Intelligence caste system
When intelligence determines socioeconomic status (SES).
To be honest, this topic has been on my mind for a long time, and I finally want to share it because it’s rarely discussed. We all know that racism and discrimination are wrong. But strangely, when someone is considered “less intelligent” by society’s standards, people’s empathy seems to vanish.
It’s as if there’s an unspoken hierarchy, where intelligence determines how much a person is valued. People become more patient and willing to listen if the other person is considered smart. But if not, the tone changes immediately — they’re quicker to judge, and kindness feels conditional.
Get nans's journal’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The fact is, the IQ score that people love to brag about only represents a tiny fraction of a person’s overall intelligence. It only measures certain abilities: logic, pattern recognition, working memory, and abstract problem solving. It doesn’t measure emotional intelligence, creativity, empathy, wisdom, social skills, resilience, intuition, practical skills, or countless other forms of human capability. It turns out that very few people ever openly talk about intellectual inequality. It’s like everyone knows it exists, but pretends not to see it or maybe they genuinely don’t realize it. Because if we admit it, we also have to admit that the world we call “fair” can actually be deeply unfair. We’ve become trapped in a culture of intellectual elitism, the belief that anyone with strong analytical skills, high grades, or a high IQ score is automatically more important and more worthy of respect.
The problem is, society often treats intelligence as if it were moral. If you’re smart, you’re considered valuable; if you’re not, you’re seen as a failure. But intelligence is shaped by a mix of genetics, environment, trauma, access to education, nutrition, and many other factors. Yet because the modern world is obsessed with meritocracy, we’re taught that if someone is “not smart enough,” it’s their own fault. But that’s just a social illusion meant to make us feel superior to others. Yes, the so-called superior humans.
The irony is that many people want their children to be smart to have “better” offspring. But at the same time, they don’t realize that this mindset leads them to look down on people who don’t fit the mainstream definition of intelligence. When in reality, people labeled as “low IQ” often have qualities society tends to ignore loyalty, hard work, mental resilience, empathy, craftsmanship, or practical talents that no math exam or IQ test could ever measure.
Indirectly, this intelligence caste system does exist, but just undefined or hidden in our daily lives. But the consequences are very real: many people aren’t heard, aren’t seen as capable, and aren’t given chances simply because they’re viewed as belonging to a lower intellectual class.
According to the scientific article “Socioeconomic Status and the Growth of Intelligence from Infancy through Adolescence”, it is evident that intelligence does not exist in isolation but is significantly influenced by socioeconomic background. From an early age, children from families with higher economic status already demonstrate higher intelligence scores compared to children from less affluent families, and interestingly, this gap widens over time as they grow older. This occurs because the environment also “drives” cognitive development, such as access to education, learning support, and greater opportunities for exploration within certain groups. Consequently, intelligence appears to be a determining factor in a person’s position in society. In the long term, this situation can create a sort of “intelligence caste system,” where groups with high access and cognitive abilities remain at the top, while other groups tend to fall behind and struggle to advance socially.
(Nanda Prs, April 03, 2026).
