Why Multitasking Is Slowing You Down: Lessons from “The Name Game”
In today’s fast-paced work environments, multitasking is often a status symbol. The more you can do at once, the busier and more productive you’re perceived to be. But when you’re doing Agile collaboration — or leading one as a Scrum Master — such a mindset can come back to haunt you. That’s the void that multitasking games for the work place like “The Name Game” fill: simple, interactive activities that make the unseen costs of multitasking clear as glass.
What Is “The Name Game”?
The Name Game” is a dynamic and engaging multitasking activity employed in Scrum Master training and Agile workshops. Members of the audience are divided into groups in which one person is the “worker” and the others are “customers,” and each of them asks for their name to be written down. The catch? The worker has to write down all of the names letter by letter, circling the customers before finishing any one name.
What occurs? Delays. Frustration. And a large “aha” moment: context switching lowers output and raises stress significantly. It is an easy game, but the lesson remains with you.
The True Cost of Multitasking
Tests repeatedly demonstrate that multitasking decreases productivity by as much as 40%. In Agile environments, it quite frequently results in:
- Higher cycle times
- Lower quality outputs
- Reduced team morale
- Hidden work in progress
The Name Game” makes these findings explicit. By focusing on one name at a time instead of switching back and forth between them, the worker completes work more quickly with fewer mistakes, as Agile teams do when they focus on one user story or feature at a time.
How Scrum Masters Apply This in Training
Most veteran Agile coaches employ multitasking games for the workplace, particularly in Scrum Master classes, to illustrate the strength of focus. Following the game, the teams discuss what they noticed and how that can be relevant to their own workplaces:
Get Lithespeed’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Do we always change tasks in a sprint?
- Are we doing too many projects at one time?
- How do we minimize context switching in order to enhance flow?
- This exercise offers the key to real behavior change, not just theory.
Multitasking in the Agile AI Era
As AI is increasingly being utilized within Agile frameworks, it’s valuable to know how individuals and computers multitask differently. Agile AI instruments can prioritize and manage large volumes of data without efficiency loss, but humans cannot. That is why the adoption of AI is not only about automation, but also about improving the ability to focus.
Consider an Agile team leveraging AI to manage backlog grooming or sprint analysis so that the team members can be distraction-free to deliver value. However, for that to work, the team would need to acknowledge and minimize human multitasking in the first place.
Case Study: How a Financial Services Team Changed Flow
One of the customers of LitheSpeed — a financial services organization — applied “The Name Game” as a part of their Agile adoption. Their development team frequently had 8–10 work items in progress per person. After noticing how single-tasking had made “The Name Game” quicker, the team implemented WIP (Work In Progress) limits and minimized task-switching.
Within two months:
- Their sprint speed at 30% enhanced
- Quality flaws decreased by 40%
- And team members reported higher satisfaction
It started as a game, but ended in real consequences.
Takeaway:
Play the Game, Change the Culture. If you are a Scrum Master, team leader, or on an Agile transformation team, “The Name Game” is one of the most useful work multitasking games you can play. It is not fun — it is about building awareness, enhancing team flow, and instilling the habits that result in agility at scale.
In the AI-driven future, the organizations that gain focus, not just automation, will lead the way. Start with a name. Finish with transformation.
