Stronger United
Ever since I started thinking about this project, mentioned in here, I’ve been thinking about a variety of ways 1 organization could “rule” the world. There were many questions that came up, but the one that stuck out the most was “how should we do it”.
Plans to get there was not the biggest issue, it was more along the lines of what do we do with such power. Do we need such power?
Kind of. Our trajectory is somewhat off course thanks to unregulated capitalism, and the rise of a new superpower threatens the limited ‘free will’ and ‘freedom’ we currently have, especially to neighboring countries, and countries that have indulged in their ‘investments’.
There’s another one that seems to be in a state of perpetual hibernation, and we’re not entirely sure what to believe, and we have part of a continent that is dealing with an infestation of sorts, that they welcomed with open arms, with little to no conditions. We also have an entire continent that still practices traditional slavery and some of them are under militia rule. But the one common thing we all have that needs to be abolished is financial and moral corruption.
Though assuming that we the people finally take control of power, we would still need governing bodies, still need to elect representatives, and even if we create ‘clean economies’, corruption would still be an issue. But consolidating power into only one governing body might help reduce it. Which would also mean one point of weakness.
I used to like the Darwinian theory. The theory that states humans evolved from monkeys over a period of 6–7 million years? That could be proven true in the future but I was more interested in the natural selection process. That a superior species would dominate and ‘evolve’ over the years and adopt new features and even colours.
It is wonderful to see the varieties of animals we have on Earth. We have cats that will kill us, and we have cats that we would kill for. My Kathy (cat) doesn’t like eating from a bowl, so we usually leave her food on the ground on the porch. And being the little lady she is, she will always leave some for the squirrels and frogs. But sometimes, there would be ants that come and envelop the area.
What used to be larger black ants are now these barely noticeable ants that would come for her leftovers. I love ants, but despised these guys because Kathy wouldn’t eat if they were around, and I usually bore the brunt of lectures from the parents, for letting her food go to waste — even if it wasn’t I who fed her.
So what did I do? To send a message to the colony, I would play god and step on the line of ants leading to the food. The ants would panic and skedaddle. And I suppose I did it far too often because, now some tiny ass ants have entered the picture. I suppose I killed far too many of the big boys, a new tiny-ant colony managed to win some great ant war in my garden.
Thankfully we’ve collectively agreed that playing god through a nuke war is inhumane and we’ll probably never see such destruction ever again, hopefully. But we’ve been going through something called ‘Social Darwinism’ (SD) in the form of gentrification & racism for far too long. Compared to a nuke, I personally thing this is a slower, more painful death — therefore making it more inhumane than a nuke war.
The affects of SD is everywhere. Whether intended or not, human behaviour today, is based of a decision made yesterday. A cause-affect relationship that should be analyzed and deconstructed systematically. The lessons learned from the study should be legally implemented as preventative measures against crimes against humanity.
But Darwinism has opened my eyes, to further my bloodline, I should probably look for a girl that will help offset my defective genes. Perhaps someone from a family without heart issues, arthritis, and a thick head of hair would be nice too. Perhaps out of 20 kids, 1 might be able to die with a perfect quality of life, with a great head of hair.
I don’t subscribe to the superior race card. Different races from different regions have different ways of life. Seeking homogeneity is what brought us to where we are. Homogeneity in a sense of values and societal function perhaps. If we’re looking at where we are as a disadvantage to lets say, colonialism, you’re fairly shortsighted. In the long game, this is but a mere roadblock. Don’t stay in the past, remember it, but life perseveres.
We have to design and pave the road ahead before we can lift the sign off.
There are many races that believe that they are the ‘chosen ones’. But every single one of them are destined for disaster if they continue to believe so. The world of the future is going to be homogenous by race, perhaps even by culture-regionally, and multicultural countries are a simple introduction to that future. They are all riddled with conflicts whether nationally (politically) or locally (financially).
Get Pee Dee is Imperfect’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Your hate for certain races forced you to isolate yourselves and breed hate amongst your people, when you could’ve shared the love and welcomed them through a more peaceful, loving ideology.
There is a simple long term solution but it can’t be implemented currently.
To ensure everyone is treated fairly throughout the world, I think there should be 1 main governing body (legal/financial/resource mgmt/etc.), 195++ national bodies (trade/border/security/audit etc.), and as many cultural bodies (small, community based) required, initially, to get the plan in motion.
Eventually the amount of cultural bodies will decline, local communities would have organized themselves accordingly and a closer interpretation of local, and therefore global homogeneity can be achieved.
The biggest threat to any nation/community is allowing the 0–50% power over the steering wheel. The 84% and above should take lead over national concerns and handle any conflicts democratically. Also monitoring the auditing the global body via the blockchain.
Won’t be able to finish this one tonight. Apologies.
- Talk about how 3 tiers is more than enough, 4 should include accountable parties.
- Talk about how God did not want us to stay idle, through the tower of Babel, but to spread across the lands, but somehow remain united in love.
- Talk about how Christian nations can start by being examples to the rest of the world. How a plug & play democracy can be established anywhere using local laws and customs, ultimately uniting people locally, and eventually globally, allowing for movement without any limitations. How most people will inevitably move back home, and those who remain away will be among like minded people.
- How the limitations of existing systems will eventually be broken. Things such as real estate and ownership of land will cease to exist. Countries will be able to move on from financial constraints like depending on income from land ownership to managing jobs and the movement of people.
- The option to become a nomad, to explore the world while contributing to local economies will be prioritized, exchanging of knowledge and values. True homogeneity.
- Bring it back to Darwinism, propagating and experimenting freely through free natural biological interactions, strengthening the human genome quicker, instead of inbreeding through xenophobic values, resulting in a weaker species.
- While protecting culture & history.
This is part of a series under “Project Kuchiku”, a project designed to help Fix the Future through Platform Building.
Please help this imperfect soul try to perfect this project by contributing $1/month here and share this idea of a better future with potential futurists. Arigato =)
