“Don’t You Get Me Wrong”
What Cynthia Erivo’s Jesus Reveals About Faith, Fear, and Ownership
Section I: The Scandal of the Sacred
All images in this essay were generated by [ChatGPT / DALL·E] via OpenAI, in collaboration with the author. These visuals are original, AI-assisted works created for editorial use. They are not affiliated with or derived from official materials related to Jesus Christ Superstar, Cynthia Erivo, the Hollywood Bowl production, or any referenced individuals or institutions. Usage Note:
These images are intended for non-commercial, commentary-based use under fair use principles. Do not reuse or redistribute without attribution.
When Cynthia Erivo stepped onstage as Jesus at the Hollywood Bowl this August, she carried more than a crown of thorns and a microphone — she carried centuries of entitlement, fear, and unspoken rules about who is allowed to wear the sacred. A Black, queer woman playing Christ? It was unthinkable to some. Offensive to others. “Blasphemous,” they said. “Demonic.” The sort of casting that, according to her loudest critics, mocked not just tradition but God Himself. Social media lit up with condemnation, most of it not theological but anatomical — obsessed with skin, gender, orientation, optics. For instance, an X user declared, ‘Cynthia Erivo, a black woman, as Jesus Christ? Please stop with the lunacy,’ revealing not a scriptural objection but a visceral discomfort with her identity. This wasn’t theological critique. It was boundary panic.
And that panic wasn’t random. It was precise. Because in the American imagination, Jesus has long been a controlled symbol. He is the serene white man in Renaissance paintings. The soft-spoken moral compass of suburban Christianity. The invisible endorsement stamped on national holidays, military rhetoric, and tax-exempt mailers. Jesus, for many, is not a living theological reality — He’s a brand.
So when Erivo took that stage — body, voice, and story defying every expectation of who is “worthy” of the Christ role — she didn’t just challenge a casting choice. She challenged a proprietary instinct. She made visible what had long gone unspoken: that people don’t want to worship Jesus. They want to own Him.
And when that illusion broke, the reaction was instant. Because for many, Jesus must remain familiar — a safe, static mirror of their values, their culture, their self-image. When the sacred is no longer flattering, it becomes threatening.
Cynthia Erivo didn’t desecrate Jesus. She desecrated the idea that Jesus belonged to them.
And that — not her talent, not her theology, not even her identity — is what sparked the fire.
Section II: Who Owns God?
Blasphemy is rarely about God. It’s about control.
When people shout it — online or from pulpits — they’re usually not defending theology. They’re defending territory. “Blasphemy” marks the edge of what we’re willing to call sacred. And what we call sacred often looks a lot like… us.
Every culture remakes its gods in its own image. That’s natural, even inevitable. But the trouble begins when those images stop being symbolic and start being exclusive — when God becomes a likeness to defend, not a mystery to encounter.
That’s not faith. That’s ownership.
Jesus — historically and scripturally — was a Middle Eastern Jew born into poverty, who defied empire, broke religious laws, and disturbed the social order. Yet for much of Western history, He’s been reimagined as pale, passive, and respectable. A divine therapist in sandals. The acceptable face of power.
That image wasn’t chosen for accuracy. It was chosen for reassurance. And over time, it hardened into a boundary: a visual shorthand for who God can be — and who cannot.
So when someone like Cynthia Erivo steps into that role — when the voice of God emerges from a body that breaks those expectations — it triggers something deeper than disagreement.
Not because her portrayal is wrong. But because it threatens to be right.
Because if Christ can look like her, sound like her, radiate through her — then who else have we failed to recognize? What other messages have we ignored because they arrived in unfamiliar flesh?
That’s the real crisis. Not that God has changed, but that we mistook our reflection for Him. And now that the mirror is cracked, we’re scrambling to recover what was never ours.
The sacred does not belong to anyone. It arrives uninvited. It speaks through unlikely mouths. It refuses the likeness we try to trap it in.
And that refusal — that divine indifference to our preferences — is what people are calling blasphemy.
Section III: The Incarnation Was Always Radical
The Incarnation is not a comfort story. It is a cosmic disturbance.
To say that God became flesh is to say that the eternal chose to inhabit the fragile. That the source of all being willingly entered time, vulnerability, political instability — and not as a king or philosopher or mythic warrior, but as a poor child of a colonized people under a brutal empire. The Incarnation was never designed to make us feel safe. It was meant to shock us out of ourselves.
But modern Christianity has grown numb to that shock. We’ve covered it in velvet, filtered it through stained glass, and taught people to treat Jesus like a divine mascot — a gentle symbol of continuity and belonging, rather than the living rupture that He was. The Incarnation, once an unthinkable descent of God into flesh, has been polished into brand identity.
Over time, this story — the most radical in human theology — became domesticated. Jesus was remade as respectable: white, mild, masculine, comforting. A curated icon for a curated culture. The real scandal was edited out.
