The City That Watched Her Leave
Miss A returns to Udaipur. The city has opinions about this.
She came back on a Thursday. Not because Thursday meant anything. Because the flight was cheaper and she had a meeting in Bangalore on Monday and the window was exactly what it was.
She did not tell many people she was coming. The ones she told told others. By Friday morning her mother had received three phone calls from people Miss A had not seen in four years, each of them very interested in being helpful, each of them very interested in seeing how she had turned out.
That is how Udaipur works. The information travels faster than you do. You arrive second.
I. What The Lake Gives You
She grew up looking at Pichola every day and stopped seeing it entirely at some point, the way you stop hearing the ceiling fan. It is only when you have been somewhere else long enough that the lake comes back to you. She was standing at the ghats at seven in the morning, the light doing what morning light does to water that is completely still, and she felt something she did not have a clean word for.
Not nostalgia. Nostalgia implies a past that was better than the present and she does not believe that.
Closer to recognition. The feeling of being known by a place. The lake had seen her at twelve learning to lie convincingly, at sixteen learning to want things quietly, at twenty-two leaving with two bags and a very specific intention. The lake had not changed. She had changed entirely. And somehow both of these were true at once and neither cancelled the other.
Me: What does it feel like to come back.
Miss A: Smaller. Not bad smaller. The city is physically smaller than I remembered it. Bangalore does that. You get used to a certain scale and everything before it shrinks. But Udaipur is beautiful in a way I forgot.
I forgot how it smells. I forgot the specific sound of the evening call to prayer bouncing off the water. I forgot that at seven in the morning the ghats are full of old men doing things slowly and it is the only time of day where slow feels like the right speed.
Me: What did you forget about yourself here.
Miss A: That I was afraid of things. I remember being afraid of a lot of things in this city. The people who knew my family, the weight of being seen as a specific kind of girl from a specific kind of household.
I forgot I was that person because I spent four years becoming someone who is not particularly afraid. And then I came back and walked past my old school and felt it again. The specific fear of being judged before you have had a chance to be anything. It came back in about eight seconds.
Me: And what did you do with it.
Miss A: Kept walking. The fear came back and I kept walking and it left again. That is what four years actually teaches you. Not the absence of the old feeling. The ability to walk through it.
II. The City’s Curriculum
Every city teaches you something. Not what it means to teach, the deliberate kind with outcomes and objectives. The unconscious kind. The thing you absorb before you have language for what you are absorbing.
Udaipur taught her proportion. This is not a small thing. Most people spend their adult lives unlearning the wrong sense of scale they picked up in childhood, measuring themselves against people who do not deserve to be the measure, running after things that look important from the outside and are hollow the moment you reach them.
Udaipur, by accident, taught her that beauty is normal. That water at sunrise is not an occasion, it is just Tuesday. That the most beautiful things in her field of vision growing up were also just the backdrop, the ordinary fact of the city. Something in that settled her in a way she cannot fully explain and did not understand until she left.
Bangalore taught her scale and speed. London, when she was there, taught her anonymity and its particular freedoms. Singapore, briefly, taught her what efficiency looks like when it is taken to its logical conclusion and why she does not actually want that as a daily life.
But Udaipur taught her that slow mornings are not laziness. That beauty is not a reward. That proportion is a skill and it can be cultivated. She learned this without knowing she was learning it and she did not understand what she had been given until she had been without it for two years and noticed something was off in how she was measuring things.
Me: What did Udaipur get wrong in how it raised you.
Miss A: The narrowness. Not malicious narrowness. The narrowness of a place that has not needed to expand its categories because the categories have worked for a long time. There are very specific templates here for what a girl from a good family does and does not do.
The templates are not cruel. They are just very sure of themselves. The city is sure of its own templates in a way that can make a girl who does not fit them feel like the problem is with her rather than with the fit.
Me: When did you understand the difference.
Miss A: Late. Later than I should have. I was about twenty before I understood that the template was just a template. That the women who fit it were not more naturally correct than I was.
They had just decided to fit it, or decided not to notice that they did not, or had the specific luck of being a person whose actual shape happened to match what was being asked for. I was none of those. It took time to understand that this was not a deficiency.
