Chapter One, Explained: Everything That Goes Into Your Research Introduction
Your lecturer said “write your chapter one: introduction.” Nobody explained what’s actually supposed to be inside it, or why. So here’s the practical, no-jargon version; the one I wish someone gave me before I started mine.
- Background of the Study
Think of this as the “story so far.” Before you tell anyone what problem you’re solving, you have to tell them why the problem exists in the first place.
Simple version: If your project is a movie, the background of the study is the first 5 minutes that explain the world before the main character shows up.
Example: If you’re studying “the effect of social media on student grades,” your background talks about how social media use has grown, how students now spend hours on it daily, and how that’s starting to worry parents and schools. You’re building the case before you say what you’re actually going to investigate.
Now, the variables:
Every research topic has two key ingredients:
- Independent variable: the thing YOU change or that changes on its own, and you’re testing its effect. Think: how much water you give a plant.
- Dependent variable: the thing that reacts because of the independent variable. Think: how tall the plant grows.
Water changes → plant height changes because of the water. Water is independent. Height is dependent — it depends on the water.
In “the effect of social media on student grades”: social media use = independent variable (the cause you’re studying), student grades = dependent variable (the effect you’re measuring).
2. Statement of the Problem
This is where you stop describing the world and start pointing at what’s actually wrong with it.
Simple version: Background of the study says “here’s the situation.” Statement of the problem says “and here’s exactly what’s broken about it that nobody has fixed yet.”
This is also where gaps in literature come in. A “gap” simply means: other researchers have studied related things, but not this exact thing, or not in this exact context. Maybe everyone has studied social media and grades in the US, but nobody has studied it among Nigerian secondary school students. That’s your gap.
Your statement of the problem should point straight at it: “Despite X and Y being studied, Z has not been addressed and that’s what this study does.”
No gap, no reason for your research to exist. This is the single most important paragraph in your entire chapter.
3. Research Objectives
These are your “to-do list” items. What you plan to actually achieve by the end of the study.
Simple version: If someone asks “what are you even doing this research for?”, your objectives are the answer, in list form.
Example:
- To determine the extent of social media use among students.
- To examine the relationship between social media use and academic performance.
- To identify strategies to manage social media use for better academic outcomes.
Keep them specific, actionable and each one should start with a verb (determine, examine, assess, identify).
4. Research Questions
These are your objectives, rewritten as actual questions you intend to answer.
Simple version: Objectives say “I will find out X.” Questions say “What is X?” Same content, different format because your data collection tools (surveys, interviews, annual reports) need to be built around specific questions, not vague goals.
Example: “What is the relationship between social media use and academic performance among students?”
Each objective should have a matching question. If you can’t turn an objective into a clear question, the objective wasn’t specific enough.
5. Research Hypothesis
A hypothesis is your educated guess, stated so it can be proven right or wrong.
Get Eriwayo Samuel Oluwadamilare’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Simple version: It’s you saying, “I think this is what we’ll find, and here’s how we’ll know if I’m right.”
Example: “There is no significant relationship between social media use and academic performance.” (This is a null hypothesis; the “nothing is happening” version, which is what you statistically test. Then the Alternative Hypothesis states what you expect the data to show, based on your research on the topic. This is your answer to your research question.)
Not every study needs a hypothesis. Hypotheses are mainly for quantitative studies where you’re testing a relationship with numbers. If your study is qualitative (interviews, case studies, exploring experiences), you usually stick to research questions only.
6. Differences Between Research Questions & Research Hypothesis
Research Question: A question you’re trying to answer | Open-ended | Used in both qualitative & quantitative studies | Example: “What is the relationship between X and Y?”
Research Hypothesis: A statement you’re trying to test | Must be provable/disprovable | Mostly used in quantitative studies | Example: “There is no significant relationship between X and Y”
Simple version: A question is curious. A hypothesis is confident (even if it turns out to be wrong).
7. Scope of the Study
This is you drawing a fence around your project and saying “I’m only covering what’s inside here.”
Simple version: It’s the “terms and conditions” of your research — what it covers, and just as importantly, what it doesn’t.
Example: “This study focuses on senior secondary school students in Lagos State between 2023 and 2026. It does not cover junior secondary students or students outside Lagos State.”
This protects you when someone asks “but what about primary school kids?”, your scope already answered that: not covered, and here’s why.
8. Significance of the Study
This answers the question nobody wants to ask out loud but everyone is thinking: “So what?”
Simple version: Who benefits from this research existing, and how?
Usually you name a few groups: students, teachers, policymakers, future researchers. For each one, say specifically what they gain not “this study will be beneficial to society” that says nothing, insead say “this study will help school administrators design social media policies that don’t hurt academic performance.”
9. Limitations of the Study
This is you being honest about what could weaken your findings and it’s not a weakness to include this, it’s a strength. It shows you understand your own work critically.
Simple version: “Here’s what might make my results slightly imperfect, and here’s why that’s still okay.”
Common limitations: small sample size, limited time, respondents not answering honestly, restricted geographic coverage, name the real ones. Don’t copy-paste generic limitations that don’t apply to your study examiners can tell.
10. Operational Definition of Terms
Some words mean different things to different people. This section locks down exactly what YOU mean when you use them in THIS study.
Simple version: It’s you saying, “when I say this word in my project, here’s exactly what I mean by it not the dictionary definition, my definition, for this context.”
Example: “Academic performance, in this study, refers to students’ scores in their most recent term examinations, not their overall cumulative GPA.”
This prevents confusion and protects you from someone misinterpreting your terms during your defense.
11. Factors to Consider Before Choosing a Research Topic
Before any of the above exists, you need a topic that can actually survive all ten sections above. A few non-negotiables:
- Data availability: can you actually access the information you need?
- Feasibility: can you realistically finish this with your time, budget, and access?
- A real gap: has this exact angle actually not been studied yet?
- Supervisor fit: does your supervisor have expertise in this area?
- Measurability: can your variables actually be measured or observed?
- Genuine interest: you’ll be living with this topic for months; don’t pick something you’ll resent by week 6.
If a topic fails more than one of these, it’s not ready yet no matter how exciting it sounds.
