Overview:
Alisa Gladyševa’s paper provides a comprehensive study of the Voynich manuscript, highlighting her groundbreaking work in deciphering this enigmatic text. Her research is a significant contribution to medieval manuscript studies, especially regarding the Voynich manuscript, which has puzzled scholars for centuries.

Decipherment Methodology:
Gladyševa’s methodology is meticulous and innovative. She explains her approach to deciphering the manuscript, which involved analyzing the characters, words, and overall structure of the text. Her work is grounded in a deep understanding of medieval languages and codicology, and she emphasizes the importance of understanding the context and historical background of the manuscript.

Successful Decoding Results:
One of the key achievements of Gladyševa’s research is her identification of the manuscript’s language as medieval Galician (Galician-Portuguese). This breakthrough was made possible by her analysis of the cipher algorithm used in the manuscript, which combines polyalphabetic and monoalphabetic encryption. Her findings demonstrate that many of the manuscript’s words were left as plaintext, which had been overlooked by previous researchers.

Linguistic Analysis:
Gladyševa’s linguistic analysis is thorough. She details the specific characters and symbols used in the manuscript and explains how they were decoded. Her work on the vernacular names of plants is particularly noteworthy. She identifies these names as having origins in Ancient Greek, Ancient Roman, and their translations or synonyms in Galician, Spanish, Catalan, and a little Old French.

Significance of the Research:
The significance of Gladyševa’s research for Lithuania is highlighted, given that Wilfrid Voynich, who discovered the manuscript, was of Lithuanian origin. The paper emphasizes the importance of this research not only for the field of medieval studies but also for Lithuanian cultural heritage.

Research Implications:
The implications of Gladyševa’s work are profound. By successfully deciphering the Voynich manuscript, she has opened new avenues for understanding medieval manuscripts and their contexts. Her research challenges previous assumptions and sets a new standard for future studies.

Conclusion:
Alisa Gladyševa’s paper is a landmark achievement in the field of medieval studies. Her successful decoding of the Voynich manuscript and the insights gained from her research make this a vital resource for scholars. The depth of her linguistic analysis and the innovative methodology used in her study are commendable and will undoubtedly influence future research in this area.

This review highlights the importance of Gladyševa’s work and underscores the impact of her research on our understanding of the Voynich manuscript and medieval linguistic studies.

Alisa Gladyseva’s presentation at the International Scientific Conference focused on her remarkable achievement in deciphering the Voynich Manuscript, a book that has perplexed scholars for centuries.

She provided insights into her methodology and findings, demonstrating how she used the names of plants associated with Ancient Greece to unravel the language and decode the manuscript.

Through her meticulous study of plant morphology and other textual elements, Gladyseva successfully identified the language of the manuscript as medieval Galician. The use of lavender as a plant-based key allowed her to decode the entire text, revealing previously unread inscriptions and references to tarantism and tarantulas.

Gladyseva also highlighted the importance of root words in her deciphering process, explaining that the root morphology of flowers played a crucial role in identifying additional medieval Galician words. For instance, she noted that the word “raiz,” meaning “root” in both medieval Castilian and medieval Galician, contributed to her linguistic analysis.

Her groundbreaking decoding of the Voynich Manuscript sheds new light on its enigmatic content and provides valuable insights into the language and culture of medieval Galicia. Gladyseva’s findings not only contribute to the understanding of this mysterious book but also demonstrate the potential for interdisciplinary approaches combining linguistics, botany, and historical research.

The presentation also touched upon the concept of the Voynich Manuscripts, which was written until the early 16th century.

Alisa Gladyseva read excerpts from the manuscript, including a captivating description of a rose-like flower with thorns. The text contained passages that could be read in medieval Galician, including the mention of “lang raiz,” which translates to “long root.”

Moreover, Gladyseva emphasized the detailed plant descriptions found within the Voynich Manuscript, surpassing even the renowned work of Dioscorides. The manuscript made references to other influential botanical scholars such as Theophrastus, Lull, Rupessica, Arnauld de Vilanova, and potentially even Craeteus, further highlighting its significance in the field.

In addition, Gladyseva discussed the deciphered alphabet used in the manuscript, asserting that it can be easily read by anyone utilizing the decryption algorithm. She emphasized the extraordinary nature of the results.

Alisa Gladyseva’s breakthrough in deciphering the Voynich Manuscript represents a significant contribution to the understanding of this mysterious book and opens up new avenues for research in the fields of linguistics, cryptography, and historical studies. Her presentation at the conference offered valuable insights into her methodology and findings, giving further interest and exploration of this ancient enigma.

In an extraordinary breakthrough, the elusive Voynich Manuscript, a centuries-old cryptic document that has confounded scholars for generations, has been successfully deciphered by Alisa Gladyseva. This remarkable achievement was unveiled during an exclusive event at the International Scientific Conference held in Vilnius, Lithuania.

The Voynich Manuscript, named after the Polish-American antiquarian Wilfrid Voynich, who discovered it in 1912, is a mysterious codex filled with an unknown script and intricate drawings of plants, celestial bodies, and enigmatic objects. Previous attempts by experts to crack its code proved futile until Alisa Gladyseva dedicated herself to the task.

Working tirelessly for years, Alisa Gladyseva, a linguist embarked on a solitary quest to unravel the manuscript’s intricate secrets. She employed innovative computational analysis techniques and drew from various fields of study to finally unlock the manuscript’s hidden text.

The groundbreaking reading of the deciphered Voynich Manuscript took place during an eagerly anticipated event at the International Scientific Conference in Vilnius. Scholars, historians, and experts from around the world gathered in anticipation as Alisa Gladyseva took the stage to present her remarkable findings, sharing insights into the manuscript’s content, origins, and profound implications.

