You Didn’t Discover Yourself — You Remembered Yourself Wrong
How distorted memory constructs a false identity — and quietly controls who you believe you are today
Are you and I actually who we think we are, or do we see ourselves in a distorted way based on the memory of who we believe we once were?
What if your life is not discovered through memory — but inaccurately constructed by it?
What if the person you believe yourself to be is not built from truth, but from edited memory fragments, emotional distortions, and subconscious interpretations that have been repeated over decades?
For many of us, we assess who we are today based on examples of who we have been. “I am a nice person because last year I helped my friend move his four-bedroom house and didn’t expect anything in return.” “I am a good friend because when she was going through her divorce a few months ago, I was the only one there for her.” “I’m a good father because I’ve gone to watch all of my son’s baseball games.”
When was the last time you did an altruistic act for someone? When was the last time you invited your divorced friend to coffee? What if your son never wanted to play baseball in the first place?
How often do we look to the past to define us rather than honestly taking time for self-reflection and analysis today? Are we truly who we were in the past? Were we ever truly who we remember ourselves to be? Or are we remembering an artificially constructed, idealized version of ourselves that is quite distorted?
Memory is not stored in our minds like a video file; it is reconstructed every time we recall it. We rebuild each memory, and that current version is shaped by time passed, emotion, and other factors. You can recall the same memory over and over again, but each time you recall it, it will be slightly different. There are natural gaps in the story — these gaps are filled in with assumptions, beliefs, and filtered through your current emotional state.
If you recall a specific memory when you are having a ‘bad day,’ it will look very different than if you were recalling it on a ‘good day.’ Your current emotional state will make bad things worse and good things better. This applies both to the situation and to how you see yourself or the other people involved.
Not only is your current identity influenced by memory — your memories are influenced by your present identity. We are constantly rewriting our past to support who we believe ourselves to be in the present. We will naturally block out or add in elements that support who we believe ourselves to be, or wish that we were today.
The interesting thing is that emotion strengthens certain memories, but also distorts them. Past events that created strong emotions are often the most clear — and the most distorted and inaccurate.
In 1977, Roger Brown and James Kulik coined the term Flashbulb memory. This is a psychological phenomenon that occurs with highly vivid and emotionally charged recollections — usually triggered by intense situations. The memory feels like a clear snapshot of the occurrences. Typically, these memories are accompanied by a high level of confidence in recollection accuracy, yet are often not very factual at all.
These flashbulb memories emerge when intense emotion activates the amygdala, which enhances the encoding of specific details. Because of the intense emotional arousal, the amygdala works together with the hippocampus and strengthens consolidation pathways, making the memory feel like it is ‘frozen in time.’ This is why eyewitness accounts of crimes and other public traumatic events are often very inaccurate — five different witnesses will have five different retellings of the same exact event.
The brain is designed for survival, so it prioritizes meaning, emotional impact, and survival relevance. Some personal triggers may be relationship breakups, childhood abuse, or significant moments of humiliation or great praise. Even though these events are often remembered incorrectly, they will quite often become deeply ingrained identity anchors.
Get Question Everything with Patrick Ryan’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Again, the brain is wired and systemized for survival. It prefers consistency over truth. The 2022 Nobel Prize winner in Economic Sciences, Daniel Kahneman, conducted some fascinating studies showing the human tendency to create mental shortcuts more than relying on rational processing.
His paper, Prospect Theory, released in 1979, clearly showed that human beings naturally evaluate potential gains and losses relative to a specific reference point. The mental and emotional weight of losses is much greater than gains. Instinctively, a person is more likely to react irrationally to avoid potential losses than they will to pursue potential gains.
Later in his life, Kahneman identified the “two selves” — the experiencing self and the remembering self. He observed that feelings of overall life satisfaction are largely influenced by the remembered narrative more so than the cumulative lived experience. A handful of emotionally impactful memories can shape a person’s overall view of their life more than the total. If a person lived mostly a ‘good life,’ they may feel their life was not good because of a few specific bad memories that carried a strong emotional charge.
