Clicks, Content, Credibility: Social Media’s Harmful Role in Presidential Election Campaigns
A candidate posts a meme. A campaign account jumps on the latest trending TikTok sound. A political video gets millions of views within hours.
Sounds like a successful modern campaign strategy, right?
Not necessarily.
Many communication experts argue that political organizations have little choice but to adapt to social media culture. After all, a growing number of Americans get their news from platforms like TikTok, X, Instagram, and Facebook. According to the Pew Research Center, 59% of U.S. adults say they get news from social media at least sometimes, demonstrating how influential these platforms have become.
While social media may help campaigns reach voters, there is a growing concern that politicians are trading substance for engagement. The real question is not whether social media gets attention, but whether it helps citizens become better-informed voters.
More Engagement Doesn’t Mean More Understanding
The strongest argument for platform-native communication is that it increases engagement. Memes, short videos, and viral posts attract likes, comments, and shares far more effectively than traditional press releases.
However, engagement metrics do not measure understanding.
Complex political issues such as healthcare reform, immigration policy, economic strategy, or foreign affairs are difficult to explain in a TikTok video or Instagram reel. When campaigns prioritize content designed for quick consumption, they can oversimplify important issues. Voters may remember a catchy slogan or viral moment but know very little about the actual policy behind it.
In other words, being informed and entertained are not the same thing.
Politics is Becoming Entertainment
Social media platforms reward content that generates emotional reactions. Because of this, political organizations increasingly communicate like influencers rather than public institutions.
The result is a political environment where humor, trends, and internet culture often receive more attention than policy discussions.
Researchers have expressed concern that social media environments can contribute to polarization and encourage users to seek information that reinforces preexisting beliefs. A systematic review of 94 studies found that exposure to like-minded political content often intensifies political polarization rather than encouraging thoughtful discussion.
When political communication starts looking more like entertainment content, citizens may engage more with personalities and viral moments than with actual governing issues.
Young Voters Need Information, Not Just Visibility
Many advocates of social media campaigning argue that these strategies successfully reach younger audiences. That claim is true. Young adults are among the most active consumers of news and information through social platforms.
Get Lazarzanna’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
However, reaching voters is only one part of democratic participation.
Researchers from Tufts University CIRCLE found that social media plays a major role in how young people receive political information, but it also emphasizes the importance of media literacy skills to evaluate what they encounter online.
If political organizations focus solely on gaining attention, they risk creating politically engaged audiences who lack the information necessary to evaluate candidates, policies, and issues critically.
Traditional Communication Still Has Value
Supporters of platform-native communication often describe traditional messaging as outdated. Yet formal speeches, policy statements, debates, interviews, and press releases continue to serve an important purpose.
These formats provide context.
Unlike a meme or a thirty-second clip, long-form communication allows political leaders to explain proposals, provide evidence, and answer questions in greater depth. While these messages may not go viral, they often offer voters a clearer understanding of what candidates actually stand for.
The goal of political communication should not simply be to capture attention. It should be to increase public understanding.
The Bottom Line
Social media has undoubtedly changed politics, and campaigns cannot ignore the platforms where voters spend their time. However, the growing dependence on memes, trends, and viral content raises important concerns. While these strategies increase visibility, they can also oversimplify complex issues, blur the lines between politics and entertainment, and contribute to a less informed electorate.
Democracy requires more than engagement. It requires understanding. If political communication becomes focused only on what performs well online, voters may gain more content while receiving less information. Political engagement should use social media as a gateway to deeper information rather than a replacement for it. Short-form content can attract attention, but voters should also be directed towards debates, policy platforms, and long-form discussions. Effective political communication balances engagement with education.
References
Forman-Katz, N., Lipka, M., Matsa, K. E., Radde, K., Baronavski, C., & Coleman, J. (2025, December 3). Young adults and the future of news. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2025/12/03/young-adults-and-the-future-of-news/
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. Taylor & Francis Online. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
Liedke, J., & St. Aubin, C. (2024, September 17). Social media and news fact sheet. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/
Proven political campaign social media strategies. (2022, April 18). Www.Onlinecandidate.Com. https://www.onlinecandidate.com/articles/tips-political-social-media-campaigns
rosarioja. (2022, December 15). Analyzing social media images used in political communication. The NULab for Digital Humanities and Computational Social Science. https://cssh.northeastern.edu/nulab/social-media-images-in-politics/
Seigel-Stechler, K., Hilton, K., & Medina, A. (2025, May 12). Youth rely on digital platforms, need media literacy to access political information. Civicyouth. https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/youth-rely-digital-platforms-need-media-literacy-access-political-information