Me: Do you resent it.
Miss A: No. Resentment would require me to believe the city knew better and chose to limit me anyway. It did not know better. It was just doing what places do. Reproducing itself. I got out and found out that I had a different shape than what was being asked for, and that the different shape was fine, and I brought that information back and I am sitting here at the ghats with it and the city has no idea what to do with me and I find that more funny than painful.
III. What She Carries Back With Her
She went to the house she grew up in. The kitchen smelled exactly the same. She has been unable to identify what specifically creates a kitchen smell, whether it is the particular combination of spices stored in particular containers in particular arrangements, whether it is the wood of the shelves, whether it is something in the walls.
The kitchen smelled the same and she stood in it for a moment not moving and her mother asked if she wanted tea in the tone that means yes you are having tea, and she said yes.
She looked at the photographs on the wall. There is one of her at eight years old at a function she has no memory of attending. The person in the photograph is wearing a specific expression she still makes when she is being asked to perform being happy about something. She recognised the expression immediately and felt a complex thing she will not try to name here.
She walked through the rooms. The house is smaller than she remembers and also the same size it has always been. Both are true.
Me: What is the hardest thing about coming back.
Miss A: The version of me that lives here is still four years old. Not literally. I mean the version of me that exists in the heads of the people here is the version that left. She is twenty years old and slightly uncertain about everything and making choices that feel brave from the inside but probably look chaotic from the outside.
That is who they remember. And then I show up as the current version and there is a gap between who they are expecting and who walks through the door and nobody talks about the gap but it is there in every conversation.
Me: Does anyone see the current version.
Miss A: My mother. Not completely, but more than anyone else. She does not understand every choice I have made but she pays attention. She notices when something has changed.
She asked me yesterday if I was eating properly in a way that meant she had looked at me carefully enough to want to ask. That specific attention, not the words, is what I mean by being seen.
Me: What do you wish you could say to the city.
Get Abhinav Jain’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Miss A: Thank you, and also you were too small for me, and both of these are true and they are not a contradiction. The smallness is not an insult. Every place is too small for certain people who are shaped to need more room. The place gave me what it had. I needed more. I left. I came back and I am grateful and I am also not going to pretend the leaving was not necessary. I can hold both of those without having to choose one.
IV. The Gaze, Again
It started on Friday afternoon.
She was walking near the old city market in a kurta and jeans she has worn a hundred times in Bangalore without thinking about them, and she became aware, in a way she is not aware in Bangalore, of being looked at. Not hostile looking. Not even particularly interested looking. The ambient looking of a place where everyone knows the categories and she does not fit cleanly into them and the eyes are just doing the work of classification.
In Bangalore the eyes look and stop with themselves. The look does not go anywhere. It does not travel to anyone who knew her mother and form a sentence that gets passed along. In Udaipur the look is the beginning of a relay. She knows this because she grew up inside this relay. She knows exactly how it works.
What surprised her was how quickly her body remembered to respond to it. Four years of not responding, four years of wearing what she wanted without the pre-emptive editing, and in about ninety seconds on that market street her body pulled up the old software. The old calculation. The old question, which is not really a question but a reflex, about whether she was taking up too much space in the wrong way.
She noticed the reflex. That is the difference between being twenty and being twenty-four. Not the absence of the old response. The ability to notice it as a thing that is happening rather than a truth that is being delivered.
She kept walking. She wore the same kurta the next day.
Me: What did it feel like when the gaze came back.
Miss A: Like remembering a language. I did not choose to remember it. It was just there. The body knows things you have not consciously thought about in years. Muscle memory for a particular kind of shrinking.
That is what the community gaze teaches before you are old enough to be taught anything. How to make yourself slightly less. How to pre-edit before anyone else has to. I had not run that software in a long time and it came back very fast.
Me: Were you angry.
Miss A: I was interested. Which is, I think, an improvement. I watched myself running the old software and I thought, that is what that is. Not a truth about me. A program. The city installed it when I was twelve and the body kept it. Watching it run and being able to name it is a different thing than living inside it without knowing it is there.
Me: What would you say to the girl who was running it without knowing.
