Background Context

Society has been accustomed to a slow impact from a gradually increasing rate of innovation change. For instance, this is how long it generally took the concepts of these impacts to make their way around the world:

- A few thousand years for farming.

- A few centuries for metalwork.

- A century for the Industrial Revolution.

- A few decades for personal computers.

In modern society, the rate of innovation is significantly accelerating, especially in biotech, advanced chip design, nanotech and regenerative robotics. Yet, the rate of innovation that’s outpacing all others is happening within the field of computer technology. A public example of that was when Google announced a few years ago it had successfully tested the quantum computer it had been creating. Google said their machine was able to finish a computational task in just 200 seconds — and that the world’s most powerful supercomputers would need 10,000 years to accomplish the same task.

Then specifically, the branch within computer technology that has the highest rate of change is AI. A public example of that was when an AI engineer, working on LaMDA, Google’s AI chatbot generator, publicly announced recently that he thought LaMDA became sentient. Furthermore, this rate of change is also paired with the highest rate of societal adoption of AI innovation. A public example of that is ChatGPT, an app developed by Open AI, which reached 100 million users in just two months.

Future Problems

Since AI will have the unique combination of having the highest innovation rate as well as the highest adoption rate, it will replace human labor in:

- Core government systems such as; military, police, education and judicial.

- Dozens of individual-oriented white-collar fields such as; journalism, legal, finance, medicine, coding, tech, administrative and STEM.

- Dozens of team-oriented blue-collar fields which will use thousands of different types of robotic automation integrated with AI. This will range from the simplest fast-food services to the most complex aerospace construction.

This immense impact on society will also happen very quickly because AI will be continuously:

- Using centrally located server structures that will be accessible by anyone, anywhere, anytime in the world.

- Learning all the new information that is published and then using that information to improve its abilities.

- Learning from billions of new interactions with humans and then using those experiences to improve its abilities.

- Innovating incrementally by cross-pollinating the learned new information and experiences within one field to improve processes within another field.

In short, the impact of AI will revolutionize society further and faster than all other innovation in history combined. That’s why business consulting firm McKinsey & Company reckons that, depending upon various adoption scenarios, automation will displace between 400 and 800 million jobs by 2030, requiring as many as 375 million people to switch job categories entirely. But society won’t need to wait for the complete AI revolution to happen to see huge job loss numbers. Even as the AI revolution begins a unique market condition will be initiated where corporations, in multiple fields that AI is impacting, will initiate layoffs simultaneously. This will launch a massive labor market disruption, as unemployed white-collar workers with college degrees will be forced to compete for fewer corporate jobs across all fields.

At that point, there will be significant volatility as many old large corporations are destroyed and new smaller corporations are created (i.e. Creative Destruction). Success will not be achieved by the strongest corporations nor by the ones with the most intelligent workers. Success will only be achieved by those corporations most adaptable to change. That new reality will undeniably affirm that a corporate system and an ecological system are both governed by the same Charles Darwin principle: “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one most adaptable to change”.

Another system governed by Darwin’s principle is the system of U.S. Education. But this system has great difficulty adapting to change and still focuses on an obsolete core function of grading students on how well they memorize information. So when the inescapable massive labor market disruption starts, students and their parents will be hit by the painful reality that the current education system is no longer relevant within society. Students will then start to frantically look for alternative learning systems and leave U.S. Education. That’s why the current U.S. Education system will be one of the first to be destroyed by the AI revolution. This will in turn destroy most of the Universities as well because high school students will no longer be there to feed into them, and four-year degrees will become immaterial.

In response to a collapsing education system, politicians, administrators and educators will:

- Not understand that the root cause behind the collapse of a several hundred billion dollar system, that they thought was so strong and intelligent, is that it’s not adaptable to change.

- Be stunned by the brutal speed of the collapse and scramble to implement reactive fixes.

- Have no long-term solutions to transition an entire education system from being obsolete to being relevant.

Breakthrough Solutions

During the AI revolution three critical questions will emerge in society:

1. What unique ability do humans have to make them successful in the age of AI?

2. How can that unique ability be continually developed?

3. What kind of education system is adaptable to change?

Let’s answer these three questions here by doing what breakthrough innovators do, and that’s project disruptive concepts into the future that cannot yet be experienced directly. Furthermore, these concepts will be outlined as processes. This is because explaining concepts through a process separates credible concepts from those that are not. Ultimately, if someone can’t explain what they are talking about as a process, then they don’t know what they’re talking about.

Answer To Question #1:

In the future, humans will need to have the ability to come to work and do something new every day. If they need to be told what to do at work by management then they won’t be needed because AI will be able to do it. This will require humans to hone their unique potential ability for creativity. This ability is unique because AI will never have creativity. AI only seems to function with creativity because the results of those functions imitate what humans currently label as creativity in themselves. Yet this is an incorrect projection of a human perspective onto AI. Alongside intelligence, humans have the unique attributes of intuition and emotion that are required for creativity, while AI only has intelligence. This means that many of the functions humans currently do, that AI can do as well, are mislabeled as creativity. So in the future, society will more accurately define the functions that humans and AI share as exploration, curiosity, experimentation, strategic thinking, incremental innovation, amusement etc, but not as functions of creativity.

With clarification given on what creativity is not, creativity will now be defined as what it is. Creativity always requires humans to:

A) Start out by asking questions, internally and/or sharing verbally with others externally. The action of asking questions is the most powerful metaphysical tool humans have. Without asking questions humans would have great difficulty focusing on and improving what they are doing or retaining any new information. Without questions, learning and innovation becomes nearly impossible.

B) Understand their present reality (i.e Present Paradigm) and come up with new destination ideas (i.e. New Paradigm), while connecting (i.e. Connecting Paradigm) their present reality with their new destination.

C) Function effectively while thinking through their multiple paradigms in a constantly changing environment. This means that a constantly changing environment also forces a constant change in the present, new and connecting paradigms as well. For example, AI can drive cars and fly planes as long as the conditions of the environment within which the AI is functioning does not change. So if a wheel comes of a driving car and/or there are severe accidents along with dangerous road conditions, then AI will completely fail. Respectively, if a wing is ripped of a flying plane and/or there is significant debris along with turbulent weather conditions, then AI will completely fail. Only the human attributes of intuition and emotion, which AI will NEVER have the computation capability to match (no matter how powerful it becomes in the future), gives humans the creative potential to survive and succeed in the most extreme constantly changing environments.

So the definition of creativity that can be collectively shared by society would be:

Holding in mind the present paradigm, then coming up with a new destination paradigm and connecting paradigm, while functioning effectively in a changing environment.

This is the intense process creative artists push themselves to go through in order to stay relevant and avoid becoming obsolete. Furthermore, the top artists employ a continuous stream of internal questioning that accesses their intuition and emotion to empower them to the highest level of creativity. In the future, this same process is what humans will have to go through to use all advancing technology as tools, or otherwise they will be made obsolete by that same technology.

Yet, advancing technology used in all organizations, from education to NGO’s to corporations, will require humans to work as teams. To date it has been assumed that highly creative humans are lone wolves that can’t work in teams. This assumption is wrong. The propensity through history for highly creative humans to work alone has been solely due to their internal drive to go around the obstructions they faced to achieve their goals and visions. But a team is simply a group of humans that coordinate their actions toward a shared goal or vision. So if highly creative workers in any organization come together to do this, they can coordinate as autonomous members within a team and achieve exceptional outcomes. As an example, look at the music domain from a corporate perspective. Highly creative musicians improvising together in a group, sharing the same goal and vision, is a team.

Answer To Question #2:

Creativity is completely interconnected with the brain/mind dynamic. But to date, the attempts to explain that dynamic have used vague descriptions along with disconnected studies and concepts. So the development of creativity can only be achieved if there is first a coherent, directionally accurate, explanation of the brain/mind dynamic as a process. This process has been alluded to in philosophical and religious terms for thousands of years. Here it will be described simply through an advanced computer paradigm:

The brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard/hardware while the mind is the operating system/software that runs and wires the brain. In this process, the mind’s speed and transmission capacity is limited by the physical brain’s wiring. So the brain is being constantly re-wired by the mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing speed and transmission capacity needs. Also, there is different wiring of the brain to accommodate the mind’s need for either creativity or conformity. The mind wiring the brain for creativity simultaneously increases the brains neural connections and information transmission capacity (i.e. Upgrading Biological Hardware). In turn, the brain’s increased potential enables the mind to then increase its operational speed and capacity to evolve in complexity. This self-reinforcing loop enabling the mind to upgrade has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. (i.e. Upgrading Cognitive Software). Within this process, emotion and intuition act as catalysts to continuously influence and motivate the mind to wire the brain.

Like a computer operating system/software is comprised of multiple components, so is the mind. Two of those mind components are the emotion and intuition. Another mind component is Divergent Thought, which is divided into three distinct types of thinking — Creative Thought, Reactive Thought and Rational Thought. But the main mind component is ‘you’ the ‘Self’, which is the identity you sense and perceive your-self to be. You are also the decision maker and the only component that asks questions. Furthermore, out of all the mind components, only you (the Self) are curious and can ask questions. Your questions command the focus of all the other mind components on the topic of the question asked and then simultaneously opens an area in your mind for new ideas, answers and solutions to enter. (i.e. Cognitive Command Prompt). If you already had the answers you needed within your memory of experiences, then you would not be asking a question. The act of asking questions means you are seeking information from a source outside of your memory. So when you ask questions internally, the responses come in the form of information-based choices from your Divergent Thought, as well as physiological-based responses from emotion and intuition. Then you perceive those responses as answers to the questions you asked. Hence at its core, internal creativity is always a process of collaboration. More in-depth information on this at: Why The Mind Wires The Brain For Creativity Or Conformity

With the disclosure of this paradigm, a new inter-connected understanding is now possible of the four domains that have the greatest potential for stimulating the mind to wire the brain for creativity. While some of these domains have been engaged with separately at different levels in variable settings, their full potential impact on students can only be realized once they are integrated within a curriculum system:

The first domain is profession-based experiential learning. This domain has been experimented with a lot in education. It is exemplified by the national CAPS Network. More in-depth information on this at: YourCapsNetwork.org

The second domain has been known for millennia. It’s the domain that every child naturally, intuitively, emotionally and physically desires to engage in. This is the domain of dancing, singing, drawing, acting/pretending and making music. The result of this engagement has the mind wiring the brain for creativity, which is especially critical and impactful on a child’s brain that is still mailable. In the last few centuries this domain has been termed as ‘the arts’. But in the coming age of AI, this domain will become better understood as one of the most powerful platforms to stimulate the mind to wire the brain for creativity. But within this domain, one discipline is the most powerful in this function. This discipline is the engagement in music training on an acoustic instrument. More in-depth information on this at: Music-Advocacy.com

The third domain is the engagement with ideas and problem solving. In contrast, this domain has been shrouded in ambiguity. Throughout history, this domain was only truly understood by a very small percentage of individuals within society who were the breakthrough innovators in their specific fields. In this domain, breakthrough innovators naturally and instinctively understood how they could use questions to intentionally access new information from their mind components to generate new ideas and problem solve. Philosophers and scientist have defined that powerful cognitive process as doing ‘Thought Experiments’. Now this powerful process has been unmasked and developed into a free 90-minute online course called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. More in-depth information on this at: OIsource.com

The fourth domain is team-oriented computer gaming. This develops the mind’s ability for spontaneous decision-making and collaboration. Students engaged in this domain learn by playing random new computer games that they don’t know the rules to, along with teaming up with random new players. Fun and struggle are co-mingled in this process as teams are thrown together to try and to figure out rules and navigate a successful strategy for each new game (i.e. Work The Problem). This is a process of continually exposing the mind to the experience of adapting to low-level adversity of changing environments (i.e. Controlled Adversity). Learning to ‘work the problem’ under ‘controlled adversity’ as a student is the cornerstone to developing a skill as an adult to succeed in any future adversity of constantly changing high-level opportunity and threat environments. This domain of team-oriented computer gaming is currently being implemented in the Elon Musk launched schools of Synthesis. More in-depth information on this at: Synthesis.com

The one connection that runs through all these domains is that they all engage with the potential of failure. This is because only by constantly engaging with the potential of failure can a human get comfortable enough to ultimately take the needed risks to succeed. This has been understood and proven through history in one other domain, and that’s sports. Michael Jordan explained it best when he said:

“I’ve missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I’ve lost almost 300 games. 26 times, I’ve been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed.”

