The Cost of Compassion
Pakistan Cannot Shoulder Afghanistan’s Burden Forever
For nearly half a century, Pakistan has performed one of the world’s largest and least acknowledged humanitarian missions. Since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, successive Pakistani governments have opened their borders to millions of Afghans fleeing war, occupation and political upheaval. At various points, Pakistan hosted more displaced Afghans than almost any other country on earth. Unlike Europe’s refugee crises, this responsibility was carried largely by a developing country confronting its own fiscal constraints, security challenges and infrastructure deficits.
For decades, Pakistan accepted this burden because geography left little alternative and humanity demanded it. Today, however, that humanitarian commitment has collided with an increasingly unforgiving security reality. The return of the Taliban to Kabul in August 2021 was expected by many observers to reduce instability along Pakistan’s western frontier. Instead, Pakistan has experienced a sharp resurgence of attacks by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an organization responsible for thousands of civilian and military deaths over the past two decades.
Islamabad has repeatedly argued that Afghan territory is being used by the TTP to organize, recruit and launch attacks inside Pakistan. International monitoring reports have likewise documented the continuing presence of terrorist organizations inside Afghanistan despite commitments made under the Doha process.
Whether through incapacity, unwillingness or competing political priorities, the Afghan authorities have not prevented their territory from becoming a sanctuary for groups that threaten neighboring states. No sovereign government can indefinitely tolerate such a situation. Yet Pakistan’s security dilemma extends beyond counterterrorism. South Asia is entering a period in which geopolitical competition increasingly intersects with Afghanistan’s fragile political landscape. Every major regional power seeks influence in Kabul. Diplomatic engagement is legitimate; exploiting Afghanistan’s instability for strategic competition is not.
Pakistan has long viewed any external support, direct or indirect, for anti-Pakistan militant networks as crossing a dangerous red line. Indian officials reject such allegations, arguing that their engagement with Afghanistan is focused on humanitarian assistance, infrastructure and regional connectivity. But from Islamabad’s perspective, the combination of deteriorating security, expanding regional rivalries and Afghanistan’s weak governance creates a combustible strategic environment that deserves far greater international scrutiny.
Get Riaz Laghari’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
This is precisely where Western policy has developed a dangerous blind spot. Since the withdrawal of U.S. forces, Afghanistan has steadily slipped down Washington’s list of strategic priorities. International attention has focused, understandably, on Ukraine, the Middle East and great-power competition with China. Afghanistan has become a humanitarian file rather than a security one.
That distinction is increasingly untenable. When international attention recedes, ungoverned spaces rarely remain empty. Militant organizations adapt faster than states. Regional rivalries fill political vacuums. Refugee populations become vulnerable to criminal exploitation. Border insecurity spills across frontiers that already separate nuclear-armed rivals. Pakistan experiences these consequences daily.
The international conversation often reduces Pakistan’s recent refugee repatriation policies to questions of migration management or human rights. Those concerns deserve serious attention. Refugees should always be treated with dignity, and international humanitarian obligations remain important.
But security concerns cannot simply be dismissed as political rhetoric.
Every state possesses both the sovereign right and the constitutional responsibility to know who resides within its borders, particularly when armed organizations exploit undocumented populations and porous frontiers. The challenge is to reconcile humanitarian obligations with legitimate national security requirements, a balance that Western democracies themselves have struggled to achieve.
The broader lesson extends beyond Pakistan. Afghanistan cannot remain simultaneously isolated diplomatically, abandoned economically and expected to function as an effective counterterrorism partner. Nor can neighboring countries bear unlimited humanitarian and security costs while the international community gradually disengages.
Stability in South Asia depends upon more than managing crises after they erupt. It requires sustained diplomatic engagement with Kabul, stronger regional counterterrorism cooperation, meaningful economic support for refugee-hosting states and a renewed international commitment to ensuring that Afghan territory is never again used to threaten its neighbors.
Pakistan’s experience over the past four decades demonstrates a simple truth. Compassion without international burden-sharing eventually becomes unsustainable. Security without functioning institutions proves illusory, and Afghanistan, once again, risks becoming the epicenter of a regional crisis that the world notices only after it has become impossible to contain.
