My fix for YouTube clickbait and padded video lengths
I’m Peter, and I regularly spend a couple of hours watching long-form podcasts. But lately, my attention span isn’t what it used to be. I just want to get straight to the point. The alternative shouldn’t have to be doomscrolling through endless vertical Shorts carved out of those same episodes, where all the context gets stripped away and half the good insights are missing.
What I actually wanted was one cohesive summary packed with all the useful wisdom bits that I can easily save and reference later. It’s even more frustrating when you sit through a lengthy video only to realize it was mostly clickbait padding a single idea (which I get — they need the views, but I don’t need the waste of time). That’s why I made sum.video.
I’m not the only one. In the comments on YouTube videos, people write the same complaints over and over. I started keeping a list, and it grew longer than I expected.
So I built a tool around those exact complaints. It’s called Sum.Video.
The first complaint I saw over and over was about YouTube’s own AI summary. Users call it “one paragraph and basically useless.”
One paragraph can’t tell you where the answer is, or what the steps, numbers, and names are. If you’re watching a lecture or a tutorial, it’s just another thing to ignore.
The second complaint is about time. People write that they don’t want to sit through a 20-minute video looking for two bits of information. Some say they use summaries for 90% of what they watch beyond five minutes.
That’s the real job here: get to the part that matters without paying for it in watch time. For a student with a full lecture week, that difference is hours, every week.
The third complaint is about navigation. The built-in summary has no timestamps, so it can’t jump you to 12:40 where the setup steps are.
In Sum.Video, every point in the summary has a timestamp you can click. The video jumps, and you don’t scrub.
The fourth is about transcripts. Auto-captions are often messy or missing, and the old workaround was to copy the transcript, open a new tab, and paste it into ChatGPT. That’s three apps and a full clipboard of text.
In Sum.Video the full transcript sits next to the player. If captions are missing or junk, we transcribe the audio instead.
The fifth complaint is about trust. Summaries miss steps, names, and numbers, or invent points that were never said.
If the summary misses something, there’s a chat tied to the video. Ask for the steps, the numbers, or the two bits you actually needed, and it answers from that video, not from general knowledge.
The sixth is language. A lot of the good content on YouTube is in English, but not everyone watches in English. People ask for summaries in their own language.
Sum.Video summarizes and translates in 17 languages. So an English video can come back summarized in your language.
The seventh complaint is the nastiest one: the paywall. Read the reviews for popular summarizer extensions and you see the same stories.
Get Peter Nagy’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
“Overpriced subscription after summarising just one video.” “Impossible to unsubscribe… they billed me again.” “Only 7 queries per week.”
Users hate being locked out after one taste. Sum.Video has a real free baseline of 3 summaries a week, not one video and then a wall. Pro is $4.99 a month or $39.90 a year, with a 7-day unlimited trial and cancel-anytime.
Then there’s the reliability complaint. Extensions break when YouTube changes its layout, and the summarize button just disappears. Users write “was working, then the update broke it.”
YouTube’s redesigns are beyond anyone’s control, but we ship updates when the layout changes. And if the button is gone, the app and the website still work.
That brings me to what Sum.Video actually is, because it’s not one product. It’s three.
First is the web app at https://sum.video. Paste any YouTube link and you get the key insights, the timestamps, the full transcript, and the chat. No extension to install, no tab juggling.
This is the part that works for people who don’t want to install anything.
Second is the Chrome extension, and this is where it shines: you never leave YouTube. The summary opens in a sidebar on the watch page, right next to the player. Click Summarize, and you get key insights you can jump to, the transcript, and the chat.
No copy-paste into ChatGPT, no extra tab, no logging into a different AI site just to get a summary. You sign in to Sum.Video, not to another AI tool.
Third is the mobile app. Paste a link from a chat or an email, and you get the same insights, timestamps, and transcript. Same account, same summaries everywhere.
The Android app is live on the Play Store. The iOS app is built and in Apple’s hands, waiting on App Store review right now.
The point of having all three is that the summary should follow the video, not the other way around. At your desk, use the extension; on your phone, use the app; if you want a quick look, use the website.
Who is this for? Honestly, anyone who watches videos longer than about five minutes and doesn’t need to watch all of it. Students with a two-hour lecture, researchers who need numbers from an interview, people deciding whether a tutorial is worth the hour.
It’s also a tool for deciding what to watch in the first place. Clickbait titles are a real complaint. A title promises one thing, and the video covers another.
Reading the key points for thirty seconds tells you what the video actually covers. So you can skip the hour if it isn’t it.
Here’s what I’m not claiming. Summaries don’t replace watching, because some videos have to be watched. The tool’s job is to tell you which parts of which video are worth your time.
I’m not promising the transcript is perfect either. If the audio is bad, the transcript is bad. The job of getting you to the right second of a video faster is one it does well.
I built sum.video because those complaints show up in the same threads, in the same words, year after year. The one-paragraph recap, the missing timestamps, the messy transcript, the paywall after one video. Each is a real, repeated pain, and Sum.Video is my attempt to fix each of them specifically.
If you’re tired of skipping through long videos, try it. There are 3 free summaries a week at sum.video. If it doesn’t save you time, cancel in one click and go back to scrubbing.