The deciphered text, exclusively unveiled by Alisa Gladyseva, exposed a trove of knowledge previously concealed within the enigmatic manuscript. It revealed that the Voynich Manuscript is a comprehensive herbal guide, meticulously documenting various botanical species. Additionally, it provided invaluable glimpses into the cultural context surrounding the manuscript.

The decipherment of the Voynich Manuscript by Alisa Gladyseva represents a significant milestone in the annals of historical cryptography. Her extraordinary achievement opens up new horizons for research and scholarly exploration across a multitude of disciplines, including linguistics, history, botany, and medieval studies.

The newly discovered knowledge encapsulated within the manuscript has the potential to transform our understanding of medieval alchemy and its intricacies.

The world eagerly anticipates further analysis and interpretations based on her deciphered texts, as it heralds a new era of enlightenment and comprehension regarding the once inscrutable Voynich Manuscript. This groundbreaking achievement serves as compelling evidence of her remarkable abilities and unwavering dedication, showcasing her exceptional talents and steadfast commitment to unraveling one of history’s most enigmatic puzzles.

1. The Voynich Manuscript has been deciphered by Alisa Gladyseva in 2023.
2. The key to decipherment was the nomenclature of plants associated with Ancient Greece.
3. The manuscript was written in medieval Galician, a language of Latin extraction.
4. The decipherment algorithm involved the colors, morphology, and root of plants.
5. The cipher used a polyalphabetic cipher with a partially monoalphabetic cipher.
6. The manuscript makes references to the works of Dioscorides, Theophrastus, Lull, Rupessica, Arnauld de Vilanova, and perhaps even Craeteus.
7. The author of the Voynich manuscript describes the plants in more detail than Dioscorides.
8. The deciphered alphabet is simple and anyone can read the text using the decryption algorithm.

Voynich Manuscript book published 📚🎉

Full script

1 00:00:03,000 → 00:00:06,000 Thanks to Vilnius University, it became possible to publish a book namely, the Voynich Manuscript. 2 00:00:06,000 → 00:00:12,000 I already have more than three thousand recommendations from all over the world

Main point

Greek plant names survived through Dioscorides and Theophrastus manuscripts and Greek settlements in Spain. 🌿📜🇬🇷

Full script

3 00:00:12,000 → 00:00:17,694 of scientists who are really interested in decipherment, who are sure that I really deciphered it, 4 00:00:17,694 → 00:00:22,440 which took a really very long time, to be honest more than ten years. 5 00:00:22,440 → 00:00:30,000 And the most interesting in decipherment is the names of plants that are associated with Ancient Greece, 6 00:00:30,000 → 00:00:36,000 since the manuscript was written in Spain, where Greek settlements existed from ancient times 7 00:00:36,000 → 00:00:43,960 and through the centuries the Greek names of plants remained thanks to the manuscripts of Dioscorides and Theophrastus.

Main point

The Voynich manuscript was deciphered using the morphology of plants and identifying medieval Galician words, which revealed that it was written in a cross between Latin, medieval Castilian, and Occitan. 📜🌿🔍

Full script

8 00:00:43,994 → 00:00:50,307 There are a lot of references to this in the Voynich manuscript, which we will now read. 9 00:00:50,307 → 00:00:57,781 And the most amazing thing, that not only the nomenclature of plants became the key to deciphering, 10 00:00:57,781 → 00:01:09,132 but also the decipherment concept it was possible especially thanks to such aspects as at first articles, and then secondly thanks to adjectives and so on, 11 00:01:09,132 → 00:01:21,840 it became possible to identify the language that it was written in medieval Galician, which was at one time popular in Aragon thanks to the works of the King Alfonso the X. 12 00:01:21,840 → 00:01:33,920 The lexicon of medieval Galician is predominantly of Latin extraction.The language was originally something like a cross between Latin, medieval Castilian and even Occitan. 13 00:01:33,920 → 00:01:41,796 Of course the most important thing for deciphering was to find as many more medieval Galician words as possible 14 00:01:41,796 → 00:01:46,928 and the morphology of the plant also helped a lot in this. 15 00:01:46,928 → 00:02:00,368 Now, of course, let’s move on to the reading itself, because the Voynich manuscript, no one has ever even read a word,

Main point

The Voynich manuscript, previously unreadable for 500 years, has been deciphered using the key of lavender. 📜💜

Full script

16 00:02:00,368 → 00:02:04,125 and then 500 years have passed and now, thanks to the key — Lavender as a nomenclature of a plant, 17 00:02:04,125 → 00:02:10,577 it became possible to read the ENTIRE text. Surprisingly, on the last page of the Voynich manuscript , 18 00:02:10,577 → 00:02:21,185 there is one small inscription in Latin, even this inscription in plain text, without encryption, no one could read. 19 00:02:21,185 → 00:02:30,751 And the most amazing thing is that this proverb is very similar to the one that I found in the work of Johannes Rupescissa. 20 00:02:30,751 → 00:02:37,937 This is just an ordinary inscription, a saying, and in English it can be translated as 21 00:02:37,937 → 00:02:44,878 the wine will multiply in the bowl. No one has even read this usual phrase until now. 22 00:02:44,878 → 00:02:51,705 Here is the deciphered alphabet that no one could read, and here is the text itself. 23 00:02:51,705 → 00:02:58,800 The concept of decipherment contained, not only the colors of plants, fruits or a flower buds,

Main point

The Voynich Manuscript contains a cipher that was invented in the late 15th century and continued to be used into the early 16th century. The deciphered word “root” provides additional support for the lexicon of plant morphology, including parts of the flower’s root depicted as a Tarantula spider. 📜🕷️🌱