Miss A: That the watching is not actually about you. The watching is the city doing what communities do. The code is not written for any specific person. It is general purpose. It runs on everyone.
Understanding this does not make the weight of it lighter in the moment. But it makes it possible to put it down when you walk away. The watching stays in the street. It does not have to come home with you.
V. What She Is Taking Back
She leaves on Sunday morning. The flight is early.
She will take back, without packing it, the specific quality of the light on Pichola at seven in the morning. She will take the smell of the kitchen. She will take the knowledge that the fear came back and she walked through it and it left again.
She will take the conversation with her mother over tea in which both of them said practical things and understood larger things and neither of them named the larger things because that is how they communicate and it works.
She will take the understanding, sharpened by the visit, that she is genuinely grateful for this city and genuinely unable to live inside the template it prefers. She will not have to choose between these two things. They are both true. She has been trying to make them contradict each other for four years and this visit has clarified that they do not.
She will leave the way she arrived. Second, after the information about her departure has already reached everyone who needs to know she is going.
Me: What has the visit changed.
Miss A: The story I tell about leaving. For a long time the leaving was something I had to defend. To myself as much as to anyone else. I constructed a version of Udaipur that made the leaving obviously necessary, a place that was obviously too small, obviously too narrow, obviously not equipped for someone with my particular shape. That construction was useful for getting out. It is not accurate.
The city is beautiful. The city gave me things I only understand now. The city is also genuinely not where I live and genuinely not where I was going to build the life I am building. All of this is true simultaneously. The visit helped me stop needing it to be a simpler story.
Me: Will you come back again.
Miss A: Yes. More often than I have been. Not because I am resolving something. Because the lake is beautiful and the kitchen smells a particular way and my mother asks if I am eating with an attention that means she is actually looking at me. Those things are worth the flight.
Me: What do you want someone reading this to understand.
Miss A: That you can love a place and outgrow it. That outgrowing is not a verdict on the place. That the city that was too small for you was also the city that made you capable of needing more room. Those two things are the same story and the same city. The gratitude and the leaving come from the same source.
She came back to a city that has been holding a particular version of her for four years, a version that is twenty years old and slightly uncertain and making decisions that look more chaotic from the outside than they feel from the inside. The gap between that version and the person who walked off the flight on Thursday was wide enough that nobody mentioned it directly and everyone felt it.
What she found was not resolution. She was not looking for resolution. She found that the city is beautiful and too small for her and genuinely responsible for making her the kind of person who could build something larger, and that none of these cancel each other.
She has been carrying these as contradictions for four years. They are not contradictions. They are just the full truth of the place.
The gaze came back in ninety seconds on a market street. She named it as a program, not a verdict, and wore the same kurta the next day. That is four years of work compressed into one afternoon. It is not nothing.
She is leaving on Sunday. The city will hold the new version of her now, the one who showed up at the ghats at seven in the morning and felt something she could not name and did not try to. That version will be the one people remember the next time she comes back. The story has room for her now.
The city that raised you is not responsible for the person you are trying to become. It did not fail you by being too small. It succeeded at being exactly what it was. The size problem was never the city’s problem to solve. It was yours. You solved it by leaving. That is the correct order of events and it deserves no apology.
But here is what she understood at the ghat at seven in the morning. The leaving was possible because of the city, not in spite of it. The lake that was background noise for twenty years was teaching her something about proportion and stillness that she did not have language for and did not know she was learning.
The narrowness of the template was giving her something to push against hard enough that she understood her own shape. You need resistance to understand your own edges. The city provided the resistance. She understood the edges. She left.
Go back. Not to return. To understand what you were given before you were old enough to ask for it. The gratitude and the leaving come from the same source. You do not have to choose between them. You never did.
The city that watches you leave is also the city that made the leaving possible. Remember both. The full truth is always more interesting than the clean version.
She knows this now. She learned it from a lake that did not change while everything else did, and from a kitchen that smells exactly the same, and from a mother who asks if you are eating in a tone that means she has looked at you carefully enough to want to know.
That is not a small inheritance. That is the whole foundation.
sirabhinavjain13.substack.com