But the Gospel doesn’t begin in a cathedral. It begins with blood and uncertainty — a teenage girl, an occupied people, a child born among animals. It begins in obscurity, irrelevance, and scandal. It begins in a body no one was prepared to worship.
So when Cynthia Erivo walks onstage as Jesus — Black, queer, female, magnificent — she doesn’t distort the theology. She brings it back to life.
The Incarnation was never about resemblance. It was about presence. A God who shows up in a form that is deliberately unchosen by the powerful — a form that forces us to reckon with how thoroughly we’ve fused divinity with dominance.
Christ does not arrive the way we want Him to. He never has. He dines with the wrong people. He touches the untouchable. He speaks in riddles, breaks purity codes, refuses both revolution and respectability. His followers want Him to be a king; He chooses the cross.
If the Christ you worship always looks familiar — always fits your moral comfort zone — then you may not be worshiping Christ. You may be worshiping an echo.
Cynthia Erivo, standing center stage in a role many claim she’s unworthy of, embodies the oldest theological truth in Christianity: that the Word will become flesh in a form the world refuses to recognize — and that’s exactly how you know it’s real.
Section IV: Cynthia Erivo as Theological Correction
“If you’d come today, you could have reached a whole nation.”
Judas sings this in Jesus Christ Superstar — bitter, cynical, and strangely correct. It’s the ghost of a lament: that Christ came too early, spoke to too few, and died too soon to be understood.
But maybe Judas was also speaking to us. Maybe that line wasn’t just a jab — maybe it was a dare.
Because if Jesus came today — really came, in the flesh, to a stage, a screen, or a street corner — would you recognize Him? Would you listen? Would you follow? Or would you scroll past the livestream, offended by His accent, His pronouns, His hair, His skin, His body?
In an age where the Word is buried under content, when attention is currency and outrage is liturgy, Cynthia Erivo may be exactly the form the Gospel needs: vivid, dissonant, magnetic, undeniable. Not to modernize Christ — but to resurrect the shock of His presence.
Erivo didn’t dilute the message. She restored the tension. She brought back the tremble. She reminded us that incarnation is never generic. It is always specific — always embodied. And that embodiment is always political.
The stage at the Hollywood Bowl was not a stunt. It was a sermon. Her body — Black, queer, female — defied every unspoken rule about who is allowed to carry the sacred. And that defiance is what made it holy. Erivo didn’t just play Jesus. She enacted what Jesus always did: she entered a space she wasn’t welcome in and spoke with authority anyway. Her voice shook stadiums. Her presence shattered boundaries. Her rendition of ‘Gethsemane,’ a raw plea to God, earned a three-minute standing ovation from a crowd of over 17,000, a testament to the holy weight her performance carried. Her performance did what the Gospel has always done when it is alive — it unsettled people. It made the sacred hard to ignore.
This wasn’t performance art. It was theological correction.
It was the Incarnation again — not in flesh made acceptable, but in flesh made scandalous. Not in the body we ask for, but in the body we need to learn how to see.
What makes Cynthia Erivo’s casting so powerful is not that it “represents” the marginalized. It’s that it forces the question every Christian claims to have already answered: What if Christ is here — and we just can’t recognize Him?
Section V: What Are They Really Afraid Of?
No one says they’re afraid of a Black queer woman in a crown of thorns.
They say they’re defending tradition. Or reverence. Or theology.
Get Sean Punska’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
But theology rarely trembles at representation. It welcomes mystery, paradox, incarnation. What trembles is culture — especially when it no longer recognizes the symbols it once controlled.
The truth is, Cynthia Erivo is not being punished for bad doctrine. She’s being offered up as a scapegoat — for the anxiety that comes when power feels exposed. When identity loses its monopoly on the sacred.
We’ve always needed scapegoats. In ancient ritual, they carried collective guilt into the wilderness. In modern culture, we exile people differently. We don’t burn heretics. We trend them. We dissect them in comment threads. We declare them offensive so we don’t have to say we’re afraid.
Afraid of what?
Afraid that the holy has slipped out of our hands. That we no longer get to dictate the terms of reverence. That Jesus might speak with a voice we’ve spent generations ignoring.
Erivo becomes a lightning rod, not because she profanes something sacred, but because she reflects it from outside the familiar frame. She is not violating Jesus. She is exposing the limits of who we thought He was allowed to love — or resemble.
Her presence on that stage doesn’t diminish Christ. It diminishes the illusion that Christ only belongs to some of us.
Section VI: The Hypocrisy of Sacred Gatekeeping
Let’s stop pretending this was about theology.
Jesus has been whitewashed, commodified, trivialized, and rebranded so many times that if reverence were truly the concern, there would be no shortage of outrage to go around.
But there wasn’t outrage when Godspell dressed Jesus like a clown. There wasn’t outrage when teenage boys with wispy mustaches played Him in low-budget community theater productions with styrofoam crosses and karaoke backing tracks. There wasn’t outrage when Hallmark reduced the resurrection to a moral lesson between commercial breaks.
