Sitemap

Stop Treating EBITDA Like It’s Cash in the Bank

4 min readOct 25, 2025

--

Press enter or click to view image in full size
EBITDA might sparkle on paper, but it’s not the cash in your bank account.

The first time I saw a deal with $450K in EBITDA, I thought I’d found a gem.

On paper, it looked great. The broker was all smiles. The seller said something like, “We’re basically printing money.” I wanted to believe it.

But after digging in, it turned out they were weeks behind on payroll, owed back taxes, and the walk-in freezer was dying a slow, wheezing death.

That was my wake-up call. EBITDA might look like profit. It might feel like cash flow. But it’s not. Not even close.

So What Is EBITDA, Anyway?

Let’s keep it simple. EBITDA stands for Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. But nobody really thinks in those terms unless they’re wearing a suit and holding a spreadsheet.

Here’s how I think about it:

EBITDA is what a business earns before the real world steps in.

It strips out interest payments (because financing varies), tax obligations (which can be delayed or reduced), and depreciation and amortization (non-cash accounting entries that make things look cleaner than they are).

So on one hand, it helps normalize performance. That’s helpful when comparing deals across industries, tax structures, or financing strategies.

But here’s the thing: EBITDA isn’t money you can spend.

You can’t buy inventory with it. You can’t make payroll with it. And you definitely can’t fix the broken freezer with it.

Learn more about how EBITDA works on Investopedia.

For a clearer comparison, check this breakdown of EBITDA vs. cash flow from Corporate Finance Institute (CFI).

Why People Love It (And Why You Shouldn’t Blindly Trust It)

There’s a reason brokers lead with EBITDA.

It makes businesses look good. Clean. Profitable. “Optimized,” if you’re feeling generous.

And yes, it does serve a purpose:

  • It gives a standardized view of operating performance
  • It helps calculate rough valuations using earnings multiples
  • It avoids distortion from depreciation schedules or aggressive tax positions

But let’s be honest: it can also smooth over the ugly stuff.

You’ve probably seen it. That nice round number sitting there like it’s gospel. $300K. $450K. Maybe even $1M. It looks solid until you remember to ask, “Yeah, but how much actual cash did this business throw off last year?”

That’s the question that matters.

Here’s a quick overview of how EBITDA multiples are used in valuations.

Why EBITDA and Cash Flow Are Not the Same Thing

Press enter or click to view image in full size
Here’s the visual reality: EBITDA tells part of the story, but cash flow tells the truth.

Let me paint a quick picture.

Get Monte B.’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Imagine a business shows $500K in EBITDA.

Sounds healthy, right? But then you notice a few things:

  • They’re paying $50K a year in interest
  • Taxes are about $60K
  • CapEx? A cool $100K annually, minimum
  • Working capital needs have ballooned by $40K

Do the math. What you’re really looking at is maybe $250K in free cash flow. Maybe less, depending on how creative their accounting is.

That’s a big gap. And it’s why treating EBITDA like cash is a fast way to get burned.

The Problem Hiding in Plain Sight

Here’s what gets overlooked:

  • Depreciation isn’t real cash, but the things being depreciated still break down
  • Taxes might be deferred, but they don’t disappear
  • Capital expenditures are lumpy, but they’re also unavoidable
  • Working capital spikes at the worst times (like right before busy season)

I’ve looked at deals where EBITDA looked solid, but cash flow was a mess. Aging receivables, big equipment needs, unpaid vendor balances, all hiding behind a clean P&L.

You’d think I’d learn after the first time. But it took a few “almost-deals” to really absorb it.

A Few Sanity Checks I Always Run Now

Whenever someone hands me a deal summary with a big EBITDA number, I don’t ignore it. But I don’t fall in love with it either.

Instead, I ask:

  • What did they spend on new equipment last year?
  • How much cash went out the door in interest and taxes?
  • Is working capital stable, or are they robbing Peter to pay Paul every Q4?
  • Can I find the same story in the tax returns?

If I don’t like the answers, I start to treat that EBITDA number as a guess (not a promise).

Final Thought: It’s Just a Starting Point

EBITDA is fine. It’s helpful. But it’s the start of the conversation, not the conclusion.

It gives you a rough idea of how the business runs before the noise of financing and tax planning. But cash flow is what matters when it’s your name on the bank account. It’s what you use to pay staff, cover shortfalls, and invest in growth.

So yeah, look at EBITDA. Just don’t stop there.

Because when it’s your deal, your money, and your risk?
Only one number tells you the truth. And that number isn’t EBITDA.

--

--