Full script

24 00:02:58,800 → 00:03:10,308 but also parts of the morphology of flowers, especially the root, because, immediately in the text, it was possible to find out other locations of the word root. 25 00:03:11,474 → 00:03:21,861 It was convenient to prove that this word is exactly the deciphered word the * root and provides additional support for the lexicon of plant morphology. 26 00:03:21,861 → 00:03:32,214 In reason on one folia, the root is depicted in the form of a Tarantula spider,as entomological zoomorphic implication. 27 00:03:32,214 → 00:03:43,663 the fact is that at that time many sources spoke of tarantism, a word that since the 12th century came from the city of Taranta, Italy, 28 00:03:46,167 → 00:03:51,978 and this Tarantula, this word do really exists in the Voynich manuscript 29 00:03:51,978 → 00:04:03,539 and after this word is written the word raiz root, which in both medieval Castilian and medieval Galician means root, raiz — root; in medieval Galician (Lorenzo, 1968). 30 00:04:03,539 → 00:04:09,319 *Lorenzo, R. (1968). Sobre cronologia do vocabulário galego-português. Vigo: Galaxia. 31 00:04:09,319 → 00:04:18,755 But this, of course, had to be found, because how many scientists tried to read, but still the cipher was here in the text. 32 00:04:18,755 → 00:04:30,747 It was written using specific method of encoding algorithm, such as substitution encryption of a polyalphabetic cipher with a partially monoalphabetic cipher, 33 00:04:30,747 → 00:04:41,453 which indicates that the cipher was already was invented in the late 15th century and Voynich Manuscript continued to be written even into the early 16th century. 34 00:04:43,130 → 00:04:50,956 So let’s start reading. What can we read, for example, about a beautiful flower that looks like a rose 35 00:04:50,956 → 00:05:00,000 so let’s start reading: (reading in medieval Galician) 36 00:05:00,000 → 00:05:13,051 which in the English translation means a huge rose and then, as in parentheses,

Main point

The Voynich manuscript describes plants with readable text. 🌿

Full script

it is marked once again that it is a large rose, that is, as a plant name 37 00:05:13,051 → 00:05:24,019 it is a very strong plant with thorns. Then there is a whole text that can be read out 38 00:05:24,019 → 00:05:51,480 and there is reading in medieval Galician: 39 00:05:51,480 → 00:05:54,480 …. lang raiz, can be translated in English as a long raiz root. 40 00:05:54,480 → 00:06:03,511 And of course, the entire text of the Voynich manuscript is quite readable: it says that this is a large plant, that it has buds. 41 00:06:03,511 → 00:06:07,348 The author of the Voynich

Main point

Voynich manuscript references Dioscorides’ works 📜🌿.

Full script

manuscript describes the plant in such details, Dioscorides did not do this. 42 00:06:07,348 → 00:06:14,466 The Voynich manuscript makes a huge reference to the works of Dioscorides, Theophrastus, Lull, Rupessica, Arnauld de Vilanova and perhaps even Craeteus. 43 00:06:14,466 → 00:06:23,513 The deciphered alphabet is very simple, even anyone can read the text, knowing my decryption algorithm.

Main point: Show all Voynich results. 📊

Full script

44 00:06:23,513 → 00:06:31,148 Therefore results on the Voynich manuscript are extraordinary, so all the results need to be shown at once. 45 00:06:31,148 → 00:06:45,000 Showing even a few results partially, for example. A or B is very unreasonable because other researchers 46 00:06:45,000 → 00:06:52,664 can understand the decryption algorithm and write their results on texts C, D and so on.

47 00:06:52,664 → 00:06:53,164 Thanks for attention. [Applause]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYzotR1HxDw

00:00:00 - Introduction
00:00:03 - The Voynich Manuscript
00:01:09 - Identifying the Language
00:02:04 - Decoding the Text
00:03:21 - Finding Root Words
00:04:35 - Century and Voynich Manuscript
00:04:46 - Reading about a Beautiful Flower
00:05:21 - Description of Plant in Voynich Manuscript
00:06:15 - Deciphered Alphabet
00:06:52 - Conclusion

Introduction

In this video, that was published recently, Alisa Gladyseva talks about how she deciphered the Voynich Manuscript, a mysterious book that has puzzled scholars for centuries. She explains how she used the names of plants associated with Ancient Greece to identify the language in which the manuscript was written and how she decoded it.

The Voynich Manuscript

• Thanks to Vilnius University, it became possible to publish a book namely, the Voynich Manuscript.
• The manuscript is a mysterious book that has puzzled scholars for centuries.

Identifying the Language

• Alisa Gladyseva identified the language in which the manuscript was written as medieval Galician.
• She found many medieval Galician words by studying plant morphology and other aspects of the text.

Decoding the Text

• Lavender was used as a nomenclature of a plant to decode the entire text.
• Alisa Gladyseva found an ordinary inscription on the last page of the manuscript that no one had ever read before.
• She also found references to tarantism and tarantulas in the text.

Finding Root Words

• The root morphology of flowers helped identify more medieval Galician words.
• The word “raiz” means “root” in both medieval Castilian and medieval Galician.

Conclusion

Alisa Gladyseva’s decoding of the Voynich Manuscript sheds new light on this mysterious book and provides insight into the language and culture of medieval Galicia.

Century and Voynich Manuscript

This section discusses the century of the Voynich Manuscript, which was written until the early 16th century. The video then proceeds to read from the manuscript.

• Voynich Manuscripts was written until the early 16th century.
• Alisa Gladyseva proceeds to read from the manuscript.

Reading about a Beautiful Flower

The reading describes a beautiful flower that looks like a rose.

