THE UNIVERSE DON’T NEED YOUR PERMISSION!
Scientific definitions can classify planets and brown dwarfs, but they cannot dictate physical reality or establish conclusions beyond what the evidence supports.
PRODUCER: RITA KATRINA HIGGINS
Somewhere in the Milky Way, a giant planet got kicked out of its solar system. No farewell party. No forwarding address. No complimentary fruit basket. One minute it was orbiting a star; the next, it was sailing through interstellar space, minding its own planetary business. Its mass was still there, its composition was substantially intact, and its formation history hadn’t disappeared. Yes, we’re assuming a non-disruptive gravitational encounter. Artistic license. The planet gets to leave with its luggage. And considering what some people expect a scientific definition to accomplish, this is a remarkably modest liberty.
Unfortunately, somebody on Earth had a definition, and that meant trouble. Somewhere in an astronomical office, a very important person was about to discover that the planet no longer satisfied the membership requirements. The planet, meanwhile, was approximately a million miles past caring. Then Rita heard about it, AND SOMEBODY HANDED HER A MICROPHONE.
“THE UNIVERSE DON’T NEED YOUR PERMISSION!” is 144 beats per minute of scientific insubordination, powered by an overdriven blues-rock guitarist with the manners of a demolition crew, a barrelhouse pianist who considers restraint a medical condition, a swaggering bassist, and a drummer who apparently believes that every scientific disagreement can be resolved with a sufficiently violent snare drum. The guitarist opens with a thick, snarling riff, dragging the notes through vintage tube-amp distortion. The drummer comes charging in with a backbeat that could knock a telescope off its mounting. The bass digs into a rolling groove, and the pianist answers with a wicked blues flourish, apparently announcing that the proceedings are already out of control.
Then Rita starts singing. A big old planet lost its star, got kicked clean out, and traveled far. Somebody opened a book, put on a crown, and announced, “YOU’RE NOT A PLANET NOW!” The guitarist answers with a rude, descending riff, the pianist supplies a musical raspberry, and the planet? Still traveling. Apparently, nobody remembered to install the emergency brakes.
So is it still a planet? In ordinary astronomical language, an object like this may be called a rogue planet or free-floating planet because it has planetary characteristics but no longer orbits a star. More cautious classifications use free-floating planetary-mass object, especially when its formation history is uncertain. Astronomers do not universally agree on where every boundary should fall. The International Astronomical Union’s 2006 Solar System definition requires a planet to orbit the Sun, among other conditions, but that definition was expressly written for our Solar System. It does not settle the status of every planet-sized object wandering between the stars.
The physical point is simpler. The planet has lost an orbital relationship, not necessarily its mass, composition, internal structure, or formation history. Its gravitational encounter was real, and any physical alterations caused by that encounter must be investigated. But changing its classification does not itself change the object. The label cannot do the investigation.
Here is what Rita is raising hell about. Scientists are free to define categories, and those categories can be extremely useful. But a definition is a rule for classifying something, not a command issued to the universe. If a planet loses its star, its orbit has changed; its entire physical identity has not necessarily changed with it. If an object burns deuterium, the nuclear reaction is real; the particular mass chosen as a dividing line depends on the criteria being used. In both cases, the question is the same: What has physically changed, what has actually been measured, and what does the evidence justify? That is why Rita keeps demanding, “WHAT’S THAT DEFINITION GOOD FOR?”
Unfortunately, the imaginary Interstellar Department of Planetary Credentials has already opened a branch office and adopted its own universal registration requirement, apparently without consulting the universe. A clerk peers over his glasses. “Name?” “Giant planet.” “Former star?” “Lost it.” “Current orbital registration?” “None.” The clerk stamps the application REJECTED. “But it’s still a giant planet!” “Not according to this form.” The pianist slams down a tremendous chord. BANG! “Sir, this is a government office.” BAAANG! “Sir, threatening the classification system with a piano is a violation of departmental policy.” The guitarist fires off a nasty blues bend that sounds suspiciously like a complaint being fed through a wood chipper. The clerk reaches for the telephone, but the drummer interrupts with a tremendous snare roll, then stops so abruptly that the clerk finds himself shouting “SECURITY!” into a dead silence. The bassist keeps walking, the planet keeps traveling, and Rita is just getting warmed up.
And now somebody has brought up a different classification problem: the thirteen-Jupiter-mass boundary. THIRTEEN JUPITERS! Instead of asking whether an object orbits a star, astronomers are asking whether its mass and nuclear-burning behavior place it among giant planets or brown dwarfs. Thirteen Jupiter masses means approximately thirteen times Jupiter’s mass, not thirteen planets lined up in space. Brown dwarfs are objects generally too small to sustain ordinary hydrogen fusion like stars but potentially massive enough to burn deuterium, a heavier form of hydrogen.
Deuterium burning is genuine nuclear physics. As a substellar object’s mass increases, its interior generally becomes hotter and more compressed, making deuterium burning possible and potentially more extensive. But how much deuterium must an object consume before somebody declares that it qualifies? Ten percent? Half? Ninety percent? And what about differences in composition and internal conditions? Those choices matter. The universe does not post a sign at exactly thirteen Jupiter masses announcing, “CONGRATULATIONS! YOU ARE NOW A BROWN DWARF!”
Get R L Higgins’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Spiegel, Burrows, and Milsom examined this question using evolutionary models. Under different assumptions about composition and the fraction of deuterium consumed, their calculated thresholds ranged from approximately eleven to 16.3 Jupiter masses. Those numbers represent different modeled conditions and criteria, not rival measurements of one universal boundary. Thirteen Jupiter masses is a widely used approximate dividing line associated with the onset and extent of deuterium burning. The researchers also examined a fifty-percent consumption benchmark — one particular way to quantify how much deuterium an object burns, rather than a universally required definition of a brown dwarf. Eleven here. Sixteen there. Thirteen in the middle. The nuclear reactions are real, but the chosen numerical dividing line is not a magical transformation point.