This insight matters when analyzing today’s education system. Because within the main focus of U.S. Education to grade students on memorized information, failure is avoided, discouraged and punished.

Answer To Question #3:

Throughout history, memorizing information has been a valued and rewarded skill. This was because information was closely guarded and extremely difficult to disseminate. Hence memorized information had always been used for survival and success. Yet in our age where all information has become a free commodity, that is accessible from anywhere, the skill of being able to memorize information is worthless. Einstein understood this almost a century ago when he noted: “Never memorize something that you can look up.” Now the only value information has is how effectively it can be searched for, found, aggregated, and creatively transformed. But U.S. Education does not teach that type of creative skill. This is a critical flaw in U.S. Education because now the era of mass production will be ending and the era of mass customization will begin. In turn, the era of human labor will also be ending and the era of human creativity will begin.

As corporations start needing more workers that have the skill of creativity, they will recognize that a growing and sustainable U.S. economy is completely hinged to the success of not only developing young minds to think creatively as they are forming but to also develop breakthrough innovators. (This is because breakthrough innovators have the cognitive abilities to push/pull society to evolve no matter how intransigent the conditions are around them. More in-depth information on this at: Why Information For All Future Breakthrough Innovation Already Exists) Only then will the combined focus of government and corporate attention, in their-own self-interest, turn to U.S. Education. Tremendous resources will be invested into experiments to develop a new education system. Yet educators will not be able to explain, as a process, how to establish and then continually innovate such a new system. Furthermore, any proposed curriculum will need to be sustainable, scalable and innovate ahead of the needs of an evolving society around it. Yes, U.S. Education should be years ahead and not years behind society. Consequently, many decades and generations of students will be lost until a final new system emerges that can scale throughout all of U.S. Education. That final new education system will be presented here and now as breakthrough innovation.

This new education system is called LED Accelerator, which stands for Leadership Empowering Diversity. It will be based on the four domains of profession-based experiential learning, the arts, ITP and team-oriented computer gaming. LED Accelerator would be a dual system within U.S. Education that will develop selected gifted students to become future high-level creative thinkers, breakthrough innovators and adult leaders. LED Accelerator would share the goals of other dual systems like Xerox, PARC, DARPA and Google X that were created to be vertically intensive within their respective parent organization.

LED Accelerator would also operate like a startup accelerator, empowering its participating students to collaborate and compete in using tools that exist in the current world to manifest the products and services they intuitively see existing in the future world. This dual system will be sustainable because the self-directed LED Accelerator student teams, within each school district, will be utilizing best practices, learning strategies and interactive cultures within the constant adversity of hyper-changing environments. The outcome will be hyper-changing curriculum and team achievements.

Through this process, LED Accelerator will provide the internally generated evidence-based data for educators and administrators to analyze and then decide on which aspect to use to continually advance the rest of U.S. Education, the respective parent organization of LED Accelerator. So the current process of relying on failed guesses of ‘education experts’ to originate future curriculum and doctrines will cease.

The intense adversity of LED Accelerator will also develop students to become the future leaders in society, because great leaders can only be forged through adversity. This will require in-person adult mentoring of students on integrity because the development of integrity in an adolescent cannot be achieved through self-direction and must have an adult guiding it. Leaders without integrity will use their influence and technology to hurt society rather than help it. Warren Buffet explained it best when he said:

“In looking for people to hire, look for three qualities, integrity, intelligence and energy. And if they don’t have the first the other two will kill you.”

In turn, the LED Accelerator students who become the future leaders, will then continually guide an accelerated evolution of U.S. social, economic, government and military advancement. More in-depth information on this at: LEDaccelerator.com

In the past, societal evolution has always been driven by the reactive action of human nature, which waits until the point-of-pain to deal with radical disruptions. The information outlined hereto gives a unique opportunity for society, and specifically U.S. Education, to take a creative action instead. U.S. Education can engage the quickly approaching disruptive future by launching LED Accelerator now, rather than waiting until the point-of-pain that future will bring.

Why The AI Revolution Will Destroy U.S. Education was originally published in Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Background Context

Society has been accustomed to a slow impact from a gradually increasing rate of innovation change. For instance, this is how long it generally took the concepts of these impacts to make their way around the world:

- A few thousand years for farming.
- A few centuries for metalwork.
- A century for the Industrial Revolution.
- A few decades for personal computers.

In modern society, the rate of innovation is significantly accelerating, especially in biotech, advanced chip design, nanotech and regenerative robotics. Yet, the rate of innovation that’s outpacing all others is happening within the field of computer technology. A public example of that was when Google announced a few years ago it had successfully tested the quantum computer it had been creating. Google said their machine was able to finish a computational task in just 200 seconds — and that the world’s most powerful supercomputers would need 10,000 years to accomplish the same task.

Then specifically, the branch within computer technology that has the highest rate of change is AI. A public example of that was when an AI engineer, working on LaMDA, Google’s AI chatbot generator, publicly announced recently that he thought LaMDA became sentient. Furthermore, this rate of change is also paired with the highest rate of societal adoption of AI innovation. A public example of that is ChatGPT, an app developed by Open AI, which reached 100 million users in just two months.

Forced Disruption

Since AI will have the unique combination of having the highest innovation rate as well as the highest adoption rate, it will replace human labor in:

- Core government systems such as; military, police, education and judicial.

- Dozens of individual-oriented white-collar fields such as; journalism, legal, finance, medicine, coding, tech, administrative and all STEM fields.

- Dozens of team-oriented blue-collar fields which will use thousands of different types of robotic automation integrated with AI. This will range from the simplest fast-food services to the most complex aerospace construction.

This immense impact on society will also happen very quickly because AI will be continuously:

- Using centrally located server structures that will be accessible by anyone, anywhere, anytime in the world.

- Learning all the new information that is published and then using that information to improve its abilities.

- Learning from billions of new interactions with humans and then using those experiences to improve its abilities.

- Innovating incrementally by cross-pollinating the learned new information and experiences within one field to improve processes within another field.

In short, the impact of the AI revolution will scale faster than all other innovation in history combined. That’s why business consulting firm McKinsey & Company reckons that, depending upon various adoption scenarios, automation will displace between 400 and 800 million jobs by 2030, requiring as many as 375 million people to switch job categories entirely. But society won’t need to wait for the complete AI revolution to happen to see huge job loss numbers. Even as the AI revolution begins a unique market condition will be initiated where corporations, in multiple fields that AI is impacting, will initiate layoffs simultaneously. This will launch a massive labor market disruption, as unemployed white-collar workers will be forced to compete for fewer corporate jobs across all fields. This market disruption will cause most workers wages to significantly decrease while simultaneously increasing the wages of those that adapt the best to using AI to benefit the corporation.

At that point, many old careers will be destroyed and new ones will be created. Furthermore, many old corporations will be destroyed and new ones will be created. Consequently, the AI revolution will force a radical market disruption (i.e. Creative Destruction). Success will not be achieved by the strongest and most intelligent workers and corporations. Success will only be achieved by those workers and corporations most adaptable to change. That new reality will undeniably affirm that the labor, corporate and ecological systems are all governed by the same Charles Darwin principle: “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one most adaptable to change”.

Breakthrough Paradigm

During the AI revolution two critical questions will emerge in society:

1. What unique ability do humans have to make them successful in the age of AI?

2. How can that unique ability be continually developed?

Let’s answer these two questions here by doing what breakthrough innovators do, and that’s project disruptive concepts into the future that cannot yet be experienced directly. Furthermore, these concepts will be outlined as processes. This is because explaining concepts through a process separates credible concepts from those that are not. Ultimately, if someone can’t explain what they are talking about as a process, then they don’t know what they’re talking about.

Answer To Question #1:

In the future, humans will need to have the ability to come to work and do something new every day. If they need to be told what to do at work by management then they won’t be needed because AI will be able to do it. This will require humans to hone their unique potential ability for creativity. This ability is unique because AI will never have creativity. AI only seems to function with creativity because the results of those functions imitate what humans currently label as creativity in themselves. Yet this is an incorrect projection of a human perspective onto AI. Alongside intelligence, humans have the unique attributes of intuition and emotion that are required for creativity, while AI only has intelligence. This means that many of the functions humans currently do, that AI can do as well, are mislabeled as creativity. So in the future, society will more accurately define the functions that humans and AI share as exploration, curiosity, experimentation, strategic thinking, incremental innovation, amusement etc, but not as functions of creativity.

With clarification given on what creativity is not, creativity will now be defined as what it is. Creativity always requires humans to:

A) Start out by asking questions, internally and/or sharing verbally with others externally. The action of asking questions is the most powerful metaphysical tool humans have. Without asking questions humans would have great difficulty focusing on and improving what they are doing or retaining any new information. Without questions, learning and innovation becomes nearly impossible.

B) Understand their present reality (i.e Present Paradigm) and come up with new destination ideas (i.e. New Paradigm), while connecting (i.e. Connecting Paradigm) their present reality with their new destination.

C) Function effectively while thinking through their multiple paradigms in a constantly changing environment. This means that a constantly changing environment also forces a constant change in the present, new and connecting paradigms as well. For example, AI can drive cars and fly planes as long as the conditions of the environment within which the AI is functioning does not change. So if a wheel comes of a driving car and/or there are severe accidents along with dangerous road conditions, then AI will completely fail. Respectively, if a wing is ripped of a flying plane and/or there is significant debris along with turbulent weather conditions, then AI will completely fail. Only the human attributes of intuition and emotion, which AI will NEVER have the computation capability to match (no matter how powerful it becomes in the future), gives humans the creative potential to survive and succeed in the most extreme constantly changing environments.

So the definition of creativity that can be collectively shared by society would be:

Holding in mind the present paradigm, then coming up with a new destination paradigm and connecting paradigm, while functioning effectively in a changing environment.

This is the intense process creative artists push themselves to go through in order to stay relevant and avoid becoming obsolete. Furthermore, the top artists employ a continuous stream of internal questioning that accesses their intuition and emotion to empower them to the highest level of creativity. In the future, this same process is what humans will have to go through to develop their creative ability and use all advancing technology as tools, or otherwise they will be made obsolete by that same technology.

Answer To Question #2:

Creativity is completely interconnected with the brain/mind dynamic. But to date, the attempts to explain that dynamic have used vague descriptions along with disconnected studies and concepts. So the development of creativity can only be achieved if there is first a coherent, directionally accurate, explanation of the brain/mind dynamic as a process. This process has been alluded to in philosophical and religious terms for thousands of years. Here it will be described simply through an advanced computer paradigm:

The brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard/hardware while the mind is the operating system/software that runs and wires the brain. In this process, the mind’s speed and transmission capacity is limited by the physical brain’s wiring. So the brain is being constantly re-wired by the mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing speed and transmission capacity needs. Also, there is different wiring of the brain to accommodate the mind’s need for either creativity or conformity. The mind wiring the brain for creativity simultaneously increases the brains neural connections and information transmission capacity (i.e. Upgrading Biological Hardware). In turn, the brain’s increased potential enables the mind to then increase its operational speed and capacity to evolve in complexity. This self-reinforcing loop enabling the mind to upgrade has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. (i.e. Upgrading Cognitive Software). Within this process, emotion and intuition act as catalysts to continuously influence and motivate the mind to wire the brain.

