Why Free Education Isn’t Actually Free — And How We Fix That
Row A | Edition 001
There’s a lie we tell ourselves in EdTech.
We say: “Education should be free.” We post it on LinkedIn. We put it in our pitch decks. We mean it, genuinely. And then we watch free platforms shut down, free courses get abandoned, and free tools quietly add a paywall six months after launch.
Because free isn’t a business model. It’s a starting point.
I learned this the hard way.
When I started building in EdTech, I was obsessed with access. I grew up watching people around me get left behind — not because they weren’t smart enough, not because they didn’t want to learn, but because the price of entry was too high. A textbook. A course fee. A stable internet connection. A laptop that wasn’t six years old.
So I said: we’ll make it free.
And for a while, that felt like the right answer.
But here’s the thing nobody talks about at EdTech conferences, between the panels on “disrupting the classroom” and the cocktail hours sponsored by venture funds: someone always pays. If the student isn’t paying, an investor is. And when the investor stops, the platform dies — and with it, every learner who depended on it.
We’ve seen this cycle play out over and over. Promising platforms, genuine missions, real impact — gone. Not because the founders didn’t care. Because caring doesn’t cover server costs.
So what’s the actual fix?
Get Artem Melnyk’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
I don’t think the answer is “charge everyone full price and call it premium.” That just recreates the problem with a different price tag.
The answer — the one I’m building toward — lives in the tension between sustainability and access. It looks something like this:
The people who can pay, pay. And that payment funds access for the people who can’t. Not as charity. Not as a PR move. As a structural decision baked into the business model from day one.
Think of it like a cross-subsidy. Airlines do it. Museums do it. Spotify does it. The premium tier isn’t just a revenue stream — it’s the mechanism that keeps the free tier alive and real, not crippled.
This means building a product genuinely worth paying for — not a locked-down version of something mediocre, but something so good that people want to pay, because it gives them real leverage in their careers, their businesses, their lives.
And it means being honest with your users from the start. Not hiding behind “freemium” language that obscures a bait-and-switch. Radical transparency: here’s what’s free, here’s what’s paid, here’s exactly why, and here’s how your subscription is directly enabling someone else’s access.
Why I’m writing this
Row A exists because I think this conversation needs to happen more openly — between founders, educators, investors, and learners.
Every edition, I’ll be writing about the real mechanics of building education that’s both accessible and sustainable. The business models. The product decisions. The failures. The things that actually work.
No theory. No inspiration porn. Just the view from the front row.
Pull up a chair. Front row’s open.
If this resonated, subscribe to Row A and share it with one person building in education. That’s all I ask.
https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/row-a-7435496018378551296/
