The Boys Finale and Self Parody
The finale of The Boys aired last week and Homelander finally got what was coming to him. It was alright.
A lot of the discussion online centered around how pathetic Homelander became in his final moments. Really, the show seemed especially interested in humiliating him all season.
That has always been part of the point of The Boys. Homelander is not meant to be a tragic antihero or misunderstood king. He is a walking ego wound wrapped in a cape and American branding. The satire was never subtle. This season especially leaned heavily into mirroring Trump-era politics, influencer culture, corporate patriotism and the whole MAGA ecosystem. It rarely took shots at the left with the same enthusiasm, but that never really bothered me much. Television writers tend to lean progressive. Water is wet.
What interested me more was a comment from the show’s creator Eric Kripke about Homelander’s final breakdown:
“Take away those powers and you are nothing… most strong men, when you remove their power and they’re faced with imminent death, rarely handle it bravely.”
And I don’t know. There’s something oddly revealing in that statement.
Not because Homelander deserves defending. He’s a monster. But because modern media increasingly feels uncomfortable allowing certain kinds of people — powerful men especially — to possess complexity. They cannot simply be dangerous, charismatic, insecure, intelligent, cruel, funny and human all at once. They must eventually be reduced. Humiliated. Morally flattened into symbols.
The irony is that Homelander is still wildly popular.
People buy the shirts. Share the memes. Quote him online. They enjoy the performance. Some people even sympathize with him despite the show repeatedly screaming, “No, idiot, he’s bad.”
That tension is more interesting than the actual finale.
Creators make art with intended meanings. Audiences then proceed to ignore instructions and do whatever they want anyway. This appears to drive some creators insane. Increasingly, there’s this feeling that audiences are not merely misunderstanding media but failing some kind of moral exam.
You can see smaller versions of this attitude everywhere now. This week there was minor controversy around a developer working on Subnautica 2 responding to a player asking about combat in the game:
Get Null Entity’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
“We aren’t a killing game. Go play Sons of the Forest or something if you want to kill.”
Not the worst thing anyone has ever said online. Certainly not worth a week-long outrage cycle or twelve-hour YouTube essays featuring red arrows and glowing eyes in the thumbnail. But it carried that familiar tone modern audiences immediately recognize: mild contempt.
To the studio’s credit, they later apologized and clarified that feedback from players matters and that communication should not feel dismissive. Which is probably true. But the moment still stuck out because people are increasingly sensitive to feeling talked down to by creators.
Especially creators who publicly champion inclusivity, empathy and community.
That’s where some of the cultural friction comes from right now. Not simply politics, but the feeling that many institutions speak the language of openness while becoming strangely hostile toward disagreement. “Everyone is welcome here” often comes with an invisible asterisk attached.
And to be fair, this is not unique to progressives. Conservatives do it too. Everyone eventually creates a cartoon version of the people they dislike. In the world of The Boys, MAGA supporters are manipulated idiots addicted to outrage and propaganda. In some right-wing spaces, progressives are portrayed as blue-haired censorship goblins trying to chemically castrate children between land acknowledgements.
Round and round it goes.
Eventually everybody becomes a parody of the thing they claim to hate.
That may be the most unintentionally accurate thing about The Boys. Not Homelander himself, but the ecosystem around him: media, politics, outrage, tribal loyalty, audiences sorting themselves into moral camps while insisting the other side has been brainwashed.
The depressing part is how little room any of this leaves for ordinary human complexity.
People are not all good or all evil. Powerful men are not automatically monsters. Progressives are not all authoritarian scolds. Conservatives are not all fascists. Most people are just flawed, emotional, contradictory creatures trying to navigate a culture that increasingly rewards certainty, performance and hatred.
Which is maybe why audiences resist being lectured so hard now.
People do not mind politics in art nearly as much as they mind feeling managed by it. They don’t want every villain to come prepackaged with approved interpretations. They don’t want creators angrily hovering over their shoulder explaining what the story “really means.” They want space to react honestly, even incorrectly.
Because once art starts treating audiences like ideological problems to solve, the audience eventually starts viewing creators the same way.
And then everyone ends up acting like they belong in an episode of The Boys.