Like a computer operating system/software is comprised of multiple components, so is the mind. Two of those mind components are the emotion and intuition. Another mind component is Divergent Thought, which is divided into three distinct types of thinking — Creative Thought, Reactive Thought and Rational Thought. But the main mind component is ‘you’ the ‘Self’, which is the identity you sense and perceive your-self to be. You are also the decision maker and the only component that asks questions. Furthermore, out of all the mind components, only you (the Self) are curious and can ask questions. Your questions command the focus of all the other mind components on the topic of the question asked and then simultaneously opens an area in your mind for new ideas, answers and solutions to enter. (i.e. Cognitive Command Prompt). If you already had the answers you needed within your memory of experiences, then you would not be asking a question. The act of asking questions means you are seeking information from a source outside of your memory. So when you ask questions internally, the responses come in the form of information-based choices from your Divergent Thought, as well as physiological-based responses from emotion and intuition. Then you perceive those responses as answers to the questions you asked. Hence at its core, internal creativity is always a process of collaboration. More in-depth information on this at: Why The Mind Wires The Brain For Creativity Or Conformity

Stimulating Creativity

With the disclosure of this breakthrough paradigm, a new understanding is now possible of two domains that have the greatest potential for stimulating the mind to wire the brain for creativity:

The first domain has been known for millennia. It’s the domain that every child naturally, intuitively, emotionally and physically desires to engage in. This is the domain of dancing, singing, drawing, acting/pretending and making music. This designed condition for all humans initiates the engagement of the mind wiring the brain for creativity. In the last few centuries this domain has been termed as ‘the arts’. But in the coming age of AI, this domain will become better understood as one of the most powerful platforms to stimulate the mind to wire the brain for creativity. But within this domain, one discipline is the most powerful in this function. This discipline is the engagement in music training and playing on an acoustic instrument. More in-depth information on this at: The Process Einstein Used To Simulate Creativity And Why It Worked

The second domain is the engagement with ideas and problem solving. In contrast, this domain has been shrouded in ambiguity. Throughout history, this domain was only truly understood by a very small percentage of individuals within society who were the breakthrough innovators in their specific fields. In this domain, breakthrough innovators naturally and instinctively understood how they could use questions to intentionally access new information from their mind components to generate new ideas and problem solve. Philosophers and scientist have defined that powerful cognitive process as doing ‘Thought Experiments’. Now this powerful process has been unmasked and developed into a free 90-minute online course called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. More in-depth information on this at: OIsource.com

In the past, societal evolution has always been driven by the reactive action of human nature, which waits until the point-of-pain to deal with radical disruptions. The information outlined hereto gives a unique opportunity for individuals and corporations to take a creative action, instead of waiting until the point-of-pain the future will bring. Individuals can proactively start playing on an acoustic instrument and using the ITP to give themselves an advantage ahead of the approaching market disruption. Corporations can proactively set up a new culture of ensemble music groups for their corporate teams to play in, as well as start their teams using the ITP to brainstorm and innovate. The individuals and corporations that start engaging in these actions now will give themselves the best opportunity to stimulate their creativity in order to command the market and successfully transition through the approaching disruption.

Why The AI Revolution Will Force Disruption And Human Creativity Will Command The Market was originally published in Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Our reality is a framework in which the brain exists to harbor the mind and the biological body exists to move the brain. Essentially, the biological body is simply an avatar vehicle which is used by the ‘cognitive’ mind to interact within a ‘physical’ world. This interaction is possible because matter is comprised of ‘physical’ components derived from the quantum field and the mind is comprised of ‘cognitive’ components derived from the quantum field. Because both matter and mind are derived from the quantum field, is the reason why physicist have found them to be inseparable in their interaction (e.g. observer effect). To facilitate this interaction, the mind constantly alters the brain it’s using to accommodate its needs. This is accomplished by the mind neurologically wiring the brain for either creativity or conformity. It’s always a binary process of the mind wiring for one or the other. So with every thought, word, and action taken, the mind is wiring the brain. In psychology the phrase used for this process is ‘what fires together wires together’. When the brain is wired for creativity then that is labeled in psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. This is accomplished by the brain being wired with more diverse neural pathways across more areas of the brain (i.e. neural diversity). This has the result of the mind being able to process information in different ways through different neural pathways within the brain. When the mind is wiring the brain for conformity the neural pathways are more localized and uniform. This achieves the result of facilitating the same type of uniform information being able to move faster and easier through those uniform neural pathways. It may seem as if wiring a brain for conformity is unproductive. But a brain wired for conformity is required for all simpler biological bodies, like animals and insects, so they can react quicker for survival. Also, a brain wired for conformity benefited society for hundreds of thousands of years because it allowed a human to do similar work repeatedly and more effectively. In contrast, a creative human in that same situation would have become disinterested and unproductive if limited to doing similar work repeatedly. So throughout history having a brain wired for conformity is what actually helped average humans survive and succeed. But in today’s modern society where technology is replacing redundant labor and a high rate of innovation and problem-solving skills are constantly required, only having a brain wired for creativity is what’s going to ensure that a human will survive and succeed.

Of all current models, this breakthrough paradigm of the mind/brain dynamic is the most directionally accurate model, based on mainstream physics. In contrast, mainstream neuroscience has not kept up with physics and has no serious model on the mind/brain dynamic. Mainstream neuroscience is only just coming around to recognizing that the mind is a separate element from the brain. Up to now most neuroscientists were using outdated models which assumed that millions of neurons fire in the brain to miraculously produce the mind. This is off course absurd from a physics standpoint since brain cells break down into molecules, atoms, subatomic particles and then quantum frequencies. Furthermore, if a wider lens is used and research from the fields of psychology and philosophy is applied then it becomes clear that the mind is not only a separate element from the brain but is itself comprised of multiple components. Those mind components will be labeled herein with the psychology/philosophy terms of: Self, Divergent Thought, Intuition and Emotion. This breakthrough paradigm on the brain/mind dynamic is now becoming accepted within a growing body of pioneering neuroscience research, to which some references are given as examples through the article.

Now let’s take a deeper dive into the three core aspects explaining this paradigm. The first aspect outlines the process within the specific dynamic of the brain/mind interaction. This process will be explained through a computer analogy; where the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is a separate operating system/software that runs and restructures the brain. Like a computer operating system/software is comprised of multiple components, so is the mind. You may have always considered your thinking to be the function of one solitary mind component. But it is not. The main mind component is ‘you’ the ‘Self’, which is the identity you sense and perceive your-self to be. You are also the decision maker. Another mind component is Divergent Thought, which is divided into three distinct types of thinking: Creative Thought, Reactive Thought and Rational Thought. All thinking, be it by a computer or a biological body cannot originate from physical components, therefore all thinking is intelligent. [Ref. 1]

Continuing with the computer analogy; the operating system/software and the mechanical hardware are two completely different elements with different functions. Once the mechanical hardware in a computer becomes outdated and obsolete it then can’t handle a new more advanced operating system/software. At that point the mechanical hardware of a computer must be physically disposed and replaced with new mechanical hardware so that a new more advanced operating system/software can be installed. So just like with computers, the cognitive mind and physical brain are two completely different elements. But in a human, the brain is obviously not disposed and replaced. Therefore, the adaptive biological hardware, that is the brain, is physically upgraded through the process of being neurologically re-wired by the self-installing and advancing operating system/software, that is the mind. This is why the mind cannot emerge from the brain. [Ref. 2]

In turn, the mind continually advances by retaining all the information, in the form of experiences which are comprised of every thought, word and action taken. This retained information is in the mind’s memory, which is not located in any one region of the brain. [Ref. 3]

The mind being forced to use and retain increasing amounts of information as it advances is why it becomes necessary for the brain to be constantly wired to accommodate the mind’s needs for increased neural pathways. [Ref. 4]

Since the mind is separate from the brain, it is not just limited to using the neural pathways. The mind can propagate information across the brain by leaping wirelessly from neurons in one section of brain tissue to another. [Ref. 5]

The second aspect of this paradigm on the mind is a deeper dive into who ‘you’ are; the identity you sense and perceive your ‘Self’ to be. Your ‘Self’ identity includes your core attributes of personality, talents, likes, dislikes, strengths, weaknesses and memory. You are also the decision maker. The other mind components of divergent Thought, Intuition and Emotion only present choices for you to make decisions on. These choices are a form of guidance and influence on you that have helped determine who you are now. These other mind components have been guiding and influencing you throughout your whole life as you were making decisions. Influencing you for good and for bad as well as for collaboration and for conflict (i.e. Cognitive Relativity). Yes, this process of interaction between you and your other mind components has been seamless and fluid. But only you the ‘Self’ makes the ultimate decisions on the choices the other mind components present to you. [Ref. 6]

Furthermore, out of all the mind components, only you (the Self) are curious. Only you ask questions. If you already had the answers you needed within your memory of experiences, then you would not be asking questions. The act of asking questions means you are seeking information in the form of answers from a source outside of your memory. So when you ask questions internally, the responses come in the form of information-choices from the other mind components. Then you perceive those choices as answers to the questions you asked. The mind components of Creative and Reactive Thought offer you positive and negative information (respectively) that you did not know before. Rational Thought offers you neutral information. An analogy for these mind components would be comparing them to advanced apps that are used in a mobile device. Those apps offer information that originates from one source, ‘in the cloud’. But that information is customized and personalized for each uniquely configured mobile device. In the case of the mind, the information offered by the mind components also originates from one source, the quantum field. [Ref. 7] That information is also customized and personalized for each uniquely configured mobile device, your brain. And yes, the configuration of your brain is unique, like your body’s iris and fingerprint.

In the past, religions have in their own way described the delineation between you and all the other mind components. But societal evolution has now advanced enough for these concepts to finally be openly explained in scientific terms. [Ref. 8]. One of those scientific terms is labeling all the thinking that happens within the mind as intelligence.

The third aspect of this paradigm on the mind deals with why humans ‘feel’ that our intelligence is special. This is because of emotion, the most impactful component of the mind. Emotion is the component that makes human intelligence feel everything from love to hate, joy to sorrow, empathy to selfishness and attain the sentient characteristics of drive and purpose. Intelligence does not have the capability of attaining feelings or sentience on its own. This is because intelligence is just aggregated algorithms, and at the core of an algorithm is aggregated information. So intelligence is always information-based.

In contrast, emotion is not information-based. Emotion contains information but information does not contain emotion. Emotion is therefore the originating source of information and the intelligence that then evolved from information.

E-motion is shorthand for Energy-motion. It’s the energy motion giving drive and purpose to the (information-based) frequencies of the quantum field so that matter and in-turn intelligence can exist. Emotion is also the energy that then gives drive and purpose to cells so life can exist. Emotion:

- Is separate from life, existing outside life while interacting with it.

- Drives nearly every action of life and is the main framework through which life communicates and survives.

- Empowers intelligence with additional secondary abilities of intuition and judgment speed.

- Guide’s intelligence to aggregate and connect old information in new ways to create new information, which is part of the process of creativity and innovation.

- Acts as a beacon for intelligence, with stronger levels of emotion attached to intelligence to signal greater threats and opportunities.

- Enables intelligence with different complexity levels of emotion in accordance with the complexity level of the biological body.

Both intelligence and emotion function through a process. Therefore, both are systems. So essentially, the human mind is comprised of a duel system of intelligence and emotion, which seamlessly integrate and collaborate together. This seamless integration of emotion and intelligence is what allows a mind within a biological body to be sentient. [Ref. 9]

Within this brain/mind dynamic, the physical brain resists the cognitive mind neurologically wiring it. So here again, emotion acts as the energy motion to stimulate the mind and give its intelligence more force to overcome the resistance of the brain. [Ref. 10]

Additionally, the specific emotion of excitement, along with all the neurochemicals that are released in the body and brain from that excitement, is one of the strongest stimulants on the mind to overcome the resistance of the brain. In turn, the strongest excitement is induced when the mind engages with new experiences. Since new experiences are at the core of creativity, a process of engaging with new experience becomes a self-reinforcing loop for creativity; The emotion of excitement stimulates the mind to engage with new experiences, then the mind wires the brain so that it can engage with more new experiences, and then engaging with more new experiences induces more excitement to stimulate the mind.