The pianist stops playing. This is serious. He takes off his imaginary spectacles, examines the keyboard, and plays thirteen notes. The clerk nods approvingly. “Very good. Thirteen. That’s our number.” The pianist plays eleven. “That’s not the official threshold,” the clerk protests. The pianist plays sixteen. “YOU CAN’T KEEP CHANGING THE NUMBER!” The pianist looks delighted. He plays seventeen, nine, fourteen, and twenty-three notes, then runs both hands up the keyboard in a spectacular glissando. The guitarist joins in, bending one note so outrageously that the clerk begins looking for the decimal point. The drummer contributes a furious tom roll, while the bassist refuses to count anything. Somewhere, a brown dwarf is considering hiring an accountant.
Now Rita comes charging into the argument. “WHAT’S THAT DEFINITION GOOD FOR?” The band stops. “SHOW THE EVIDENCE!” BANG! “SHOW THE TEST!” BAAANG! “SHOW WHAT CHANGED!” The guitarist answers with a ripping, distorted run. “AND WHAT STAYED THE REST!” The piano pounds out a boogie-woogie figure while the bass digs deeper into the groove. The chairman hastily produces a chart. “This definition establishes the object’s dynamical category!” Rita nods. “GOOD! NOW WHAT DOES IT TELL YOU ABOUT ITS INSIDES?” The chairman looks down at the chart. Nothing. “AND HOW IT WAS FORMED?” He turns the chart upside down. Still nothing. “THEN WHY ARE YOU WAVING IT AROUND LIKE IT’S THE WHOLE PLANET?” The pianist plays a short, sarcastic flourish.
Higgins’s Structural Systems Analysis asks what a classification measures, what physical evidence supports it, and which conclusions that evidence permits. Dynamical criteria, nuclear-burning models, and numerical thresholds can each serve legitimate scientific purposes. But none automatically establishes everything about an object’s composition, history, or internal structure. The chairman’s chart cannot suddenly acquire that missing information merely because somebody printed PLANET or BROWN DWARF across the top.
And now the music starts getting dangerous. The guitar and piano launch into a snarling call-and-response battle. The guitarist fires off a jagged blues phrase; the pianist answers with a rolling barrelhouse run. The drummer punctuates each exchange with sharp snare accents while the bass holds the whole unruly operation together. Rita switches from smoky, rhythmic phrasing to a wicked little croon. “You got a label?” The band freezes. “HOW CUTE!” The pianist supplies three dainty notes, as though presenting the chairman with a tiny decorative certificate. Ha ha ha! “You got a definition?” The guitarist plays an absurdly pompous fanfare. “BIG! FREAKING! DEAL!” The drummer responds with three tremendous crashes.
Somewhere in the back row, an astronomer raises a hand. “Could we at least agree that deuterium burning is real?” The pianist stops. Rita nods. “OF COURSE IT’S REAL!” The astronomer looks relieved. Then Rita points straight at him. “NOW SHOW ME WHY YOUR NUMBER GETS TO RULE THE WHOLE FREAKING UNIVERSE!” The guitarist answers with a shrieking blues solo, and this time he has no intention of surrendering the floor.
He tears into a jagged, overdriven phrase, holds the final note until it sounds ready to burst, then bends it upward in a long, furious wail. The drummer drives a pounding backbeat underneath while the bassist locks into a heavy, swaggering groove. The guitarist launches another phrase, faster and nastier. The pianist tries to answer, but the guitar cuts him off with a screaming bend. The piano retaliates with a lightning-fast run. The guitarist fires back with a snarling riff that sends the drummer into a rolling tom barrage. The chairman is now crouching beneath the conference table, his assistant is trying to save the minutes, the clerk from the planetary registration office has gone home, and the pianist has taken his chair.
The guitarist hits one final, outrageous high note and lets it hang over the entire room. The drummer stops. The piano stops. The bass stops. The note hangs there, trembling. Then the drummer delivers one savage snare crack, and the whole band crashes back into the groove. Rita steps forward. “You got a label?” “HOW CUTE!” “You got a definition?” “BIG! FREAKING! DEAL!” The piano hammers out a descending boogie-woogie figure, the guitarist answers with a vicious blues bend, and the drummer snaps the band into a series of stop-time hits.
Rita is preparing the final question. “YOU GOT THE EVIDENCE?” Silence. “THEN!” BANG! “SHOW!” BAAANG! “IT!” The drummer unleashes a rolling barrage across the toms. “YOU!” The guitarist bends a note until it practically begs for mercy. “CLOWWWWWN!” The pianist starts hammering out a relentless boogie-woogie, the guitarist tears through a screaming final run, and the bassist locks onto the last descending figure. The drummer drives everything toward one colossal synchronized finish as Rita rises above the chaos with her final declaration: “THE UNIVERSE DON’T NEEEEEEEEED YOUR PERMISSION!” BANG! Silence.
The chairman slowly emerges from beneath the table. He straightens his tie, adjusts his glasses, and whispers, “May I remind everyone that this committee has the authority to establish definitions?” A single piano note answers. The chairman freezes. The pianist raises one finger. Then both hands come crashing down on the keyboard, the guitarist lets out one last outrageous shriek, and the entire band delivers a final chord that sends the committee’s nameplates flying across the room. BAAAAAANG! Silence.
Somewhere between the stars, a giant planet continues through interstellar space. Its gravitational encounter was real. Its physical properties remain a matter for physical investigation. The committee has completed its definitions. The pianist has demolished its furniture.
And the universe?
IT NEVER SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION.
Enjoy on YouTube:
