The Hidden Stories Behind the World’s Most Famous Brand Names
What Apple, Nike, Amazon, Google, and Pinterest can teach us about choosing a name that lasts
A name is the first decision a brand ever makes, and often the one it lives with longest. Logos get redesigned, taglines get rewritten, even missions evolve, but the name usually stays. That permanence is exactly why it deserves more thought than most founders give it.
Some of the most iconic names in business were not the product of focus groups or naming agencies. They came from a fruit orchard, a misspelled math term, a Greek myth, a river on a map, and a wife watching television. None of these stories are as dramatic as the myths people have built around them, and that is precisely the point. The truth is usually simpler, and often more useful, than the legend.
Here is what actually happened, and what it teaches us about naming something that is meant to last.
Apple: the myth versus the man who liked apples
If you have spent any time online, you have probably come across the theory that Apple is named after the apple Eve bit into in the Garden of Eden, the fruit that supposedly changed the course of human history. It is a beautiful story. It is also not true, and Apple has never claimed it.
Here is what actually happened. Steve Jobs was on a fruitarian diet and had just returned from a visit to an apple orchard in Oregon when he suggested the name to Steve Wozniak. According to Walter Isaacson’s biography, Jobs found the name “fun, spirited and not intimidating.” Wozniak’s own recollection lines up with this. He remembered driving Jobs back from the airport after that trip, when Jobs floated the idea right there in the car.
There was also a practical reason buried in the decision. Jobs said in a 1980 presentation that they gave Apple the name partly because he liked apples, and partly because Apple would appear ahead of his former employer Atari in the phone book. In an era when companies were chasing cold, technical names to sound credible, Apple deliberately went the other way.
The lesson: the best names are not always clever wordplay or hidden symbolism. Sometimes the most powerful move is choosing a name that feels human in a category full of names that don’t.
Nike: when myth actually is the real story
Unlike Apple, Nike is one of the rare cases where the mythology is the literal truth. The company is named directly after Nike, the Greek goddess of victory, daughter of Styx and the Titan Pallas, who in ancient depictions is shown winged and moving at extraordinary speed.
The naming itself happened almost by accident. The company was originally called Blue Ribbon Sports, and the team needed a new name fast before a shoe order shipped. A marketing employee named Jeff Johnson had heard that a good brand name should have two syllables and be memorable, and woke up with the name of the Greek goddess of victory in his head just hours before the paperwork was due. Phil Knight was not immediately sold on it, but the name stuck, and so did the idea behind it.
The lesson: when a name carries an existing cultural meaning, that meaning becomes a shortcut. Nobody has to be taught what victory feels like. The name does the emotional work before the product even ships.
Amazon: naming for scale before there was any scale to speak of
Jeff Bezos almost named his company Cadabra, short for abracadabra. His lawyer talked him out of it after pointing out that it sounded too much like “cadaver” over the phone, which is not the association you want for an online bookstore.
Bezos went back to the dictionary looking for a word that started with the letter A, since websites at the time were often listed alphabetically. He landed on Amazon, naming the company after the Amazon River in part because it begins with the letter A, and in part because he regarded it as the name of the world’s largest river, fitting for what he hoped would become the world’s largest online bookstore. As he later told biographer Brad Stone, the Amazon is not only the largest river in the world, it is many times larger than the next biggest one, and it blows all other rivers away.
The lesson: Amazon was a small bookstore running out of a garage when it picked a name built for a giant. The name was not a description of the company at the time. It was a description of the company’s ambition. Sometimes the name should be sized for where you are going, not where you are standing.
Google: when a typo becomes a trademark
Larry Page and Sergey Brin wanted a name that captured the scale of what they were building, a search engine meant to organize what felt like an infinite amount of information. They landed on “googol,” the mathematical term for the number 1 followed by 100 zeros.
Get Sashwat Roy’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
When Page asked a friend to check whether the domain name was available, the friend misspelled it as Google while registering it. Page liked the new spelling better and kept it. A typo became one of the most valuable trademarks on the planet, and eventually a verb in everyday English.
The lesson: not every great name is the result of a deliberate decision. Some of them are accidents that someone had the instinct to recognize and keep. Naming is not only about generating ideas. It is also about knowing a good one when it shows up uninvited.
Pinterest: a name that explains the product in one word
Pinterest stands apart from the others on this list because there is no myth to debunk. The name is exactly what it sounds like: a combination of “pin,” referring to the act of saving images to a virtual board, and “interest,” reflecting the things users care about enough to save.
The name was first suggested by co-founder Ben Silbermann’s now-wife, while she was watching television. It stuck because it described the product so precisely that no further explanation was needed.
The lesson: clarity can be just as powerful as mystery. While Apple and Amazon ask you to feel something, Pinterest simply tells you what to expect. Both approaches work. The mistake is trying to do both at once and ending up with a name that is neither clear nor evocative.
What branding experts actually say about this
It is worth bringing in some perspective from people who study branding for a living, because the patterns above are not accidents of history. They reflect something branding strategists have been saying for decades.
Marty Neumeier, author of The Brand Gap and one of the most widely cited voices in brand strategy, puts it plainly: “A brand is not what you say it is, it’s what they say it is.” A name is the opening line of that conversation. Apple’s name said “approachable” before the company had shipped a single product. Pinterest’s name said “save what you love” before a user had pinned anything at all. The name sets an expectation, and the brand spends years living up to it or being measured against it.
Jeff Bezos has made a similar point about brand more broadly: “Your brand is what people say about you when you’re not in the room.” Amazon’s name was a bet on what people would eventually say about the company once it became what Bezos believed it could be. The name was written for a future reputation, not a present one.
This is the throughline across every example here. A name is not a label you slap on after the product is built. It is a small, early promise about how the brand wants to be understood, long before anyone has the evidence to judge whether that promise is true.
A few practical takeaways if you are naming something
If you are sitting down to name a company, a product, or even a personal brand, these stories offer a few practical principles worth borrowing.
Say it out loud before you fall in love with it on paper. Apple, Nike, and Google all pass the test of sounding natural in conversation. None of them require explanation the first time someone hears them.
Decide whether you want a name that describes or a name that evokes. Pinterest describes. Nike evokes. Both can work, but trying to cram both into a single name often produces something forgettable. Pick one lane and commit to it.
Do not over-engineer the meaning. Several of the names on this list, Google and Apple especially, came from accidents, casual preferences, or practical constraints rather than elaborate symbolism. A name does not need a five-paragraph backstory to be effective. It needs to be easy to say, easy to remember, and free of negative associations in the markets where you plan to operate.
Check how the name ages. A name picked for a small bookstore or a two-person dorm room project has to be able to carry a company that might one day be worth billions. Amazon worked at every stage specifically because it described an ambition, not a current size.
Be honest about your own origin story. If you ever find yourself reaching for a poetic explanation that is not actually true, drop it. The real story, even when it is as plain as “the founder liked apples,” is usually more credible and more interesting than a manufactured myth, especially once people start fact checking it.
The real takeaway
None of these companies became valuable because of their names alone. Apple did not win because Eden is a compelling metaphor, because that metaphor was never even part of the real story. Apple won because it spent decades obsessively pursuing the same simplicity its name implied. Pinterest won because it built a product that did exactly what its name promised, nothing more and nothing less.
A name is a promise. The company’s job, for as long as it exists, is to spend every year afterward making that promise true.
If you found this useful, you might enjoy thinking through the name behind your own brand or project. What promise is it making, and are you keeping it?