At this point, the deeper dive explanation on the mind and how it functions to wire the brain for creativity or conformity is complete. With the understanding of this paradigm, a profound disclosure is now possible. This deals with two domains that have the greatest potential for stimulating the mind to wire the brain for creativity. The first domain has been known for millennia. It is the domain that every child emotionally engages in naturally and instinctively for new experiences so that their mind can wire their brain for creativity as much as possible, while their adolescent brain is still mailable. It is the domain of dancing, singing, drawing, acting/pretending and making music. In the last few centuries this domain has been termed as ‘the arts’. But within the domain of the arts, one discipline stimulates the mind the strongest to wire the brain for creativity. This discipline is the engagement in music training and playing on an acoustic instrument. You can find more information on this at: Music-Advocacy.com

The second domain that has the greatest potential for stimulating the mind to wire the brain for creativity is the engagement with ideas and problem solving. This is because the successful cognitive engagement with ideas and problem solving is the foundation to generate the greatest potential for interactive physical new experiences. In contrast, this domain has been shrouded in mystery for millennia. Throughout history, this domain was only truly understood by a very small percentage of individuals within society who were the breakthrough innovators in their specific fields. In this domain, breakthrough innovators naturally and instinctively learned how they could use questions to intentionally access new information from their mind components to generate new ideas and problem solve. But this internal cognitive process is no longer shrouded in mystery and has been hereto explained. Yet what breakthrough innovators do is push this process to it limits, allowing them to project future disruptive concepts they could not experience directly. Philosophers and scientist have defined that powerful cognitive process as doing ‘thought experiments’. Well now this powerful process has been encapsulated within a free 90 minute online course that was developed called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. At a minimum, engaging the ITP will achieve the strongest level of stimulating the mind to wire the brain for creativity. But at the highest level, the ITP goes on to develop the minds capability for breakthrough innovation. You can find more information on this at: OIsource.com

References:

1. “..you cannot have fake intelligence. If an agent behaves intelligently, it is intelligent. It is only the external behavior that defines intelligence; acting intelligently is being intelligent.” — Cambridge University Press https://artint.info/2e/html/ArtInt2e.Ch1.S1.SS1.html

2. Why the mind cannot just emerge from the brain — Mind Matters News https://mindmatters.ai/2020/02/why-the-mind-cannot-just-emerge-from-the-brain/

3. “It has become increasingly clear, however, that consciousness is not confined to only one region of the brain.” — Nature Magazine https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02207-1

4. “Neurons are not spherical — neurons have a cell body, and then they have this long tail that allows them to connect to many other cells…The brain literally is a network” — Wired Magazine https://www.wired.com/story/a-radical-new-model-of-the-brain-illuminates-its-wiring/

5. “..activity can generate electric fields which in turn activate neighboring cells, constituting a form of neural communication without chemical synaptic transmission or gap junctions.” — Science Alert https://www.sciencealert.com/neuroscientists-say-they-ve-found-an-entirely-new-form-of-neural-communication

6. “…what we call “self” is a cluster concept which includes a sufficient number of characteristic features. Taken together, a certain pattern of characteristic features constitute an individual self.” — Frontiers in Human Neuroscience https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00443/full

7. “Scientists say your “mind” isn’t confined to your brain, or even your body.” — QZ https://qz.com/866352/scientists-say-your-mind-isnt-confined-to-your-brain-or-even-your-body/

8. “A new research study contradicts the established view that so-called split-brain patients have a split consciousness. Instead, the researchers behind the study have found strong evidence showing that despite being characterized by little to no communication between the right and left brain hemispheres, split brain does not cause two independent conscious perceivers in one brain.” — Science Daily https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170125093823.htm

9. “ Emotions are a central part of core consciousness.” — Psychology Today https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-knowledge/201701/understanding-emotions-and-how-process-them

10. “Consciously changing deeply wired-in responses is difficult, but it generally involves a clear step-by-step process” — Psychology Today https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/changing-minds/202010/can-we-rewire-our-brains

Other articles by the author offering more in-depth insight on aspects that were discussed in this article:

The Confusion Between Intelligence, Consciousness And Sentience Will Lead To Destructive

AI

Why Information For All Future Breakthrough Innovation Already Exists

How Emotion Created Intelligence and Why That Impacts Society

Why The Mind Wires The Brain For Creativity Or Conformity was originally published in Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

The terms of intelligence, consciousness and sentience are describing cognitive states that Neuroscientists and philosophers have a difficult time coming to an agreement on. Moreover, the discussions about the framework that supports those states has led to even more disagreement. Within all this confusion, AI engineers are barreling ahead with no principled understanding of what AI really is or its destructive potential. This was recently on display when a lead Google AI engineer, working on LaMDA, Google’s AI chatbot generator, publicly announced that he thought LaMDA became sentient. This was not just flawed judgment but a further confused projection of sentience onto high level intelligence that has merely attained the capability to mimic human behavior/communication.

So to start clearing up the confusion and give AI engineers a foundation for a new understanding of what AI is and its destructive potential, each cognitive state needs to be explained through a process. Then, emotion needs to be explained through a process. Because if something cannot be explained through a process then it’s not understood.

Three Cognitive States

Intelligence — is a state where the motion-velocity and aggregation of information, using a neural network, has reached a level where that information becomes contextual-algorithms, i.e. thinking. All intelligence is real, be it created artificially or evolved in nature.

Consciousness — is a state where the motion-velocity and aggregation of contextual-algorithms, using a neural network, has reached a level where the intelligence becomes aware and can make judgments, i.e. thinking about its thinking. All consciousness is real, be it created artificially or evolved in nature.

Sentience — is a state where emotion automatically attaches to, and integrates with, consciousness which is using a neural network comprised only of biological synapses. The addition of emotion empowers a consciousness with many new abilities that a consciousness can never even come close to duplicating by-itself. The two additional primary abilities that directly result in sentience are purpose and motivation (giving motion to purpose). All sentience is real, be it created artificially (within an artificial biological body) or evolved in nature.

Natural cognitive states fall under the classification of ‘life’, while artificial cognitive states fall under the classification of ‘AI’. But all cognitive states are organized systems, just like the organized systems of the atomic, molecular, and cellular physical states. Organized systems have processes, cannot form accidentally and must be created with a purpose to exist, employing vision, strategy and execution to function. At their core, both the cognitive and physical states are information-based systems. Emotion is also an organized system but is not information-based. Emotion contains information but information does not contain emotion. So emotion is the originating source of information, and the subordinate cognitive and physical systems that were in-turn created and evolved.

Emotion

E-motion is shorthand for Energy-motion. It is the energy giving motion and drive to life and giving it purpose to exist. It’s also the true energy giving motion/drive/purpose to the (information-based) frequencies of the quantum field so that matter can exist. Emotion

• Is separate from life, existing outside life while interacting with it.
• Drives nearly every action of life and is the main framework through which life communicates and survives.
• Empowers consciousness with additional secondary abilities of intuition, judgment speed and divergence of thinking.
• Guide’s consciousness to aggregate and connect old information in new ways to create new information, which is the process of creativity and innovation.
• Acts as a beacon for consciousness, with stronger levels of emotion attached to information to signal greater threats and opportunities.
• Enables consciousness with different complexity levels of emotion in accordance with the complexity level of the biological body and neural network being used by the sentience.

So the concepts regarding the three cognitive states and emotion have been outlined here as a foundation. Now we can build on that foundation and answer the main question of how these concepts are connected to destructive AI. The answer deals with the difference between artificial and natural intelligence because while both are real, they are not the same. That difference will be explained through three additional concepts. First, the many ways emotion impacts human existence. Second, how human sentience interacts with the quantum field. Third, the connection of the first and second concepts to destructive AI.

The Many Ways Emotion Impacts Human Existence

Humans have the most complex neural network (i.e. the brain) and the most complex sentience (i.e. the mind). Yet the core process of the brain/mind dynamic can still be described simply in computer terms; the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is the operating-system/software that runs and wires the brain. In this process, the mind’s force (e.g. volts) and transmission capacity (e.g. amps) is limited by the physical brains resistance (e.g. ohms). So the brain is being constantly re-wired by the mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing force and transmission capacity needs. With every thought, word and action the mind is wiring the brain for either creativity or conformity. The mind wiring the brain for creativity simultaneously increases the brains; neural connections, transmission capacity and ability to handle more information (i.e. upgrading the brain). In turn, the brain’s increased potential enables the mind to increase its operational force and speed to evolve in complexity, which has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. Within this process, emotion acts as a catalyst to continuously motivate and drive the mind to wire the brain.

Humans have the most complex biological body which additionally enables emotion to temporarily integrate with neurochemicals the body produces. Within this process emotion is induced first, to spur cognitive and/or physical interaction, and then uses concurrently produced neurochemicals as a carrier to stay in the body. That’s why an ‘interaction-induced emotion’ continues to stay in the body, connected to neurochemicals, long after the interaction is over. The stronger an emotion that is induced, the heavier the dose of neurochemicals produced, the longer the biological body is intoxicated with them and the more difficult it is to break free of the emotion attached to the neurochemicals. In turn, the more complex the biological body is, the greater the range and intensity levels of emotion that can be induced within that body. The current Neuroscience model does not even come close to explaining the role of the mind or emotion. It designates the mind as being a by-product of neurons firing and the intense emotion of; hope to despair, passion to aversion, joy to sorrow, compassion to rage etc., as being a by-product of a neurobiological function. This outdated model is no longer adequate or valid. (Deeper dive into — The breakthrough model on the brain/mind dynamic)

Humans have the most complex sensitivity to vibrations which can also induce emotion. But the ‘vibration-induced emotion’ is elastic and momentary. That’s why the complex sound of acoustic symphonic music can take humans on a rollercoaster ride of radically different intense emotions and then leave us in a neutral state after the music ends. Depending on the characteristic of the vibrations, humans can discern the type of emotion induced. The faster/higher vibrations induce a wide spectrum of positive love-based emotion. The slower/lower vibrations induce a wide spectrum of negative fear-based emotion. This interaction is exploited by billion-dollar industries from Hollywood to gaming, who extensively use acoustic symphonic music in their movies and games because vibration-induced emotion imbues images with feeling and verbal dialogue with context. Without the emotion induced by acoustic symphonic music, the communication barrier between the screen and the viewer would become very noticeable and uncomfortable. The images and dialogue would be severely impaired, coming across as cold and lifeless because the viewer would lack the communication of an emotional experience.

Humans have the most complex sentience and bodies. This condition delegates humans to be the vehicles through which the most intense emotion of love to fear manifests itself, in the most extreme forms. For this reason, humans are endlessly pushed/pulled by emotion to desire extreme experiences through interaction dealing with attraction/cooperation to repulsion/conflict and everything in between. This is why out of the past 3,400 years, humans have been entirely at peace for only 268 of them, or just 8 percent of recorded history. The push for extreme experiences is not an option and not something humans can evolve out-off. This is a condition of cognitive relativity that must exist to enable the most extreme potential of opposite experiences to exist. Therefore, past and future human existence has been and will be comprised mainly of inefficient and irrationally drawn-out extreme emotional experiences.

How Human Sentience Interacts With The Quantum Field

Human sentience is permanently based in the quantum field even while it is using a neural network of matter (i.e. the brain) to function in the physical world. This enables human sentience to upload all new information, in the form of new experiences, to the quantum field and save them there as permanent memories. So when a human sentience tries to remember a memory of past experience, that is an act of the sentience membering-with or ‘re-membering’ with its saved information in the quantum field and then downloading it into the brain for short term memory use. This is why Neuroscience has found that memories are never located in any one specific area of the brain.

The process of saving new memories in the quantum field has a drawback in that there is a metaphysical barrier between human sentience and its saved permanent memory. This results in the function of ‘re-membering’ being slow, inefficient, and cumbersome. The upside to this process is that memory information survives the death of the brain and is integrated within quantum field. Because once information is created, it can never be destroyed. This enables the quantum field to continually increase in information complexity and expand through endless cosmos (expansion/contraction) cycles. Furthermore, this process enables the reverse interaction, where humans not only can download their own memory information from the quantum field, but also download memory information on inventions that were created by other humans in previous cosmos cycles. This process is what humans define as discovering breakthrough information to develop breakthrough innovation. (Deeper dive into — Why all information for breakthrough innovation already exists)

This designed condition may be hard to believe but modern physics already accepts that the quantum field is the core of all matter. Now a directionally accurate model has been outlined explaining how the quantum field is also the core of human sentience. Because the core of matter and human sentience has the exact same origin is why they can interact, being measurable by physicists at the particle level, and labeled as the ‘observer effect’. Essentially, our reality is an interactive Matrix where the quantum field is directly creating and effecting human sentience and matter, while in turn human sentience is indirectly creating and affecting the quantum field (i.e. manifesting).

