Juicero: The $400 Juicer That Was a Complete Scam
Here’s a story about a machine that cost $400 and did absolutely nothing you couldn’t do with your own two hands.
Juicero raised $120 million from the most prestigious venture capital firms in Silicon Valley. Google Ventures. Kleiner Perkins. Campbell Soup. It was supposed to revolutionize how we drink juice. It was supposed to be the next Nespresso. It was supposed to change the world.
Instead, it became the most famous punchline in Silicon Valley history. A symbol of everything wrong with tech culture: overfunded, overengineered, and completely unnecessary.
💸 The Pitch: Four Tons of Force to Squeeze a Bag
The founder, Doug Evans, was a health fanatic who compared himself to Steve Jobs . He believed he could do for juice what Jobs did for computers. He hired engineers, food scientists, and industrial designers. He built a machine that used four tons of force to press proprietary fruit and vegetable packs .
“We confidently stand behind our promise to help people on their journey to health,” Evans wrote in a blog post .
The machine was Wi-Fi connected. It scanned QR codes on the juice packs to ensure freshness. It was designed by Yves Béhar, the famous industrial designer behind the Jawbone and the August smart lock . It cost $699** at launch. Later, the price was cut to **$399 .
The packs cost $5 to $8 each. They contained chopped organic fruits and vegetables. The machine pressed them into juice. It was supposed to be the future of fresh juice.
🖐️ The Bloomberg Test: Hands vs. Machine
In April 2017, Bloomberg published an investigation that destroyed the company .
Reporters squeezed the juice packs with their bare hands. They got the same amount of juice. In some cases, they got it faster .
The machine was unnecessary. The packs were just bags of chopped fruit. You could squeeze them yourself. You didn’t need a $400 Wi-Fi-connected device to do it.
Juicero’s response was defiant. The company argued that hand-squeezing produced a “mediocre (and maybe very messy) experience” . It claimed the machine delivered “optimal pressure” for each pack. It insisted the system — press, packs, and app working together — was what enabled a great experience.
Get TheBigCollapse’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
But the damage was done. The internet erupted in laughter. Juicero became a meme. It was the perfect symbol of Silicon Valley excess: a solution to a problem that didn’t exist, sold to people who didn’t need it.
💀 The Shutdown: 16 Months and $120 Million Later
Juicero launched in March 2016. It shut down in September 2017 .
Sixteen months. That’s how long the company lasted. It burned through $120 million** in funding. It was losing **$4 million a month . It couldn’t find new investors. It couldn’t find a buyer.
“The company said it was unable to do this on its own and decided to shut down,” The Guardian reported . Juicero announced it was suspending sales immediately and offering refunds for 90 days.
The founder, Doug Evans, had already stepped down as CEO in October 2016 . He was replaced by Jeff Dunn, a natural food executive. Dunn tried to save the company. He cut the price. He laid off a quarter of the staff. He promised a second-generation machine that would cost $200 .
It was too late. The Bloomberg video had destroyed the brand. No one was going to pay $400 for a machine that did what their hands could do for free.
🧠 What Juicero Taught Us
1. Overengineering is a death sentence. Juicero didn’t fail because the technology was bad. It failed because the technology was unnecessary. The machine was a marvel of engineering — four tons of force, Wi-Fi connectivity, QR code scanning. But none of it solved a real problem. A pair of hands worked just fine .
2. Investors can be blinded by the narrative. Juicero raised $120 million from some of the smartest investors in the world. They saw a subscription model. They saw a premium device. They saw the next Nespresso. They didn’t ask the obvious question: does anyone actually need this?
3. The “solution in search of a problem” is a real thing. Juicero didn’t exist because people were struggling to squeeze juice. It existed because a founder convinced investors that there was a market for a $400 machine that squeezed juice for them. There wasn’t.
4. A viral moment can kill a company. The Bloomberg video was devastating because it was simple. You didn’t need to understand the technology or the business model. You just needed to see a reporter squeeze a bag with his hands and get the same result. The image was so powerful that it became the company’s obituary.
5. Silicon Valley has a bullshit problem. Juicero became a symbol of everything wrong with startup culture: too much money, too little substance, and a willingness to solve problems that don’t exist for people who don’t need them .
🏛️ Epilogue: The Juice That Wasn’t Worth Squeezing
Juicero is gone. The machines are collectors’ items now. The juice packs are gone. The $120 million is gone.
Doug Evans went to Burning Man . He didn’t comment on the shutdown. He had compared himself to Steve Jobs. He had promised to change the world.
Instead, he built a $400 machine that squeezed bags of fruit. And then the world found out you could do it with your hands.
The lesson is simple. Innovation is not about adding technology to a task. It’s about making a task better. Juicero didn’t make juicing better. It made it more expensive. And more ridiculous.
The $400 juicer that was a complete scam is now a cautionary tale. The next time someone pitches you a Wi-Fi-connected device that solves a problem you didn’t know you had, remember Juicero. Remember the four tons of force. Remember the $120 million.
And then squeeze the bag with your hands.
For more stories like this, follow The Big Collapse and discover the rise and fall of the world’s most iconic companies.