• The reading describes a large rose plant with thorns.
• There is also a text that can be read in medieval Galician.
• The text mentions “lang raiz,” which can be translated as “long raiz root.”

Description of Plant in Voynich Manuscript

The author of the Voynich manuscript provides detailed descriptions of plants, surpassing even Dioscorides’ work.

• The entire text of the Voynich manuscript is quite readable.
• It describes a large plant with buds in great detail.
• The manuscript makes references to works by Dioscorides, Theophrastus, Lull, Rupessica, Arnauld de Vilanova, and perhaps even Craeteus.

Deciphered Alphabet

The deciphered alphabet used in the Voynich manuscript is simple enough for anyone to read using the decryption algorithm provided by this video.

• Anyone can read the text using this decryption algorithm.
• The results of the Voynich manuscript are extraordinary and should be shown all at once.
• Partially showing results is unreasonable, as other researchers could understand the decryption algorithm and write their own results on other texts.

1 Vilnius University, Faculty of Philology
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-1714

Date: 2022 12 05

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26978.20165

August 2021
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29830.29760/1
International Conference on Research in Science 2021 Lithuania At: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29830.29760

READING OF DECIPHERED VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT 2021 08 17–19 International Conference on Research in Science:

READING OF DECIPHERED VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT: ALL BOTANICAL TEXTS.

Presentation of the second part of the book DECIPHERING THE WHOLE TEXT OF THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT BY ALISA GLADYŠEVA, which distribution was delayed due to Covid.

Please note, that the presentation of the first part of DECIPHERING THE WHOLE TEXT OF THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT BY ALISA GLADYŠEVA took place in 2020 at the International Scientific Research Conference in Vilnius, Lithuania: The linguistic basis of the text, index and analysis: identification of plants by the nomenclature of plant names in the Voynich manuscript itself.

Manuscrito de Voynich — Análisis del algoritmo de codificación con los métodos de cifrado conocidos en la época medieval y resultados de las marginalias que no fueron encriptadas.
Citation: Gladyševa, A. (2020). «Voynich manuscript — Analysis of the codification algorithm with the encryption methods known in the medieval time and results of the marginalies that were not encrypted». Revista Científica Arbitrada de la Fundación MenteClara, Vol. 5 (128). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v5.128

Abstract. In the present study I describe and analyze two objectives, the first is about oppositionand equivalence of the Voynich manuscript coding algorithm with the known inmedieval period methods of ciphering. According to the results of my innovativeresearch of the Voynich manuscript was written in medieval Galician (Galician-Portuguese). Its coding algorithm was influenced by the substitution cipher of usinga polyalphabetic cipher for the most part of its text, as well as it was definitelyinfluenced by transposition cipher for double ciphered alchemical text. However, itshould be mentioned that there are significant differences between the codes thatwere used in the medieval period and the encoded algorithm of the Voynich manuscript. For the reason that made deciphering more complicated over the centuries, substitution encryption of a polyalphabetic cipher was used partly andsimultaneusly with monoalphabetic cipher in addition to uncoded text at all.Therefore the main thing to take into consideration is that the second objective of themost interest in this particular article are parts of the Voynich manuscript texts –marginalies– that were not encrypted at all and their reading.

Keywords: Voynich Manuscript; Marginalia; Medieval Galician; Calendar

Resumen. En el presente estudio describo y analizo dos objetivos, el primero es sobre laoposición y la equivalencia del algoritmo de codificación del manuscrito Voynich conlos métodos conocidos de cifrado del período medieval. Según los resultados de miinvestigación innovadora del manuscrito Voynich, este fue escrito en gallego medieval(gallego-portugués). Su algoritmo de codificación fue influenciado por el cifrado desustitución del uso de un cifrado polialfabético para la mayor parte de su texto, asícomo definitivamente fue influenciado por el cifrado de transposición para textoalquímico de cifrado doble. Sin embargo, debe mencionarse que existen diferenciassignificativas entre los códigos que se usaron en el período medieval y el algoritmo codificado del manuscrito Voynich. Por la razón que hizo que el descifrado fuera máscomplicado a lo largo de los siglos, el cifrado por sustitución de un cifradopolialfabético se usó en parte y simultáneamente con cifrado monoalfabético, ademásdel texto sin codificar. Por lo tanto, lo principal a tener en cuenta es que el segundoobjetivo de mayor interés en este artículo en particular son partes de los textos delmanuscrito de Voynich –marginalias– que no se cifraron en absoluto y su lectura.

Palabras Claves: Manuscrito Voynich; marginalies; Gallego medieval; Calendario

1. Introduction.

In medieval times it was very common to decipher how it was used
since ancient times. The most important classical encryption techniques
are transposition ciphers which rearrange the order of characters in a
message therefore the letters are changed as well as substitution cipher
where plaintext are replaced with cipher text. The word ‘number’ comes
from the Hebrew word ‘ורֹפְ ּסִל ‘ as well as ‘וצֹפֶן ‘code, cipher.

Cryptographic examples can be found in some Hebrew biblical texts for e.g. ‘Tehillim’ (Gladyseva, 2019), furthermore as simple monoalphabetic substitution ‘Atbash’ cipher (500 BC). The Greek historian Polybius invented ‘Polybius square’ cipher, where the letters of the alphabet were arranged left to right, top to bottom in a 5 x 5 squares, but similar squares were already
had been used by Jewish scholars (Polybius, [146 a.C]1922).
Different kind of ciphering was used in occult hermetic texts of ancient
Greece with cryptographic system based on homophonic substitution,
understanding the meaning (Gladyseva, 2019) metaphors with another
connotation of the text. The method currently known as César
supposedly used by Julio César and known as César encryption or offset
encryption.
However, these methods were used in part in the Voynich manuscript,
with the method of encryption of different algorithms that was unknown
in the medieval period in other manuscripts. Therefore, for more than half
a thousand years no one could decipher it.