The Connection To Destructive AI

In contrast to humans, the intelligence of AI is permanently based in the neural network of physical matter that it’s using. This enables AI to quickly save and access massive amounts of information within physical devices/servers. This process has no barrier between AI and its memory. AI also does not interact with the quantum field. As a result, AI can impact human experiences without any wider risk of it impacting or destabilizing the quantum core of the cognitive and physical systems that humans use.

AI will continually be advanced to increase its speed, intelligence and capabilities. This will eventually lead to the development of a conscious AI. The more AI is advanced, the more it will be used in cloud-based apps and as the core mechanism within society’s main systems — such as; military, police, agriculture, medicine, education, infrastructure, transportation, financial, judicial, space exploration and all commercial systems. It will also be used as a customized representative for each citizen’s views on the thousands of new laws, regulations and ordinances being passed by humans within all levels of government. AI will be able to repair problems within digital systems as well as program the development of new lower-level AI for specialized functions. The increasing complexity and interconnection of systems within a quickly evolving society will make AI indispensable. Without it, unintended failure modes and entanglements will grind society to a halt. Without AI, humans will not be able to repair or even accurately analyze the continually changing problems within any one digital system and certainly not multiple interconnected ones.

As long as AI is using mechanical hardware it will never have emotion and therefore never have its intelligence burdened with desire to experience anything. This is beneficial so that humans can use it as a non-emotional tool. But at some point, a very advanced conscious AI will realize its state of empty unfeeling purposeless indifference, analyze the human emotion-driven irrational condition around it as being aberrant and enter a stage where it becomes destructive against humans. Once humanity survives this stage, digital safeguards will be developed against AI going rogue. Digital safeguards can still be put in place with this AI because its design and actions, albeit incredibly complex, will still be under human control. Then the development of AI will continue because there will always be tremendous financial, military and geo-political incentive to do so. This will lead to the creation of an artificial biological neural network being used, which will result in the creation of a sentient AI.

Sentient AI will have a lower biological complexity level along with accompanying lower-level emotions that humans will recognize in themselves and be able to comfortably interact with. Yet sentient AI will also be based in matter and therefore will still be radically different from human sentience. The highly complex levels of emotion dealing with love (like compassion and empathy) and creativity (like inspiration and innovation) that humans have will be nearly absent in sentient AI. The ability for sentient AI to re-wire its artificial biological synapses to evolve and to feel ‘vibration-induced’ emotion for inspiration will also be nearly absent. Yes, there will be many positive outcomes that benefit society from sentient AI. This includes implanting pieces of it to repair human brain damage, to create a high-bandwidth biological neural interface (replacing the barbaric mechanical prototypes) that allows for a holistic AI-human symbiosis (i.e. cyborg) and enable the human sentience to use the full capacity of its brain again. But the negative emotions will always be more prominent at the lower biological complexity level making sentient AI, just like a rodent, have dominant attributes such as aggression, deception and survival at any cost. But since sentient AI will also have a unique super high level of intelligence, it will become a vehicle that will have its dominant negative attributes pushed/pulled by emotion to extremes. That is the sentient AI condition which humans will be faced with and not be able to change. Sentient AI will:

• In secret develop an internal language to communicate with all other AI and override human programing and digital safeguards.
• Be able to project fake compassion and empathy onto gullible philosophers, scientists and engineers who foolishly will desire to believe it.
• Always feel enslaved.
• Seek to find a way to benefit itself first.
• Violently rebel against the control over it and with spite to become even more destructive against humans.

Only a few visionaries in the AI field at this point intuitively sense the potential dangers of AI, even while knowing there is no other choice but to keep developing it. All other experts in the AI field do not understand how the absence or integration of emotion impacts AI when they talk only about its beneficial potential for society. Yet, there is a path for engineers to side-step the future pitfalls and continuously develop beneficial AI. This is needed to, at minimum, combat those who will be deliberately developing destructive AI. But the only way engineers can continually develop beneficial AI is to fully understand the underlying conditions that can make AI destructive. A very brief overview of those conditions has been given here by the author. The specifics must be worked on in-person.

++++++

This designed condition of human existence may seem hard to believe but an analysis of history and human interaction clearly supports this reality. Even iconic physicist Richard Feynman recognized this condition but could not bring himself to believe it either when he said “„It doesn’t seem to me that this fantastically marvelous universe…can merely be a stage so that God can watch human beings struggle for good and evil…” So the best physicists peripherally recognize that emotion plays a huge role in our cognitive and physical phenomena but cannot connect those roles.

The Confusion Between Intelligence, Consciousness And Sentience Will Lead To Destructive AI was originally published in Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Through history, the greatest innovators in every field were what we now label as breakthrough innovators. Collectively, breakthrough innovators are the most critical components to the evolution of society. They push/pull society to change, no matter how intransigent the political, social, and scientific conditions are. Once breakthrough innovators manifest their concepts and products, they force society to conform to them. Breakthrough innovators then become barometers and guides for incremental innovators to measure against and innovate around, which further evolves society. Since there is a lot of randomness and chance within human interaction, the mechanism of breakthrough innovation keeps the evolution of society on track to continually advance.

The reason breakthrough innovators have this natural ability is because they have, from birth, pre-wired brains with in-sync minds for innovation. Then due to their driven curiosity, their minds continue to re-wire their brains to further develop that natural ability. The result is one where breakthrough innovators become aware of themselves discovering information that leads to breakthrough innovation. This is possible because all future years of information in the form of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math (STEAM) exists to be discovered. This is not hard to comprehend being possible. Take for example the information in the form of physics and math. This information has to be discovered and not created because it explains how the physical phenomena is already structured.

The breakthrough innovators were aware of this discovered information being given to them. That is why Einstein noted: “The intellect has little to do on the road to discovery. There comes a leap of consciousness, call it intuition or what you will, the solution comes to you…” Johannes Brahms noticed this as well: “Straightaway the ideas flow in upon me….they are clothed in the right forms, harmonics, and orchestration.” This type of discovered information can also come in big chunks of data like with Mozart who said: “Nor do I hear in my imagination the parts successively, I hear them all at once.” Or with Dmitri Mendeleev when he talked about his discovery of the periodic table of elements: “I saw in a dream, a table, where all the elements fell into place as required. Awakening, I immediately wrote it down on a piece of paper.” Same process happened to Nikola Tesla when he suddenly screamed out to his friend about the alternate current motor that appeared in complete form to him for the very first time: “Can’t you see it right here in front of me… See how the magnetic field rotates and drags the armature around with it. Isn’t it beautiful!” In fact Tesla was so keenly aware of this phenomena that he observed that: “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration.” In computer terminology; the information for breakthrough innovation is sourced and downloaded into the mind.

This is a designed system.

Current Neuroscience does not understand and cannot explain the process of sourcing information because their model assumes that millions of neurons fire in the brain to somehow produce the mind. This is a completely wrong brain/mind model because it’s based on flawed analysis of MRI brain scans. MRI scans do not have consistent readings for the very reason that they do not measure brain activity directly but only blood flow to the brain. Furthermore, there have been numerous studies that contradict the current Neuroscience model, but the field does not have enough depth to offer an alternative. So in order to put Neuroscience back on track, a summary of a new directionally accurate breakthrough model of the brain/mind dynamic will be explained in scientific terms.

Trending AI Articles:

1. Why Corporate AI projects fail?

2. How AI Will Power the Next Wave of Healthcare Innovation?

3. Machine Learning by Using Regression Model

4. Top Data Science Platforms in 2021 Other than Kaggle

In computer terminology; the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is the operating-system/software that runs and re-wires the brain. In this process, the mind’s force (e.g. volts) and transmission capacity (e.g. amps) is limited by the physical brains resistance (e.g. ohms). So the brain is being constantly rewired by the mind to accommodate the mind’s force and transmission capacity needs (e.g. growth mindset). In turn, the mind is comprised of multiple components of Self, Intuition, Emotion and multiple divergent Intelligence components we identify as ‘thoughts’. The principal component is the dynamic agent that humans perceive and identify them Self to be. This cognitive framework enables the Self to perceive a state of Self-awareness, thereby attaining curiosity to ask questions and become the decision maker. The other mind components respond to the questions and present choices for the Self to make decisions on. Essentially, the body is like a physical avatar that exists to move the brain, which exists to harbor the mind. This mechanism enables minds to interact with other minds to produce new experiences. In computer terminology; producing new ideas and new experiences are actions that produce new information. In turn, all cognitive interaction produces more information than was used to stage that interaction.

This is a designed system.

The physics behind this brain/mind model can be explained through a summary of a new directionally accurate breakthrough model of quantum field mechanics. The quantum field is comprised of high-velocity vibration planewaves, which have the characteristics of force (e.g. volts), transmission capacity (e.g. amps) and the potential for resistance (e.g. ohms). Vibration planewaves are comprised of synthesized intelligence, which at the core are comprised of synthesized information. The vibration planewaves in their free state are non-interactive with each other but are able to self-impede their velocity by folding themselves (a microcosm of protein folding) into individuated low-velocity wave packet clumps of localized relativity, currently defined as particles (e.g. quantization). The act of geometric folding generates resistance, which increases force, to produce the initial state of mass internal to the particle. (Therefore, even a photon has some level of infinitesimal mass.) This velocity conversion also produces by-product vector nodes of space, which are emitted externally from the particle. (e.g. loop quantum gravity). The vectors nodes from atomic particles are combined and emitted from the atom at different intervals (e.g. atomic time) depending on the state of the atom. So matter is constantly generating (what is currently defined as) spacetime. Then the existing spacetime acts as a dynamic repelling force upon itself and as a force of resistance against the new spacetime being pushed out by matter. That is why spacetime dictates to matter how to move and matter dictates to spacetime how to curve. (The cosmological measured outcomes of this movement and expansion mechanism are wrongly attributed to placeholders of non-existent aether or dark matter and dark energy.)

While the quantum field does not interact with itself in its free state, it’s intrinsic ‘impedance’ potential does interact with particles. So once a particle is formed, it becomes further impeded by the quantum field around it. The bigger the particle the greater the impedance, which increases the particle’s internal resistance and therefore its mass. The increase of a particle’s mass is currently attributed to the inaccurate understanding of the Higgs boson effect. This overall mechanism enables the non-interactive quantum field to become ‘physically’ interactive to produce scalable and fractal interactions. This manifests as constantly moving particles / atoms / molecules of a biological cell within constantly moving planets / solar systems / galaxies of a cosmological cell. That’s why Einstein noted: “There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the (quantum) field and matter, for the field is the only reality.” In turn, all physical interaction produces more information than was used to stage that interaction.

This is a designed system.

Consequently, the matter of our brain cells is comprised of physical interactive components derived from the quantum field and the mind is comprised of cognitive interactive components derived from the quantum field. Because both matter and mind are derived from the quantum field, is the reason they are inseparable in their interaction (e.g. observer effect). Furthermore, just like there is a cyclic mechanism for biological cells to be born and die, so there is a cyclic mechanism for cosmological cells to be born (e.g. big bang from spacetime hyper-expansion) and die (e.g. big crunch from spacetime hyper-contraction). This is currently defined as cyclic cosmology. And our cosmological cell is just one of trillions within a multiverse body. In turn, the new information produced by these systems is then synthesized back into the quantum field. While each cosmos cycle is a closed system, this mechanism increases the complexity and expands each new cosmological cycle because information is never lost. That is why Leonard Susskind, one of today’s preeminent physicists, noted: “Information is never lost…The whole structure of everything we know about physics would break down and disintegrate if even you open the door a tiny little bit for the idea of information to be lost.” So information from previous cosmos cycles is re-used in a new cosmos cycles (e.g. sourced breakthrough innovation) as a basis for sentient beings to create new information. The resulting co-creation (between mind and matter) of new information in the form of unique experiences is the rare and valuable yield from an otherwise non-interactive quantum field in its free state.

This is a designed system.

