them: there are not several fundamental truths, but a single reality, unfolding through an infinity of expressions, according to cultures, eras, and languages.
Merging the traditions into one another would be a mistake: they already carry, deep down, one and the same reality, perceived differently. Another image says it in its own way: the traditions are maps, the truth is the territory. The mistake is to confuse the two, to take the description for the thing described.
Elsewhere in the same book, the same vision closes on a still more intimate image: the wolf dwelling with the lamb, and “a little child shall lead them” (Isaiah 11:6). Nothing suggests that one text knew the other. And yet the same peace is described there, in almost the same terms, as if Man, wherever he sought to say what he had lost, had ended up using the same images to say it.
The Tao itself is equivalent to the : the Totality. Its virtue, what it carries and what it gives, The Path calls Holy-Name; others have named it Fundamental Harmony, or Shabda-Brahman, the virtue of : one and the same reality under different names.
What was sought far away turns out, for whoever takes the time to look, never to have ceased being there since the beginning.
If you have any questions, please write here: madhyama.marga@gmail.com
Originally published at https://www.yoga-originel.fr on October 17, 2026.