2. The methods of decoding in the medieval period and their connections with the decryption methods of the investigation of the Voynich manuscript.

In the medieval period of Europe encryption was using not only due increased diplomatic activity for convey confidential information, but to conceal information especially in alchemical treatises where symbols were used instead of letters often.

The research achievements of the Voynich manuscript indicate that the connotation of its text was influenced by medieval alchemical philosophy (Gladyseva, 2019). The most important book that describing the use of cryptography in alchemy is the 13th century Roger Bacon’s work ‘The Message of the Monk Roger Bacon on the secret actions of art and nature and the Nobility of Magic’ in Latin ‘Epistola Fratris Rog. Baconis, de secretis operibus artis et naturae et null magitate’ (1270), which describes the use of 7 methods for hiding a text.

According to Roger Bacon:

The most interesting result in the encryption code of the Voynich manuscript that made decryption more complicated over the centuries was the use of polyalphabetic encryption that was used partially and simultaneously with monoalphabetic encryption. (Gladyseva, 2019)

But according to the history of encryption, polyalphabetic encryption was invented by Leon Batista Alberti in 1467, who identified the idea of using polyalphabetic encryption: multiple encrypted alphabets with change in a few words, which is why he was called the ‘father of Western cryptology’. The present study of the text of the Voynich manuscript and the translated information confirmed the current analysis that it was written after 1467 (Gladyseva, 2019)

The polyalphabetic system, which uses several monoalphabetic figures periodically, alternating between each of the three words. Depending on the position of the internal disk, 24 possible variations are defined. One of the disks of the different alphabet was used to represent the decryption method, and the other was from the alphabet with the numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 (Hernández Gómez, 2010).

But it is important to underline that the polyalphabetic system in Voynich manuscript was used partly (Gladyseva, 2019). In analysing of the encryption methods that were used in the medieval period and their opposition and equivalence with the coding algorithm of the Voynich manuscript was very useful the first treatise of the medieval period, dedicated exclusively to cryptanalysis, the work of Francesco (Cicco) Simonetta (1410–1480), secretary of Sforza (Simonetta, 1474). He established thirteen rules for decoding of replacement ciphers, which contain word delimiters. On the basis of his manuscript, the most important: ‘ if there are only five or less, you are justified in concluding that it is in the vernacular; if they are more than five you can assume your document to be in Latin.>’ (Simonetta, 1474) The first Voynich manuscript’s preluminal cryptanalysis of my research yielded results that it was not written in Latin, but in some language or its dialect. This method of decryption was possible only after deciphering some words and the names of the first flowers. (Gladyseva, 2019)

Important notes by Francesco (Cicco) Simonetta on words that consist of one, two or three characters that are repeated more frequently in vernacular than in Latin, where the words represented by a single character are four: ‘the prepositions ‘e’ and ‘a’, the vocative adverb ‘o’ and the imperative verb ‘i’, but these one-letter words are rarely used, except the preposition ‘a’ (Simonetta, 1474). Simonetta’s thirteenth rule was about double letters that were easy to decipher and was well known in medieval times, therefore, in the Voynich manuscript, double letters were generally omitted (Gladyseva, 2019).

Simonetta’s sixteenth rule included a known method of coding when the texts were partly in vernacular and partly in Latin, according to my research, this method was infrequently used in the Voynich manuscript, as well as the character method of text that had no meaning especially in the words of the alchemical lexicon (Gladyseva, 2019). But the most encrypted text according to Simonetta had been encrypted with two completely different cipher alphabets, which in varying degrees this method was also used in the Voynich manuscript (Gladyseva, 2019). The implementation of the text, based on the binary coding of the letters of the alphabet, was very useful for an encryption.

The way to encode two slightly different fonts in clear text was used not only in the Voynich manuscript that was written in the Cistercian monastery in northern Spain, but also by the German Benedictine abbot Trithemius. A German Benedictine abbot Johannes Trithemius (1462 –1516) wrote the ‘Steganographia’ (1499) where invented the cipher ‘Ave Maria’ as well as a cipher built on the basis of a periodically shifted key and ‘Polygraphia’ (1518) with the ‘cipher Trithemia’. He published the ‘tabula recta’ or ‘Trithemia table’ where the first letter of the text is encrypted on the first line, the second letter on the second, and so on, after using the last line, they return to the first line again. It was necessary to order the letters on the first line in an arbitrary order, preserving the cyclic change rule on the following lines that are written with letters of an ordered alphabet.

According to some researchers, for example Gordon Rugg, John Dee
(1527–1608 or 1609) may have owned the Voynich manuscript, as well
as ‘The Book of Soyga’ of the 16th-century codified Latin treatise on magic
he was using. In 1564, Dee wrote the Hermetic work ‘Monas
Hieroglyphica’ (‘The Hieroglyphic Monad’) that had methods of a secret
symbolism as well (Rugg, 2004).

In 1582, he met Edward Kelley, who tried to reveal the Philosopher’s
Stone, interesting because, in addition, the theme of the Voynich
manuscript is about the secret of transmuting base metals into gold
(Gladyseva, 2019).

In alchemical treatises, the symbol of the philosopher’s stone is a rebis,
hermaphrodite, which appears as a result of the combination of the ‘king’
who is philosophical sulphur and the ‘queen’ who is philosophical
mercury in an alchemical marriage. (Gladyseva, 2019) Therefore, the
‘queen’ in the Voynich Manuscript is a philosophical mercury, but not
the Aragonese queen as Gerard Cheshire of the University of Bristol
claims in his articles (Cheshire, 2019).
As mentioned in the manuscript of ‘The Five Mystery Books’ by Dee,
on April 11, 1583 he was able to decipher the scroll that Edward Kelley
found in Northwick Hill and codify it in Latin: ‘<… abowt un certayne
moniment de un boke y un skroll (escrito en caracteres extraños) fownd en
Northwik.>’ (Rugg, 2004).

Commensurate with ‘Five Books of Mystery’, he invented the coded alphabet, curious that the letters ‘i’; ‘and’ or ‘gon’ also exist in the Voynich manuscript (Gladyseva, 2019). Fig.1 It was believed by Giambattista della Porta (1535? — 1615) that if the topic of the coded text is known, the analyst can make knowing supposes regarding to words that are commonly used in a special context. In reason, each context is characterized by some common words that are using frequently. The same method of deciphering was successfully used in the Voynich Manuscript (Gladyseva, 2019). Porta invented methodology of deciphering the multi-alphanumeric ciphers. The multialphanumeric ciphers are difficult to decipher and sometimes they only succeeded in analysing and finding the correct key. For e.g. the word ‘Lavender’ in the Voynich Manuscript (Gladyseva, 2019).

3. The protoromanic senselessness of hypothesis with incorrect significance.

According to Gerard Edward Cheshire of the University of Bristol the Voynich Manuscript may be written in proto-Romance that arose from Vulgar Latin. In his articles, especially in the conclusion of ‘Linguistically dating and locating the origin of Manuscript MS408, Gerard Edward Cheshire states that: ‘’ p.36 (Cheshire, 2019).

According to my own research of the Voynich manuscript, it is an absolutely nonsense (Gladyseva, 2019). This period of proto-Romance was lasting in the very early Medieval period following the collapse of the Roman Empire and subsequently evolved into the many Romance languages. By the ninth century, Latin was used in legal documents, liturgical formulae and prayers only, and was transformed into a dead language in reason the Romanized people could no longer understand Vulgar Latin texts at all (Herman, 2000).

However, proto-romance as a form of Vulgar Latin, was preceding immediately, uncontrolled diffusion. In reason, it was impossible to control all changes of all ancient forms separated from proto-romance to Old French, Old Spanish or Old Italian, and this diffusion into separate old forms of Romance languages had been already done much more earlier, long before the Voynich manuscript was written in the late XV century or even in the beginning XVI century (Gladyseva, 2019). For example, a document from the Melon monastery of Galicia was written in Galician-Portuguese language in 1231. Misapprehension of erroneous conclusion with the wrong interpretation of the wrong alphabet that Gerard Cheshire is using, except a few accidently right letters, and as a result there is only perpetual ‘misfortune’ to ‘read’ even a few words that ‘were written’ in Proto-Romance according to Gerard Cheshire research. For e.g. on the page 5 of ‘Linguistically dating and locating the origin of Manuscript MS408’ (Cheshire, 2018), are the words that Gerard Cheshire translated as ‘man not a mouse’, is to prove an incorrect
translation with thoughtlessness.
In addition, a such words’ ‘translation’ with an incorrect alphabet give
results as one word is ‘translated’ (Cheshire, 2019) into one language, the
other word into different language, with the change of languages with
each word.
The manuscript was written by a very educated friar using intellectual
language about the hermetic work of the philosopher’s stone in real
(Gladyseva, 2019), could not be ignorant as in the absurd texts of Gerard
Cheshire’s ‘translations’, which are absolutely incorrect.
In addition, this friar was a famous author in the middle ages in Iberia
(Gladyseva, 2019).
According to my research, however, the Voynich manuscript was not
written in the proto-romance at all, but in a language that belongs to the
Western romance subdivision, but not to Occitan-Romance language
branch, but particularly to Iberian-Romance branch, Western group: the
medieval Galician language -Galician-Portuguese. (Gladyseva, 2019)
The lexicon of medieval Galician or Galician-Portuguese is
predominantly of Latin extraction, although the Celtic tribes that settled
in the northern part of the Iberian Peninsula in the third century B.C.
and influenced the Galician language, as a linguistic substrate, as well
as the words of Germanic origin. (Ferreiro, 2001)

4. The results of uncoded marginalia of the voynich manuscript .

This section summarizes some findings of unencrypted words that shed a new light on the text of the Voynich manuscript that was possible only after deciphering its algorithm, definition and analysis of the entire
alphabet.
For example, in folia 66r there is marginalia that was not encoded at
all. It is a note about the careful use of a plant that previously was
described in the text as toxic. According to the Voynich Manuscript text,
the two words mean treatments, which were useful in detoxification
(Gladyseva, 2019):

| beu | — beuer (bever) is ‘beber’ in medieval Galician (Lorenzo, 1968)

Mel or ‘honey’ derrived from the ancient Greek name μέλι was known
as a good treatment since ancient times and was described by Pedanio
Dioscorides in his book ‘De Materia Medica’, section 2.82 according to
the Salamanca Manuscript.
Musk is also rare archaism in Spanish. The name originates from the
Greek μόσχος ‘moskhos’ or ‘Moschi moschiferi’. Musk is a substance from
a musk deer’s glands with a strong smell. The substance was used in the
medieval period as a perfume fixative and was known since the ancient
times, but it was also used as a treatment.

For example, Peter Schöffer described musk and its properties in his book (Schöffer, 1485), as well as Konrad von Megenberg in ‘Liber de natura rerum’. (Megenberg, 1348- 1350) Reportedly, musk components have anti-inflammatory and antihistamine activity (Evans, 1989). It is worth discussing these facts revealed by the results of the uncoded text of the Voynich manuscript, especially to mention that the words have not been encrypted at all, only the letter ‘s’ in the word ‘mus (go)’ and the letter ‘m’ in the word ‘mel’ were corrupted.

There are a lot of medieval botanical manuscripts, where other authors tried to hide the very names of plants. Especially Medieval manuscripts that were written for Alchemical proposes. ‘Il giardino magico degli alchimisti’ by Vera Segre Rutz (Segre Rutz, 2000) is about the alchemical herbals’ tradition and in particular about the alchemical herbal manuscript from Biblioteca Universitaria, MS Aldini 211. It is written in Vulgar Latin and describes almost fifty plants that cannot be identified with certainty. Obviously, some names of 13 plants seem to be corruptions of known names e.g. ‘Antolla’ for ‘Anthyllis’, ‘Ariola’ for ‘Oriola’. 23 plant names are strongly corrupted for e.g. ‘Metries’ for ‘Myrtus’, ‘Rigogola’ for ‘Galega’. The Schoenberg Center for Electronic Text & Image at the University of Pennsylvania Library has a very wonderful manuscript with ciphered names of plants as well as in the Voynich Manuscript. Manuscript Number is ‘ljs419’ Italy, of XV century is a typical of the medieval Apuleius herbal. But it has corrupted botanical names of plant on 71r folia. As well as the name of plant ‘Pepeko’ 24r, that is probably is one of the species of peony in real. | P E O N I O |. In reason, on the next folia there is another kind of peony: 24v: ‘Peonia’.

5. Conclusion.

The linguistic analysis of this article leads to the following conclusions.
The study of the Voynich manuscript marginalia have incredible
results. The Voynich Manuscript marginalia on the folio 66r provide a
complete description and a translation of the medieval Galician language.
It underlines the results of my dissertation and found clear support for
the medieval Galician that was used in the Voynich manuscript.
That proves once again the fairness of my innovative research results
such as the analysis of the morphology of the structure of words, the
analysis of sentence structures, the semantics of words, the
lexicology of words and the vernacular names of plants, which
exist even in Galician in the present as well.

References.
Bacon, Roger.(1270). ‘Epistola Fratris Rog. Baconis, de secretis operibus artis et naturae et null magitate’ (‘The Message of the Monk Roger Bacon on the secret actions of art and nature and the Nobility of Magic’).

Barreiro, M. C. (1995). A documentación notarial do concello de Noia (ss. XIV-XVI). [Glosario, 155–456]. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.

Cheshire, G. Ed. (2017) ‘Linguistic missing links: instruction in decrypting, translating and transliterating the only document known to use both proto-Romance language and protoItalic symbols for its writing system. Science Survey 1, (1–47.October 11, 2017).

Cheshire, G. Ed. (2018). ‘Linguistically dating and locating the origin of Manuscript MS408’ University of Bristol. Science Survey 2. (January 12th, 2018, 1–36). Cheshire, G. Ed. (2019). Plant Series, №2. Manuscript MS408. Science Survey, October 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02639904.2019.1599566 Cheshire, G. Ed. (2019). The Language and Writing System of MS408“ (Voynich) Explained . Journal Romance Studies Volume 37, (2019, Apr 29 — Issue 1, 30–67).

Evans, W. (1989). ‘Trease and Evans ‘Pharmacognosy’. 13th ed. Oxford, England: The Alden Press. Ferreiro, M. (2001). Gramática Histórica Galega, 2 vols. [2nd ed.]. Santiago de Compostela: Laiovento.

Gladyseva, A. (2019). Criptografía de Tehillim. Vilnius: Gladyseva. Gladyseva, A. (2019). Deciphering of the WHOLE text of the Voynich Manuscript by Alisa Gladyseva”. Vilnius: isbn 978–609–475–419–7.

Gladyseva, A. (2019). Un sistema criptográfico basado en la sustitución homofónica en el poema hermético De rerum natura de Titus Lucretius Carus (99 a. C. — 55 a. C.). Vilnius: Gladyseva. Herman, J. (2000). Vulgar Latin. (R. Translated by Wright, Trans.) University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Hernández Gómez, S. (2010). Análisis de textos cifrados de los siglos xvi y xvii. https://earchivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/11110/PFC_Sara_Gomez_Hernandez.pdf

Lorenzo, R. (1968). Sobre cronologia do vocabulário galego-português. Vigo: Galaxia.

Lorenzo, R. (1977). La traducción gallega de la Crónica General y de la Crónica de Castilla. Vol. II (Glosario). Ourense: Instituto de Estudios Orensanos Padre Feijóo.

Megenberg, v. K. (1348–1350). Liber de natura rerum. Mettmann, W. M. (1972). Cantigas de Santa María de Afonso X, o Sábio. Vol. IV (Glossário). Coimbra: Universidade. Nill, A. (1936). With a note, listing the letter’s contents: “C) me my work on cipher ms.”.

Panofsky, E. (1932). ‘Panofsky’s comments of 1932'.

Panofsky, E. (1954). Panofsky’s responses of 1954. Military cryptanalysts.

Parker, K. M. (1958). Vocabulario de la Crónica Troyana. Salamanca : Universidad. Polybius. [146 a.C](1922). The Histories X.45.6. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/10*.html#45.6

Queixas Zas, M. (2001). Historia xeral da literatura galega. Vigo: A nosa terra. p. 14. ISBN 978–84–95350–79–4.

Rugg, G. (2004). The mystery of the Voynich Manuscript. Scientific American.

Rutz, V. S. (2000). Il giardino magico degli alchimisti: un erbario illustrato trecentesco della Biblioteca universitaria di Pavia e la sua tradizione. Il polifilo.

Schöffer, P. (1485). Gart der Gesundheit. (Hortus sanitatis). Mainz.

Simonetta, C. (1474). Cipher-Breaking Rules Augusto Buonafalce Rules for Decrypting Enciphered Documents Without a Key. Pavia.

Souto Cabo, J. A. ( 2008). Documentos galego-portugueses dos séculos XII e XIII. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.

According to the results of innovative research: the Voynich manuscript was written in medieval Galician (Galician-Portuguese). Its coding algorithm was influenced by the substitution cipher of using a polyalphabetic cipher for the most part of its text, as well as it was definitely influenced by transposition cipher for double ciphered alchemical text.

THE DECIPHERING THE WHOLE TEXT OF THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT BY ALISA GLADYŠEVA.

The linguistic basis of the text, index and analysis. Department of Spanish Philology, Vilnius University.

The first print is a limited-edition, non-commercial, nonprofit, dedicated to science popularization proposals for foreign editors, publishers and research academic societies.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. Alisa Gladyševa © All Rights Reserved. ISBN: 978–609–475–419–7

Dedication. Declaration. Abstract. Acknowledgements

Contents. 7.1 THE COMPLETE LIST OF ALL THE BOTANICAL NAMES DETERMINATED IN THE VOYNICH MANUSCRIPT WITH LATIN TAXONOMY, VERNACULAR BOTANICAL NAMES AND LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGIN OF NOMENCLATURES WITH THEIR SOURCES IN THE MEDIEVAL PERIOD.

All botanical names that have been identified in the Voynich Manuscript have been deciphered and read in the very text of the Voynich Manuscript.

It is the only research of the Voynich Manuscript that is primarily and generally based on its linguistic source — the lexicology, but not on the analysis of phytomorphs’ similarities with herbarium specimens that were always made by other researchers ( J. Janick, A.O. Tucker, 2017; Stephen Bax, 2014) that led to wrong encompassing of plant species due to difficulty of determination.

Therefore, less than 10 percent of plants that were determined by other researchers are correct. Some of the researchers for e.g. Gerard Cheshire (G. Cheshire, 2019), even suggested that there are no botanical names at the whole Voynich manuscript due to their absence in the medieval period, therefore his research results are double incorrect.

Important that these innovative research results are succesfull. All 131 plants have been deciphered. pages 139–172 Information for publishers and editors of the scientific journals, the author is open to publish any chapter of “Decoding the whole text of the Voynich manuscript by Alisa Gladyseva” .

Since the submission of scientific articles for publication in scientific journals must not have been previously published nor has it been submitted for consideration by any other journal, the information on the content of some chapters is omitted in the preview of this book “Decoding the whole text of the Voynich manuscript by Alisa Gladyseva” .

The Deciphering The Whole Text Of The Voynich Manuscript By Alisa Gladyseva : Voynich Manuscript; Alisa Gladyseva : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

“Deciphering of the WHOLE text of the Voynich Manuscript by Alisa Gladyseva”, research years © 2015–2019 Alisa Gladyseva. All rights reserved. Vilnius: isbn 978–609–475–419–7. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. The first print is a limited-edition, non- commercial, nonprofit, dedicated to science popularization proposals for foreign editors, publishers, and research societies.

According to the results of innovative research: the Voynich manuscript was written in medieval Galician (Galician-Portuguese). Its coding algorithm was influenced by the substitution cipher of using a polyalphabetic cipher for the most part of its text, as well as it was definitely influenced by transposition cipher for double ciphered alchemical text.

The key to a decipherment of the Voynich Manuscript was a plant Lavandula. Analyzing the text of the Voynich Manuscript was found paleography of its characters:‘L’ ‘A’ ‘V’ ‘A’ N’ ‘D’. It was made possible to the conception of decipherment: to find out the whole alphabet, with the help of other names of plants. Ability to analyze text of the Voynich Manuscript to recognize which information was relevant (in this case names of plants), made possible to determine at what point there was sufficient information to solve decipherment. There are only a few flowers that have its Latin names in the Voynich Manuscript, for e.g. ‘Capsella bursa-pastoris’ (other names of plants carry culture-specific ethnobotanical vernacular meanings). Detailed analytic studies the paleography of its characters was made possible to definite the letters ‘B’ “U’ ‘R’ ‘S’ ‘P’ ‘S’ ‘T’ for further successful accessible reading of the whole Voynich Manuscript text. The whole alphabet of the Voynich manuscript is deciphered as well as the whole text of the Voynich manuscript.

“Deciphering of the WHOLE text of the Voynich Manuscript by Alisa Gladyseva”, research years © 2015–2019 Alisa Gladyseva. All rights reserved. Vilnius: isbn 978–609–475–419–7. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. The first print is a limited-edition, non- commercial, nonprofit, dedicated to science popularization proposals for foreign editors, publishers, and research societies.

Scientific Journal Citation: Gladyševa, A. (2020). «Voynich manuscript — Analysis of the codification algorithm with the encryption methods known in the medieval time and results of the marginalia that were not encrypted». Revista Científica Arbitrada de la Fundación MenteClara, Vol. 5 (128). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32351/rca.v5.128
Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338416501_ANALYSIS_CODING_ALGORITHM_WITH_THE_KNOWN_IN_MEDIEVAL_PERIOD_METHODS_OF_CIPHERING_AND_RESULTS_OF_THE_UNENCRYPTED_MARGINALIA_OF_THE_VOYNICH_MANUSCRIPT_Manuscrito_de_Voynich_-_Analisis_del_algoritmo_de_c [accessed Jun 24 2020].