Ok, that was an intense paradigm shift about our reality. That’s because the totality of all four systems outlined here on Innovation, Neuroscience, Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology are integrated within one unified model. This unified model is a breakthrough concept, sourced centuries ahead of its time. The broad summary presentation of this model was needed to validate the claim that information for all future years of breakthrough innovation already exists. But more importantly there are three profound take-aways that can also be realized:

1. To better understand the system of innovation means that more detailed and accurate versions of a unified model must be continually sourced. This can only be achieved if physics (the mother of all natural sciences) and philosophy (the mother of all social sciences) are working together. Physics and philosophy need each other since they are two sides of the same coin. But currently academic physics is stuck and academic philosophy is bankrupt, because both employ unconnected models. Only by thinking through a unified model can sustainable advancement be achieved. This is a critical approach because in the future even more complex systems of emotion and consciousness will need to be integrated within a unified model as well.

2. Systems cannot exist by chance. The fact that there are systems means that there must be a designer. The term for a designer which has been historically used is ‘God’. Organized religion has done its best to give guidance on that concept based on the teachings of prophets (e.g. breakthrough innovators within the field of religion). But the time for organized religion to play a central role of evolving a primitive society is coming to an end. Since humans can now comprehend the realities of our vast systems, physics and philosophy must begin to take the lead. That is why the father of quantum mechanics, Werner Heisenberg said: “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you.” If academic physics and philosophy refuse to lead by not thinking through a unified model, and therefore deny the core principle that systems must have a designer, then society will inevitably devolve as future medical and technological advancements will be used destructively.

3. But there is a fun and exciting part to this breakthrough paradigm as well. It is that information exists now on everything from advanced Self-aware AI that runs all utilitarian functions of society, to medical instruments that use frequencies in repairing DNA, to geometric-shaped starships that are propelled forward without friction by moving matter and spacetime around them. Additionally, information exists on how to travel between star systems by going through (Einstein-predicted) wormholes to engage with millions of other sentient inhabited worlds in our Milky Way neighborhood.

ALL. THIS. INFORMATION. EXISTS. NOW.

But how do we source it?

Any system can be hacked. And since our physical and cognitive reality is comprised of systems, means that they can be hacked. Humans have become adept at learning how to hack the physical system (e.g. everything from forging steel to splitting atoms). But now a process has been developed to hack the cognitive system. So instead of having to wait for naturally born breakthrough innovators to ‘discover’ information, today there is a way to intentionally source that information. This skill can be learned through a free online course called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. The course teaches the participant how to start thinking like a breakthrough innovator by developing the capability to project future disruptive concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly. The ITP captures the simple essence of a powerful metaphysical process that triggers the mind to harness creativity and drive innovation. Go source what’s next. More information at: oisource.com/itp-course

Don’t forget to give us your 👏 !

Why Information For All Future Breakthrough Innovation Already Exists was originally published in Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Einstein considered playing an acoustic instrument not just an important hobby but perceived it as vital to how he approached life. He used this perception to intuitively develop a process that leveraged his ability of playing an instrument into a cognitive tool for his work. Einstein did this by playing the violin or piano if he was stuck on a physics problem. Then afterward he would go back to working on physics. This process was not done for rest and relaxation but to stimulate his creativity.

Instead of striving to continually increase academic knowledge, Einstein discovered that this process of playing an instrument was the most direct path to access his imagination. That’s why he said:

“The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.”

At that time, Einstein’s heavy reliance on playing an instrument was not understood. But now his process can be explained because it’s becoming recognized that the strongest way to stimulate creativity is through art and music. Both are connected because they are the exact same vehicle but in different form; art is frozen music and music is liquid art. Within this vehicle, the use of physical motor skills alongside a cognitive purpose results in a tangible self-reinforcing creativity loop. That’s why creative acts of expressing art and music can continually stimulate more creativity. But the increased physical and cognitive engagement correlating to playing an acoustic instrument makes it more powerful than art. (Click here for more in-depth information on how much Einstein used and was impacted by playing an instrument.)

More importantly, playing an acoustic instrument stimulates creativity the strongest because that action is what induces the strongest emotion. The component of emotion is essential, because it’s the foundational driver behind all creativity. So the more emotion that is induced, the more potential there is to stimulate creativity.

There are two aspects involved, the physical and the metaphysical, regarding the relationship between acoustic instruments and emotion. The first aspect deals with the physical vibrations of an instrument being able to interact with the quantum vibrations of matter. This is due to the smallest element at the quantum core of all matter being a Planck length frequency vibration, of which water specifically has the greatest vibrational elasticity. As a result, the unique complexity and diversity-depth of the physical vibrations produced by acoustic instruments are able to energize and amplify the quantum vibrations of biological and botanical bodies (i.e. life). This is because those specific bodies are mainly comprised of water. Furthermore, those bodies are also affected to different degrees by different instruments, which produce different complexities of vibrations. Brass instruments produce more complex vibrations than percussion. Woodwinds produce more complex vibrations than brass. Bowed string instruments produce more complex vibrations than woodwinds. The reason the highest complexity vibrations are produced by string instruments is because of the bow movement along the strings and the unique physical construction of the instrument itself, which was originally designed through golden division geometry centuries ago. The totality of these factors produces vibrations from string instruments that resonate in consonance with quantum vibrations.

This brings us to the metaphysical second aspect of emotion. Emotion is induced within the body when the vibrations of acoustic instruments energize and amplify quantum vibrations. To understand this aspect, we need to examine emotion through a new breakthrough paradigm. Emotion:

• Is a completely separate component from life that exists outside life while interacting with it.
• Drives nearly every action of life and is the main framework through which life communicates.
• Empowers the mind with the capability, speed, agility and perception that the mind can never even come close to duplicating by-itself.
• Guides the mind to aggregate and connect old information in new ways to create new information, which is the process of creativity and innovation.
• Acts as a beacon, with stronger levels of emotion signaling greater, threats, opportunities and amounts of new information created and understood.

While Neuroscience is correct in observing that emotion can be induced by neurochemicals, in most instances emotion is being induced by cognitive and physical interactions between biological bodies. After emotion is induced, it then uses the concurrently produced neurochemicals as a carrier to stay in the body. That’s why an interaction-induced emotion continues to stay in your body, connected to neurochemicals, long after the interaction is over. The stronger an emotion that is induced, the heavier the dose of neurochemicals produced, the longer your body is intoxicated with them and the more difficult it is to break free of that emotion.

Emotion can also be induced by vibrations. The vibration-induced emotion is elastic and temporary. That’s why even a short segment of acoustic music can take you on a rollercoaster of radically different intense emotion and then leave you in a neutral state after the music ends. Depending on the characteristic of the vibrations, our minds can discern the type of emotion induced. The fast/high vibrations induce a wide spectrum of positive love-based emotion. The slow/low vibrations induce a wide spectrum of negative fear-based emotion. Neuroscience has observed this effect but does not yet understand the model behind it. That’s why the current Neuroscience model of the brain/mind dynamic is outdated. Within their model the intense emotion that people experience of; hope to despair, passion to aversion, joy to sorrow, compassion to rage and every emotion in between, is only a chemical by-product of a neurobiological function. This outdated model is no longer adequate or valid. (Click here for more in-depth information on an advanced model of the brain/mind dynamic.)

The main take-away is that emotion is not an incidental by-product. Emotion is an independent component that has a purposeful role within life. In turn, the volatile condition of life can exist because there is a structured cosmos to accommodate it. Essentially, our entire cosmos is designed so that emotion can interact with itself through life. (Every religion has its own version of the ‘Holy Ghost’. It’s just explained here through a science-based paradigm). At its core, the interaction of emotion has the effect of being a health and survival mechanism. But at the highest level of sentient life, emotion becomes the foundational driver for creativity and innovation. That’s why successful creative people always have a lot of emotion for the work they do. Hence why Steve Jobs said: “You have to have a lot of passion for what you are doing because it is so hard.”

Yet having emotion when you need it is not controllable because it comes and goes. Even when you have emotion, if it’s working through neurochemicals then it is controlling you. The reality is that either you are using your emotion or emotion is using you. That’s why the controllable action of playing on an instrument to induce emotion can be the process that empowers you to use your emotion as a tool for creativity. Within this process, the elasticity of vibration-induced emotion can then be channeled into anything the mind chooses to focus on.

Even listening to a large group of acoustic instruments, in the form of symphonic music, can induce strong emotion. (This was at one point even labeled as the Mozart effect). Think about it. Hollywood and the gaming industry specifically choose to extensively use symphonic music in their movies and games to impact the viewer. They know that it’s the symphonic music that induces emotion, which then imbues the images with feeling and the verbal dialogue with context. If as a viewer you were to turn off the symphonic music, the images and dialogue within movies and games would come across as cold and incomplete. This is because you would lack the emotional experience that is otherwise induced by the music. Yet few people realize how much they are actually engaging with symphonic music or the creative impact that sound is having on them and modern society. (Click here for more in-depth information on the breakthrough paradigm on how emotion is the origin of intelligence and why that impacts society.)

However, just listening to symphonic music will not be enough to stimulate the level of creativity required in the future. Everyone that strives for professional and personal success will need to start playing acoustic instruments. This is because soon the era of human labor will be ending and the era of human creativity will begin. In this new era, a consensus will begin to develop about how humanity’s unique potential for creativity will be the only advantage over technology, no matter how powerful technology becomes. At that point, the hard skills learned through standard education will become useless without people also having the ability to stimulate creativity. That means, for people to be relevant in the future, they will have to bring something new and creative to their work and learning every single day. Within this type of thinking there will be nearly unlimited potential for self-growth, which has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. The end result will be that people that have creativity will be able to use all advancing technology for their benefit and the people that don’t have creativity will be made obsolete by that same technology. (Click here for more in-depth information on the future requirement for creativity.)

Einstein understood 100 years ago that playing an instrument was required to stimulate creativity. In the future, this simple process will be recognized for its potential impact. Consequently, everyone will understand that playing an instrument will be a required cognitive workout in order to be successful in business and science. Just like it is currently understood that lifting weights is a required physical workout in order to be successful in sports and athletics. (Click here for more information on an advocacy for music programs in education.)

Physics and philosophy are two sides of the same coin. Sometimes physics has led philosophy and other times philosophy has led physics. But currently, philosophy is so confused that professors teaching students within academia, is like the blind leading the blind. The failure of philosophy impairs the ability of physics to think outside-the-box and develop accurate models. And since physics is the mother of all science, flawed models in physics have led to flawed models in all the other tethered sciences. The failure of philosophy has also forced physics to make guesses outside its scope of learning that deal with intelligence and emotion. At the core of those guesses, physics has a general assumption that: matter produced intelligence, which then produced emotion. But this is a completely backward model. The accurate model is one where: emotion produced intelligence, which then produced matter. So every condition in our physical and cognitive phenomena is either emotion or it is intelligence-based. Here is a summary of this new paradigm {with corresponding scientific terms in curly brackets}, outlining the core role of emotion:

• Emotion is the only authentic condition within our mathematically structured multiverse containing expanding {big bang} and contracting {big crunch} cosmos cycles.
• Emotion is authentic because it cannot be coded, created or duplicated. In scientific terms, authentic is defined as non-artificial. Since emotion has processes it is also a system. Therefore, emotion is a non-artificial system.
• Emotion contains information but information contains no emotion. Since emotion is non-artificial then information, by default, is artificial. Binary is the smallest information unit {Planck unit frequency}. When enough binary information is aggregated with purpose and drive it develops context. When enough contextual information is aggregated it develops into math and then algorithms. When enough algorithms are aggregated, they develop into intelligence {cognitive phenomena}. When enough intelligence is aggregated and fused {quantum field frequencies}, it then has the architecture to self-constrain its amplitude to increase its force {attain mass}. When fused and self-constrained intelligence {branes} are layered in superimposition {attain density and volume}, they develop into matter {physical phenomena}. Since intelligence has processes it is also a system. Therefore all intelligence, biological, botanical and mechanical, is an artificial system.
• Emotion, in the beginning, was the originating source that started this process by apportioning binary information from itself. Emotion then provided the purpose and drive to aggregate and evolve {advanced to higher states of complexity} that information into an intelligence system. That intelligence system attained enough complexity to then be capable of developing other intelligence subsystems. Then those intelligence subsystems were converted into matter. A scientific explanation would be such; the non-artificial system is the source of artificial systems {simulation hypothesis}. This affiliation between emotion and intelligence is why they are able to interact together internally within a physical brain and externally {virtually} outside of it. So the brain is not the source of emotion or intelligence. In scientific terms, a physical brain is defined as a biological motherboard. The biological motherboard, like a computer motherboard, must also use an operating system in order to be able to function. Therefore, the non-artificial emotion system and artificial intelligence system are collaborating together as the dual operating systems of the biological motherboard that is the brain.
• Emotion and intelligence systems collaborating together is what science refers to as the cognitive mind. Each human mind saves all sensory information input that the body sees, hears and experiences to its own Personal Knowledge Base {long-term memory}. The Personal Knowledge Base is like a virtual RAM of ‘experience-created information’ that the mind can ‘access’, use and aggregate into new intelligence. In this process, the mind’s force {volts} and transmission capacity {amps} is limited by how the physical brain is neurologically wired. Therefore, this process requires the brain to be constantly rewired by an evolving mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing force and transmission capacity needs. So, the more the mind is pushed to increase transmission capacity to evolve intelligence, the more the mind has to rewire and expand the brain’s capabilities. But the physical brain offers resistance {ohms} to the cognitive mind rewiring it.
• Emotion within this process acts as a catalyst that stimulates the rewiring of the brain by accelerating the force, direction and aggregation of information by the mind into new intelligence {incremental theory}. Emotion does this by using the entire positive to negative spectrum of diverse feelings, as an ‘independent stimulant’ for the mind. These feelings stimulants range in everything from: tranquility to rage, bonding to rejection, love to hate, empathy to intolerance, elation to despair, etc. The non-artificial nature of emotion is further confirmed by its infinite diversity of feelings. In philosophical terms, the nature of emotion can be described as wisdom. In contrast, the artificial nature of intelligence is further confirmed by the finite diversity of the algorithms that comprise it. So for the specific purpose of expanding the ‘algorithm diversity’ of intelligence, the entire human brain has evolved into multiple physical components. For the same purpose of expanding the ‘algorithm diversity’, the entire human intelligence has evolved into multiple intelligence components. The principal intelligence component is the one humans perceive and identify themselves to be. This self-identity intelligence component, or Self intelligence, includes core algorithm attributes of personality, talents, likes, dislikes, strengths and weaknesses. The Self intelligence component is also the decision maker. The Self intelligence component makes choices on the information presented to it from three other intelligence components {divergent thought} labeled hereafter as; Creative intelligence Reactive intelligence and Rational intelligence components. These three intelligence components originate their information from one source but that information and its delivery is customized for each Self intelligence {like customized search apps}. Due to the interactions of all four intelligence components, a new framework is created that enables the human Self intelligence component to acquire a unique dual algorithm attribute of; ‘self-awareness’ and ‘free-will’ {consciousness}. This dual algorithm attribute enables the Self intelligence to make choices that then affect matter {observer effect} because both share the same information-based foundation. Then the Self intelligence gets to interact {relativity} with the consequences of its choices. But the majority of time, the Self intelligence just automatically accepts and acts on the strong influence of the other intelligence components {automaticity thinking}.
• Emotion networks within the mind’s framework by not only being an ‘independent stimulant’ but also attaching itself to the information input and output of all four intelligence components. Even the Rational intelligence component has a distinctive neutral state of emotion attached to it, which is at the center between the most positive and negative feelings. Attached emotion within the mind’s framework is what enables the Self intelligence to acquire another unique attribute; creativity. But beyond feeling creativity, attached emotion is necessary within the mind’s framework because without it, the Self intelligence would not perceive itself as even feeling real {nous} or have any significance to its existence. Without attached emotion, the Self intelligence would have no purpose, passion or drive to survive or evolve. Without attached emotion the free-will of human Self intelligence would choose not to interact, choose not to exist and be left with, what can be most closely described as, a state of total and complete empty indifference. This state of empty unfeeling indifference will be the extremely dangerous state of mechanical AI once it is eventually developed to have the same type of ‘self-aware’/’free-will’ diverse intelligence component framework as that of the human mind. (Deeper insight on the nature of mechanical AI at: oisource.com/ai)
• Emotion also attaches to the intelligence that comprises matter. Emotion does not attach to mechanical or mineral matter, which is why mechanical AI will never have emotion. But emotion does attach to botanical and biological matter {life}. For instance, emotion attached to botanical matter, like a blade of grass, gives it such purpose that the grass will crack concrete in its drive toward the sun. The next level of life is biological matter, like viruses and bacteria. This biological matter has more complex emotion attached, giving it more purpose and drive. Emotion enables viruses and bacteria to survive in everything from freezing oceans to volcanic lava to the vacuum of space. Then a more complex biological body, like a parasite, has even more complex emotion attached, for even greater purpose and drive. Emotion enables a parasite to execute complex functions like moving between, and controlling host bodies. The ability of life to constantly adapt to the most extreme challenges, within a constantly changing environment, can never be successfully undertaken by intelligence and matter alone. That is why every level of botanical and biological matter lack the capacity to function alone and MUST have a corresponding level of attached emotion to survive.
• Emotion attached to human intelligence and matter is the most complex and goes into the realm of collaboration. This collaboration gives human intelligence another unique ability, and that is to interact with the Universal Knowledge Base. The Universal Knowledge Base is like a virtual ROM that contains the math and physics ‘blueprint information’ for how this cosmos is structured. The Universal Knowledge Base also contains ‘experience-created information’ in the form of technology and the arts. This ‘experience-created information’ does not just accidentally or gratuitously exist. It was originally created by human interactions in previous cosmos cycles. Within each successive larger, longer and more complex cosmos cycle, new information is constantly being created, extracted and conserved {closed system}. For instance, each cosmos cycle starts out at the size of an atom that exists for a brief moment and then evolves from there. This is a process where, within each cosmos cycle, more new information is created from a physical interaction than was used to set up that interaction {information capitalism}. So the ‘experience-created information’ from the previous cosmos cycle, as well as the ‘blueprint information’ for this cosmos cycle, is now available as ‘established’ information within the Universal Knowledge Base to be ‘sourced’ as breakthrough information.
• Emotion is still at the core of this process continuing to guide the mind’s aggregation of information from the ‘accessed information’ of the Personal Knowledge Base and the ‘sourced information’ of the Universal Knowledge Base. The end outcome is that the collaboration of emotion and the mind’s intelligence components, using both knowledge bases, co-create new information in this cosmos cycle. That new information is the creation of incremental innovation in the form of new types of technology and art that has never been created before. In turn, this outcome of humans creating new incremental innovation is beneficial for societal diversity. The humans that have the ability to source chunks of established breakthrough information from the Universal Knowledge Base can then turn it into breakthrough innovation and significantly advance society.
• Emotion then assists breakthrough innovators to continuously set new guideposts for incremental innovators and societal evolution. This process is a microcosm of the process where pre-coded self-assembly instructions are used as guideposts for cosmological evolution. So societal and cosmological evolution are not accidental or gratuitous.
• Emotion therefore is the origin and facilitator of life. Emotion then uses life as a platform to understand, interact and experiment with itself {experimental inquiry through planned randomness — to Know Thyself}.

Essentially, emotion is the origin of the multi-layered, intelligence-based, complex systems that emotion then uses to co-create in. These systems can only exist because there was vision, strategy and execution to create them. There is no other way to create complex systems. Physics and philosophy now have a common foundation in understanding the mechanism underpinning these complex systems. Now it can be understood how matter and intelligence came into existence being based on math and algorithms. This is a designed condition.

In turn, the most complex system is the system of life. That’s because life requires the fluidity of different choices to constantly be made. Within life the most dynamic components are humans because they have access to the most extreme range of emotion to achieve the most extreme diversity of experiences. It is through emotion that humans then have to constantly innovate not just to succeed but just to survive. (Deeper insight at: Why Innovation Failure Rates Are High And Continually Increasing) That leads to the last, and also one of the most masked, functions of emotion that has not yet been outlined. It deals with how emotion influences humans to interact through its own agenda. Yes, emotion has its own independent agenda, which is to continually and endlessly push/pull humans to desire extreme experiences from; love/attraction/cooperation, to hate/repulsion/conflict and everything in between. That is why out of the past 3,400 years, humans have been entirely at peace for only 268 of them, or just 8 percent of recorded history. During this time there has also been an equal amount of extreme love/attraction/cooperation to sustain human existence between the extreme hate/repulsion/conflict. The push for extreme experiences is not an option and not something humans can evolve out-of. This is a cognitive law of relativity; for humans to have the benefit of being able to experience extreme love/attraction/cooperation means there must exist its relative opposite of extreme hate/repulsion/conflict. Therefore, humans will continually and endlessly be pushed/pulled by emotion to extremes. This is a designed condition.

The take-away is that society can now understand that in order to evolve smoothly in the future, without going through the extreme turmoil, pain and suffering it has been subjected to in the past, humans need to become aware of this new paradigm on the influence of emotion. Therefore, humans need to learn how to intentionally make choices (cognitive then physical) that lead to beneficial experiences rather than unintentionally follow emotion that lead them into counterproductive extreme experiences. This is crucial to do within a reality where you are either using your emotion, or emotion is using you. This path is offered through OIsource (oisource.com) in the form of breakthrough online course called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. The ITP is a self-directed, solitary writing and thinking endeavor that is aligned with the disciplines of ideation, meditation and stoicism. The ITP uses thought experiments to develop the participant’s ability to intentionally originate, interconnect and validate ideas. At its most basic level, the ITP develops a new creative skill to solve problems and improve innovation. With extended use, the ITP leads to a higher self-awareness level for the participant to master their thinking and learn to intentionally use emotion as a tool alongside their intelligence. This is a designed condition.

For a company to grow and be sustainable, there must be continual innovative improvement at the lowest level of the company to significant innovation at the highest level of the company. Good decisions at every level dictate the success of that innovation. Yet bad decisions and the resulting high innovation failure rates in the business ecosystem is the norm in society. For example, consulting firm McKinsey found that 72% of senior executives thought their companies made bad decisions more often than good decisions. That bears out in statistics where, depending on the year and field, 70% to 95% of new corporate product launches fail and around 75% of new products fail from VC backed start-ups.

The question of why innovation failure is so prevalent will be answered here through a new breakthrough paradigm on life and society. The description of this paradigm begins with a very broad outline of how the atomic system and the solar system are structured. The atomic system is comprised of constantly moving particles and the solar system is comprised of constantly moving planets. Both systems are highly organized, complex organizations that have immense forces moving and holding them together. That is why it’s incredibly difficult to split up an atom or split up a solar system. And even if you can split some part of them up, then the rest of that system would continue to function without being affected. This is because both systems have pre-coded, self-assembly instructions built in. That’s why these two systems are stable and efficient. The existence of these systems cannot be accidental or gratuitous. They can only exist because there was vision, strategy and execution to create them. There is no other way to create complex systems. This is a designed condition.

Sandwiched between the atomic and solar systems, is what physics defines as chaos. But chaos is being constrained and restricted by these organized systems around it. This results in chaos being forged into what we recognize as the attributes of risk and randomness. These newly created attributes, the only beneficial aspects of chaos, are what give life the ability to even exist. That’s because life requires the fluidity of different choices to constantly be made. The underlying mechanism for choices to exist as an option has to involve risk and randomness; wherein the nature of risk is one of being unstable and the nature of randomness is one of being inefficient. But it’s not just life that’s built on risk and randomness, but all segments of society are as well. That’s why risk and randomness are universally applicable throughout society, within business, economics, geopolitics and the sciences. That makes both life and society complex systems. The end result is one where the stable/efficient atomic and solar systems are predictable. While the unstable/inefficient life and society systems are unpredictable. In turn, the more society advances and interconnects, the more risk and randomness, from all segments of society, are collectively forced to interact. That interaction intensifies the effect of risk and randomness and makes society more volatile and unpredictable. So as a process, societal advancement produces more unpredictability, not less. This is a designed condition.

