Beyond VC: Choosing the Funding Path That Fits
For a long time, I assumed venture capital was the default. It took some experience and a few missteps to realize that funding strategy isn’t one-size-fits-all.
At OrbiQ ,I’ve had the chance to work with founders navigating different growth stages. Some needed VC. Others thrived with less conventional routes like revenue-based financing or strategic capital. What stood out from the Growth Funding Playbook is how valuable it is to stay open not just to what’s available, but to what truly aligns with your business model and goals.
A few takeaways I’ve found helpful:
• RBF makes sense when revenue is stable and tied to clear growth levers.
• Venture debt can extend runway post-equity, with less dilution.
• Strategic capital offers market access but also comes with tradeoffs.
• Grants and bootstrapping can buy you time, focus, and control.
The core idea? Don’t lock into a single path too early. Instead, build readiness for multiple options, and decide based on what supports sustainable progress not just short-term growth.
Get Ramon Sharif’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
One line from the playbook that stuck with me:
“Capital is not the goal — it’s a tool.”
If you’re weighing funding options or just exploring what’s next, I’m always up for a conversation. No playbook fits perfectly but sharing notes helps us all make better decisions.
📌 𝗙𝘂𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴
This piece comes from a broader reflection I shared on my site about early-stage validation and product research. You can read the full version and explore related topics here: https://ramonsharif.ca
I hope it’s helpful as you work on your own idea or product journey.
🔗 Follow me on LinkedIn: Ramon Sharif
