Member-only story
Think Twice Before Taking AI To Court
The Cautionary Tale of Mike Lindell’s Legal AI Debacle
Standing before a judge and being asked, under penalty of perjury, to explain why nearly 30 citations in your legal filing are either incorrect, misquoted, or entirely fictional. Not because of laziness. Not because you were rushing to meet a deadline. But because you trusted an AI tool to write part of your legal brief — and it failed you.
That’s the real-life situation now confronting attorneys representing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell in a high-profile defamation case. The incident has thrown a spotlight on the growing tension between emerging AI tools and the bedrock principles of legal ethics and professional conduct. At a time when lawyers, marketers, students, and creators alike are rapidly adopting generative AI to boost productivity, this case raises a hard but necessary question:
What happens when the promise of AI runs headfirst into the courtroom’s demand for precision, credibility, and accountability?