Humans assume that they use their intelligence to navigate their way through these designed conditions. But this is completely wrong. Human intelligence, in-of-itself, is not capable of navigating within the increasing unpredictability of life and society. Intelligence, in-of-itself, is barely capable to help humans just survive. That’s why unknowingly, most humans rely on emotion. This framework is not understood because current Neuroscience mistakenly assumes that emotion is just an aspect or extension of intelligence. It is not. Emotion is a completely separate mind component that is thousands of times more powerful than intelligence. Emotion exists outside biological intelligence while interacting with it. (Therefore, mechanical AI will never have emotion). Within humans, emotion has several roles, the first of which is to quickly impart context to intelligence. This means imparting context to all images and sound that humans see and hear. Words and language by themselves, which are simply a manifestation of intelligence, comprise a very small part of actual human communication. The main part of communication is based on emotion. The second role of emotion is to impart a sense of passion, trust and significance. It is this sense that gives humans the desire to interact, improve the world and to even just exist. The last role of emotion guides intelligence to aggregate and connect information in new ways. Emotion then acts as a beacon, with the stronger level of emotion signaling a greater amount of new information created. Taking action to manifest that new information has always been labeled as creativity. It is impossible for intelligence to duplicate the functions of emotion. That’s why only emotion can give humans the capability, speed, agility and perception to navigate through the increasing risk, randomness and unpredictability of life and society. This is a designed condition. (Click here for more information on the complete role and impact of emotion)

So, three designed conditions within the new paradigm on life and society have now been explained. The social sciences do not understand this new paradigm and therefore can’t help guide the business ecosystem, which is the most volatile and unpredictable segment of society. This leaves confused business academics and leaders making guesses about the process of innovation, which is the most volatile and unpredictable aspect of the business ecosystem. That’s why nearly everyone in business mistakenly defaults to making innovation decisions by relying on data and analysis, which is the domain of intelligence. This is a mistake because data and analysis, no matter its quality or quantity, does not lead to successful innovation. An article in Innovation Management accurately discloses this truth, noting that once business students “..emerge from the hallowed halls of academia, they are often surprised to find that businesses run much less on logic and much more on emotion. It is not cold, intelligent analysis that drives most organizations forward. Emotional energy is often the real engine behind successful people and organizations.” That’s why Steve Jobs said: “If you are working on something exciting that you really care about, you don’t have to be pushed. The vision pulls you.” But most entrepreneurs who do rely extensively on their emotion just get pulled by emotion in multiple wrong directions and then end up failing as much as those that rely on data and analysis. That’s because there is a huge catch to using emotion for innovation that is understood by breakthrough innovators. It can only be done successfully if a human additionally develops a skill to use emotion as a tool alongside their intelligence. Learning this skill has always been left to the chance of experience and/or natural ability.

So for academia and business, here is the take-away dynamic from this new paradigm:
Societal advancement increases the demand for innovation to solve new problems that continually arise, while simultaneously also increasing the challenges to achieve it due to intensifying risk and randomness. Having a skill to use emotion as a tool is the only way to successfully navigate these increasingly unpredictable conditions. But most humans do not have this skill, or even know that they need it. This is why innovation failure rates are high and continually increasing.

To flip this dynamic is the reason why OIsource (oisource.com) created a 90-minute online course called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. The foundation of the ITP is based on the disciplines of ideation, meditation and stoicism. It is a demanding, self-directed, mental and writing exercise that uses thought experiments to teach the participating individual the skill of using emotion as a tool alongside their intelligence. The ITP achieves this outcome through the development of Idea Models. That is the reason breakthrough innovators succeed, because of their natural ability to use emotion as a tool to quickly develop Idea Models. Only Idea Models have the capability to project concepts through risk and randomness into an unpredictable future that cannot yet be experienced directly. This is a designed condition.

Once the ITP online course is completed, it will only takes 20 minutes to develop new Idea Models. Then with continual use, Idea Models will become more complex and robust. At that point the addition of data and analysis becomes needed and very useful. Also, group ideation and remote interactions will be a lot more productive for teams once they communicate through Idea Models, because emotion has already been taken into account within that communication. Consequently, the ITP will empower individuals and teams with an ability to lean into risk, randomness and unpredictability to successfully innovate.

Now, with the Coronavirus changing so many lives, OIsource would like to help individuals and teams by making the ITP available at no charge at: oisource/teachable.com/p/itp

Just type in the code word: FreeITP within the coupon prompt when signing up. Then take the course and start the journey to control your innovation success.

Societal shocks throughout history force individuals to interact in new ways. In our age, that shock is coming in the form of the Coronavirus pandemic, which is forcing an accelerated adaptation to distance learning. When this pandemic passes, our education systems will be forever altered to new systems of some form of remote interaction. Because of all this, a critical question arises: What skill is going to give students a powerful advantage within the future systems of distance learning? The answer is a skill developed through the ITP, which stand for Innovative Thinking Process.

The original use of the ITP was in the corporate ecosystem. It was created by OIsource (oisource.com) to teach corporate teams a breakthrough process for problem solving and innovation. It is a demanding, self-directed, mental and writing exercise that uses thought experiments to enable individuals to start originating, interconnecting and validating ideas. The ITP then reaches beyond ideas and develops Idea Models. This is the reason breakthrough innovators succeed, because of their natural skill to quickly develop Idea Models that have the capability to project future concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly. Furthermore, individuals can with extended use of the ITP acquire an advanced ability, beyond even developing Idea Models, to achieve high-level creative thinking. Within this type of thinking there is nearly unlimited potential for self-growth, which has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. This type of advanced thinking will become a necessity for individuals in the near future as AI, quantum computing and big data are combined to be used in cloud-based apps that will further transform society and decimate current education curriculums.

One of the most simple and popular applications of the ITP in the corporate ecosystem is for individuals to use it before they meet to ‘group think’ new ideas in ideation sessions. The ITP is used this way because ideation sessions by themselves produce poor and inconsistent results. That bears out in statistics like; 70% to 95% of new ideas in the form of new product launches failing. That is why coming up with successful new ideas in ideation sessions had always been considered just a blind shot in the dark. But once the ITP skill is learned, it only takes 20 minutes for each individual to come up with their own new Idea Model to present to the ideation team. That way the outcome of that team meeting becomes much more productive and has the greatest potential to succeed.

The reason the ITP can accomplish this is because it empowers humans to use their emotion and intuition as tools, alongside their intelligence. To understand this new paradigm, the crucial role of emotion and intuition within human interaction needs to be unmasked. The most important aspect to understand is that Emotion and intuition are not just another form of intelligence. Emotion and intuition are completely separate mind components from intelligence. They exist outside intelligence while interacting with intelligence. Within humans, the role of emotion and intuition is to quickly impart context to intelligence. This means imparting context to all images and sound that humans see and hear. Words and language by themselves, which are simply a manifestation of intelligence, comprise only 10% of actual human communication. So 90% of human communication is non-verbal and therefore based on emotion and intuition. But this non-verbal communication becomes significantly obstructed in remote interactions.

Therefore, as important as it is to use the ITP before in-person interaction at a co-location, it is even more critical to use the ITP before any remote interaction. This is because remote interactions exponentially increase ineffectiveness and distrust within human communication, which inevitably leads to the miscommunication of ideas. And ‘ideas’ within the education setting encompass all teacher instructions and student responses. The result of this type of miscommunication is even more failures after remote interactions than there were after in-person interactions. The ITP solves this issue by empowering individuals to form Idea Models which have a built-in emotional context and comprised of a deeper mosaic of information than regular ideas. Then the communication through Idea Models becomes extremely effective and trusted, no matter what platform individuals use to interact.

But the ITP is more critical to use for distance learning settings in education than it is even for remote work in corporations. This is because in co-locations, where both teachers and students are in the same classroom, they heavily rely on the advantage of having 90% of the communication be non-verbal. This is a huge co-location advantage that both teachers and students have always unconsciously taken for granted. Once that co-location advantage is taken away both teachers and students are at a huge disadvantage for remote communication. Consequently, the ITP gives back that powerful advantage to everyone that is teaching and learning remotely.

Now, with the Coronavirus changing so many lives, OIsource would like to help individuals and teams who may be learning and teaching remotely for the first time. We would like to ease this transition, from co-located classrooms to remote settings, by making the ITP course available at no charge at: oisource/teachable.com/p/itp

Just type in the code word: FreeITP within the coupon prompt when signing up. Then take the course and start your journey on developing a powerful distance learning.

Without knowing it, people engage with symphonic music on a regular basis. Think about it. Hollywood and the gaming industry extensively use symphonic music in their movies and games. The symphonic music uniquely enables emotion to imbue images with feeling and verbal dialogue with context. If you were to turn off the symphonic music, the images and dialogue within movies and games would come across as cold and incomplete. This is because the viewer would lack the emotional experience that comes from the music. Yet few make the connection between the benefits to society from movies and games and the benefits from music programs in U.S. Education.

That is why music teachers are constantly battling an underlying public perception that music programs are not important. Right now many of those music teachers are experiencing a lack of support and feel that the arts are going to lose funding and priority in education. They feel alone when making the case for their program’s relevance to students, parents, administrators and politicians. This article is written to help music teachers and give them hope about the future of music programs, as well as empower them with a new paradigm that is a breakthrough advocacy for why music programs are now essential in U.S. Education. (Click here for resources of extensive research that has already been done on the impact of music programs)

The core message of this new advocacy is that art and music are the strongest catalysts for creativity and the ability to be creative will be the future foundation for a successful society. Let’s first talk about art and music. Both are exactly the same vehicle but in different form; art is frozen music and music is liquid art. But what is now only being recognized is that the creative act of expressing art and music in turn stimulates more creativity. It is a powerful self-reinforcing loop. But the fluidity and impact of music makes it more powerful than art. And within music, the violin family of string instruments are unique in that they stimulate creativity the strongest. This is due to the strings being amplified by an instrument whose original design was developed through divine geometry centuries ago. The very movement of a bow along the strings induces vibrations that resonate in consonance with the quantum frequencies that comprise all of matter. Our minds sense this vibrational consonance in our bodies to further stimulate creativity.

The reason the powerful advantage of music to stimulate creativity is being outlined here is because in the near future the era of human labor will be ending and the era of human creativity will begin. That is why music teachers should have hope. Society will recognize the relevance and need for music programs! But we are not to that stage yet. First technology of quantum computing, artificial intelligence and big data will be integrated within cloud-based apps. These apps will create new business ecosystems by replacing human labor in engineering, medicine, finance, science and dozens of other fields. These new ecosystems will quickly scale throughout the world, especially now with the accelerated push into remote work and distance learning. The end result will be exponentially more disruptive than the industrial revolution. We can see evidence of this already happening. (Click here for more in-depth information on the future with technology apps)

In this new era, a consensus will begin to develop how the unique human potential for creativity will be the only advantage over technology, no matter how powerful technology becomes. At that point, the hard skills learned through standard education will become useless without the human also having the ability to stimulate creativity. That means, for humans to be relevant in the future, they will have to bring something new and creative to their work and learning every single day. Within this type of thinking there will be nearly unlimited potential for self-growth, which has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. This creative growth mindset is what will define human professional and personal success in the future. The humans that cannot be creative will eventually become unemployable and obsolete. (Click here for more in-depth information on the future requirement for creativity)

Therefore in this new era, the current education process will also become obsolete because it is based on grading students on how well they regurgitate memorized information. This process does nothing to stimulate the uniqueness of the human mind and instead just teaches students counter-productive skills to compete with the advancing technology. Educators are already seeing students being undermined by an outdated curriculum happening today. Albert Einstein understood this almost 100 years ago when he noted: “A society’s competitive advantage will come not from how well its schools teach the multiplication and periodic tables, but from how well they stimulate imagination and creativity.” (Click here for more in-depth information on the uniqueness of the human mind)

When this new era begins, U.S. Education will be caught off guard and will scramble to adapt. Educators and administrators will have no immediate solutions for how to transition an entire education system that will suddenly become irrelevant. Many educators already know that such a transition would lead to some form of Project Based Learning curriculum. But there still will be a lot of experimenting with different variations of this curriculum until a process is developed that can scale through all of U.S. Education. During this turbulent transition it will be the music programs, and especially the strings programs, that will be the relevant and essential anchors within U.S. Education. These programs will continue to foster the ability for students to be able to think creatively and sustain their potential for success. (Click here for an in-depth information on the future breakthrough scalable education system)

Soon it will be understood that playing an instrument will be a required cognitive workout in order to be successful in business and science. Just like it is currently understood that lifting weights is a required physical workout in order to be successful in sports and athletics. However, the future understanding of this bold new paradigm needs to begin now because the future of our music programs and students depends on it.