There wasn’t outrage when Mel Gibson turned Christ’s crucifixion into two hours of pornographic violence — a white, blue-eyed Jesus flayed within an inch of divinity. That wasn’t seen as grotesque. That was “faithful.” That was “powerful.” That was “deeply moving.”
But Cynthia Erivo — radiant, queer, Black, female — steps onto a stage and sings, and suddenly it’s blasphemy?
Suddenly it’s an “affront to scripture”? Suddenly it’s an attack on tradition?
No. Stop. That’s not theology talking. That’s tribalism. That’s fear in a cassock.
Erivo did not transgress sacred ground. She revealed how little ground was sacred to begin with.
The outrage isn’t about protecting Jesus. It’s about protecting a version of Jesus that supports a social order — where whiteness is default, masculinity is divinely mandated, and queerness is something to tolerate, not something that could possibly bear the image of God.
Jesus as a white man is never questioned. Jesus as a mirror of empire, stoicism, and purity is passed around like a communion wafer. But the moment Christ shows up in a body that doesn’t reinforce those defaults — the moment that body demands to be seen as sacred — the knives come out.
Cynthia Erivo didn’t violate scripture. She violated ownership. She reminded people that Jesus is not their mascot. And that, for many, is the one heresy that cannot be forgiven.
Because when Jesus looks like them, they can forgive a lot. They can forgive violence, hypocrisy, greed, nationalism, indifference. They can even forgive mockery, so long as it keeps Christ wrapped in the skin of their comfort.
But the moment Jesus looks like someone they’ve been taught to exclude? The moment Christ’s holiness radiates from a body their worldview was built to marginalize?
That’s the scandal. That’s the panic. That’s what makes them shout “blasphemy” and hit share.
Not because the image is false. But because it might be true.
Section VII: A Civic Mirror — What Pluralism Requires of Reverence
In a pluralist society, reverence cannot depend on resemblance.
If the sacred only feels sacred when it looks like you — your race, your gender, your language, your temperament — then what you’re worshiping isn’t God. It’s yourself.
That’s not just a spiritual problem. That’s a political one.
Because what we imagine as holy — what we believe deserves reverence — becomes the blueprint for what we protect. And what we refuse to see as holy becomes easier to discard, criminalize, or kill.
If Christ is only allowed to speak through certain bodies, then only those bodies are granted divine permission to be heard. And the rest? They are left to beg for tolerance, rather than carry the dignity of incarnation.
We see this distortion in our laws, our headlines, our public grief. Some bodies are mourned as sons of God. Others are dissected as statistics. Reverence, weaponized, becomes a sorting algorithm for whose suffering counts and whose doesn’t.
So no, this isn’t just about casting. It’s about civic imagination. About moral reflex. About whether we want a society that protects familiarity or one that can actually honor difference.
True reverence in a pluralist world is not sentimental. It is rigorous. It requires us to practice recognition — even when the divine speaks in a dialect we weren’t raised to hear. Even when the face before us breaks the script.
Cynthia Erivo’s casting wasn’t a threat to Christianity. It was a test of whether Christianity — and the culture around it — still believes its own theology. Whether we mean what we say when we claim God shows no partiality. Whether we can see the image of God in bodies we weren’t trained to find sacred.
A pluralist society doesn’t ask us to erase our convictions. It asks us to decenter them long enough to let others breathe. It asks us not to surrender our reverence — but to deepen it, stretch it, risk it.
Not to worship everything. But to recognize that what we worship defines who we’re willing to love — and who we’re willing to harm.
Section VIII: If Jesus Is Who You Say He Is…
If Jesus is who you say He is —
the redeemer of all, the Word made flesh, the one who sees the heart and not the face —
then why does it shake you when that flesh looks unfamiliar?
Why is it that a Black queer woman in a crown of thorns unravels your faith more than the crucifixion itself? Why is the skin of God more sacred to you than the wounds? Why do you trust the blood, but not the body?
Cynthia Erivo did not claim to be Christ. She did what prophets, artists, disciples, and martyrs have done for centuries — she bore the image, she carried the weight, she stepped into the role that reveals whether we’re following Jesus or merely protecting our projection of Him.
And if that feels like blasphemy to you, then ask yourself: Which Jesus were you expecting?
Because the Jesus of the Gospels doesn’t arrive on time, or in costume. He arrives in interruption. In offense. In scandal. In contradiction. He arrives in forms we weren’t trained to see as holy. He arrives through bodies that break the rules we use to gatekeep the divine.
He dines with the wrong people. He touches the unclean. He praises the outsider. He warns the insider. He walks through walls. He appears first to women. He dies rejected. He comes back unrecognizable. He stands among His own and is mistaken for a stranger.
So why is it, really, that this particular body provokes you?
Is it that Erivo doesn’t look like Jesus?
Or that, deep down, you fear she might?
He is never yours. He is always more.
And if that terrifies you — good.
That’s where the Gospel begins.
