The Revolution Against Freedom. Part I.
The Revolution That Ate Its Children
In February 1979, millions of Iranians from every political persuasion marched together to topple a dictatorship. Marxists linked arms with liberal democrats. Islamist guerrillas coordinated with Khomeinist clergy. Secular nationalists joined forces with bazaar merchants. They shared one conviction: anything was better than the Shah’s autocracy.
None of this rehabilitates the Shah’s repression. It clarifies only that the revolution overthrew one autocracy and built another — faster, more total, and more ideologically armored.
Within four years, every non-Khomeinist faction was destroyed, imprisoned, or exiled. Within months, the very act that had defined the revolution — the right to demonstrate — was banned for everyone except regime loyalists. This was visible in real time to anyone paying attention.
The man the revolution installed as its first prime minister was Mehdi Bazargan, a liberal democrat, an engineer, and a devout Muslim who believed Islam and democracy were compatible. He lasted eight months. In a televised address in September 1979, he described his government as “a knife without a blade” — meaning he held formal authority while the real power belonged to Khomeini’s revolutionary courts, the komitehs, and the rapidly growing Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. When the American embassy was seized in November 1979, Bazargan resigned. Nobody tried to stop him. The liberal democratic experiment in Iran was dead before 1980 began.
What replaced it was not, as many assume, some kind of traditional Shia theocracy. This distinction matters enormously and is routinely misunderstood.
Velayat-e faqih was not invented from nothing by Khomeini. The underlying juristic idea existed in Shia thought, but in a much narrower form — tied to limited guardianship over those unable to manage their own affairs: orphans, widows, the mentally incapacitated. Khomeini’s move was to radicalize it: to turn a restricted legal doctrine into a theory of direct clerical sovereignty over the entire state. That was the rupture. That was why so many senior Shia authorities recoiled from it — not because they rejected religion in public life, but because they recognized an extraordinary expansion of power being smuggled in under inherited religious vocabulary.
Grand Ayatollah Abu’l-Qasim Khoei in Najaf — the preeminent Shia authority of his generation — refused to endorse it. Grand Ayatollah Shariatmadari in Iran, a traditionalist who advocated clerical quietism, actively opposed it and was eventually stripped of his status and placed under house arrest. Even Ayatollah Montazeri, Khomeini’s own designated successor, would eventually turn against it — but that reckoning came later, and it cost him everything.
The new constitution embedded this expanded doctrine into law. Article 4 subordinated every other provision — civil, criminal, economic, military, cultural — to “Islamic criteria” as determined by the Guardian Council. In practice, this meant that every freedom listed elsewhere in the document was legally meaningless whenever the Council decided it conflicted with its interpretation of Islam. The freedoms were decoration. Article 4 was the architecture.
And the decoration came down fast.
Get Tzvi Arieli’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The months immediately following the revolution are sometimes called Iran’s “Spring of Freedom.” Dozens of new publications and political organizations appeared almost overnight. By mid-August 1979, several dozen newspapers and magazines opposing Khomeini’s theocratic project were shut down. Khomeini himself said the quiet part out loud: “If we had been truly revolutionary, we would have destroyed the press long before this.” By the early 1980s, only regime-aligned media survived in any legal capacity.
The minorities learned this lesson even faster. Kurdish, Turkmen, and Arab communities had supported the revolution expecting autonomy and recognition. Instead, they were militarily crushed in 1979 and 1980 — before the Iran-Iraq war even started. Khomeini declared jihad against Kurdish separatists in August 1979. The IRGC stormed Turkmen villages in Golestan province in March 1979. Arab autonomy protests in Khuzestan were violently suppressed by May 1979, with over a hundred killed. These were not unfortunate side effects of revolutionary chaos. They were deliberate policy choices made by a regime consolidating absolute power.
The political factions followed. The People’s Mojahedin Organization (MEK) was banned after organizing a major demonstration on June 20, 1981. The IRGC opened fire on the marchers. Mass executions followed. In 1983, the Tudeh Party — Iran’s oldest communist organization — had its leadership arrested, its activities outlawed, and its members subjected to televised forced confessions. By 1983, not a single non-Khomeinist political faction had legal existence inside Iran.
This is not a story of gradual drift. This is a story of systematic destruction carried out at speed by people who knew exactly what they were doing.
The full horror arrived in 1988. As the Iran-Iraq war ground to its end, Khomeini issued a fatwa ordering the execution of political prisoners who refused to renounce their affiliations. The language was explicit: those who persisted in their loyalty to banned organizations were “at war with God” and should be killed. Special commissions — death committees — were established in prisons across the country. Prisoners were brought before panels of three or four officials, asked a series of questions about their beliefs and affiliations, and sent to execution if their answers were unsatisfactory. The process took minutes.
Independent human rights organizations have established a verified minimum of roughly 2,800 to 5,000 prisoners executed in a matter of weeks. The MEK and related opposition campaigns
claim up to 30,000 — a figure that remains contested by independent researchers but reflects the perceived scale of the atrocity among those closest to it. What is not contested is the identity of the people who sat on the Tehran death commission. One of them was a young deputy prosecutor named Ebrahim Raisi. He went on to become president of the Islamic Republic and served until his death in a helicopter crash in 2024.
The one senior figure inside the system who objected was Montazeri — Khomeini’s own designated successor. He called the executions “the greatest crime in the Islamic Republic” and warned Khomeini directly that history would judge him as a “bloodthirsty murderer.” Khomeini’s response was to revoke Montazeri’s status as successor, strip him of authority, and eventually place him under house arrest. Montazeri’s political marginalization was permanent.
Meanwhile, the Iran-Iraq war itself had revealed something equally telling about the regime’s relationship with its own people. The IRGC organized Basij militia units composed of young volunteers — many of them children, some as young as nine. These volunteers were issued plastic “keys to paradise” and sent through minefields ahead of regular troops, or deployed in human-wave attacks against Iraqi positions. The death toll was staggering. The IRGC grew through the war into a massive political, economic, and coercive apparatus answerable solely to the Supreme Leader — not to the elected government, not to the people, not to any constitutional mechanism of accountability.
The revolution of 1979 promised freedom of the press and shut down newspapers within months. It promised freedom of assembly and banned independent demonstrations within two years. It promised a pluralistic political system and eliminated every faction but one within four years. It promised justice and executed thousands of political prisoners in a few weeks. It promised equality for ethnic minorities and crushed them militarily before the first anniversary.
This is not a cautionary tale. It is a blueprint — one whose consequences reach far beyond Iran’s borders.
The world’s failure to read that blueprint is the subject of Part 2.
Source notes: Casualty estimates for the 1988 massacres: Amnesty International (2018 report), Human Rights Watch, Montazeri’s posthumous memoirs. Verified minimum: 2,800–5,000. MEK-affiliated estimate: up to 30,000. Constitutional analysis: Article 4 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran; Guardian Council oversight per Iranica. Velayat-e faqih: Britannica entry; Khomeini’s “Islamic Government” (1970). IRGC institutional development: Afshon Ostovar, “Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards” (2016).