Kahneman also identified two systems of thinking — the dual-process theory. System one is fast and intuitive processing. System two is slow and analytical processing. His studies found that intuition can be very efficient, but also very prone to error. He emphasized the importance of understanding these two systems. When we better understand them, we can better learn when to operate from fast, intuitive living and when it is best to slow down and analyze the situation.
To reduce cognitive dissonance and maintain a stable identity, the brain creates a ‘story of self’ rather than an accurate depiction. Essentially, who you believe yourself to be is not who you actually are — you become the main character in your own emotionally layered narrative. Contradictory memories will be minimized, reinterpreted, or forgotten to fit the narrative of who you think you are or want to be.
The subconscious mind is formed and solidified through repetition, and memories play a significant role in these neural formations. Beliefs are shaped by repetition. The more a memory is recalled with certain emotional connotations, the more it feels real. Regardless of accuracy, the memory begins to feel more stable as truth.
A process known as memory reconsolidation is a neurobiological process in which memories temporarily become unstable and pliable when reactivated so that they may be ‘rewritten’ before being stored again. This process allows us to update, strengthen, or weaken certain aspects of the story before filing the memory away again. This system is often used in certain therapeutic modalities to reframe troubling memories, making them less intense and emotionally triggering. This idea bridges neuroscience and psychology.
Oftentimes, the repeated story you tell yourself about who you’ve “always been” is not an accurate account — they are often nothing more than repeated, reinforced interpretations causing you to become anchored in a certain identity. The key is to practice eliminating the language of “I’ve always been” and replacing it with “Today I am choosing to be.”
Just as repeated self-talk reinforces false identity narratives, the same goes for social influence. If your family or longtime friends are often saying “You’ve always been,” then you will internalize and personalize their interpretations of you as truth. Any repeated narrative, whether self-induced or externally communicated, will solidify itself into your neural circuitry as truth. “You’ve always been” or “I’ve always been” becomes “I am, and always will be.”
Most of us live our entire lives being inundated with corrupted social data that creates a plethora of false memories. We do not consciously choose our identity; we are subconsciously constructed through external suggestion and repetition. From the time you first entered this life, the world has told you who you are — and you believed it. Your parents, siblings, friends, neighbors, teachers, TV personalities, online trolls and influencers, and on and on it goes have been telling you who you should be. When was the last time you took the time to stop everything, turn off the noise, get silent, and ask yourself, “Who am I really?”
Memory is selective. It does not remember everything — it remembers what most fits your programmed identity narrative. Your brain will naturally filter experiences through meaning, relevance, and identity alignment. It is also inherently programmed toward confirmation bias to reinforce what you already believe about yourself. You will selectively remember in a way that confirms your beliefs about yourself and the world you experience. As time goes on, you continue to collect evidence supporting your deepest held beliefs while ignoring anything that contradicts them.
If you are not careful and do not learn how to experience life and yourself consciously, you become a distorted version of yourself. False memories ultimately contribute greatly toward creating a false self. Based on years of corrupted input and distorted recollection, you will limit yourself, misjudge your capabilities, and carry emotional weight that is rooted in falsehoods. Inaccurate interpretations of the past will restrict your current potential in the present reality.
For many, we are not living today as we actually are — we are maintaining the story of who we remember ourselves to be. We must practice reflecting on and questioning our memories. It is crucial that you do not assume your memories are true, no matter how vivid and real they may seem.
We must also learn to separate the event from the meaning we have attached to it. For example, I remember as a child my dad burned my arm with a hot iron. I can remember that event as him being an abusive father, or I can properly assess the circumstances and understand it was an accident. We have all had traumatic experiences; not all of them deserve victimized meanings.
You are not bound to your past self as you remember yourself to be or who those closest to you have told you you were. Memory is fluid, and identity is not fixed. If we look at this purely from studies within neuroscience, we clearly see that self-identity is far more flexible than you have been led to believe.
Do not assume who you are today has to be the same as who you were yesterday — and know that today, you may choose who you will be tomorrow.
