<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:cc="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/rss/creativeCommonsRssModule.html">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Stories by Mark Ajita Ph.D. on Medium]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[Stories by Mark Ajita Ph.D. on Medium]]></description>
        <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
        
        <generator>Medium</generator>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 02:21:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <webMaster><![CDATA[yourfriends@medium.com]]></webMaster>
        <atom:link href="http://medium.superfeedr.com/" rel="hub"/>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[An Upside Down Statement on Alan Watts]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/an-upside-down-statement-on-alan-watts-34ba05fe16b5?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/34ba05fe16b5</guid>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 14:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2025-12-05T14:40:15.364Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2F7_9bseor5Pc%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D7_9bseor5Pc&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2F7_9bseor5Pc%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/56122ef1c7e46e09f6f3b1273b32bf34/href">https://medium.com/media/56122ef1c7e46e09f6f3b1273b32bf34/href</a></iframe><p>A Multi-Polar Series of Observations on Multi-Polar Religion:</p><p>New Video delves into the scholarship of Alan Watts and reviews long term historical trends in the history of world religions and philosophy.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc">00:00</a> Alan Watts Collage Intro</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=22s">00:22</a> Koans 14 and 15 of Blue Cliff Record</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=59s">00:59</a> Ritual-I believe in What What I Do Does</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=72s">01:12</a> Watts on Eastern and Western Religion</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=142s">02:22</a> Watts and Foucault-if they met</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=157s">02:37</a> Watts on Confuciuanism, Convention, &amp; Ritual</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=234s">03:54</a> Gary Snyder and a Dharma Bums Timeline</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=360s">06:00</a> This Difficulty-the Meaning of Convention</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=393s">06:33</a> Maybe Arthur Whane talked to Japhy Ryder</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=408s">06:48</a> An Upside Down Statement on Ritual</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=428s">07:08</a> Figures of Ritual After Ritual</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=499s">08:19</a> To Beatniks and Boddhisatvas</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=516s">08:36</a> Disambiguation of Norms</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=534s">08:54</a> The Post-Avial Persistence of Ritual</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=544s">09:04</a> Decay Signatures. Particle collider.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=570s">09:30</a> Not a Clash of Civilizations Now</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=580s">09:40</a> What Jaspers Called Axial</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=610s">10:10</a> Ritual (Pre-Axial) Individual Community</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=640s">10:40</a> RItual (Post-Axial) Individual Community</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=655s">10:55</a> Shakesperean Boddhisatva (wizard Anywhere)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=682s">11:22</a> Entangling Vines, Beatnik or Boddhisatva?</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=710s">11:50</a> Foucauldian Narcissism</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=722s">12:02</a> Shamans and Tantrists (Big Chart)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=782s">13:02</a> Burkert, Ritual, Animals, Display</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=804s">13:24</a> Line of Ritual in History</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=838s">13:58</a> Heterosis</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=897s">14:57</a> The Axial Failure of Ritual in Heterosis</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=913s">15:13</a> The Definition of Tantra (Gordon White)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=936s">15:36</a> Retro-Shamanism, Neo-Tantrism</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1002s">16:42</a> A Neo-Retro-Kantian Analytical Take</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1009s">16:49</a> Religion and/Or Philosophy. East &amp; West.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1030s">17:10</a> Awareness in the East, Desire in the West</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1058s">17:38</a> Liberation and Regimentation</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1098s">18:18</a> Divinity and Demystification</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1125s">18:45</a> Zen and Chuang Tzu</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1138s">18:58</a> Nietzsche-Christianity’s Betrayal of Christ</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1237s">20:37</a> The Confucianism of Christ</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1260s">21:00</a> Between Buddha and Christ</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1280s">21:20</a> Brahminism, Jews as Tantrists of the Mid-East</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1320s">22:00</a> Buddhism pushed out of India (Bronkhorst)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1336s">22:16</a> Brahmins-Pastors of Caste. The Church.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1388s">23:08</a> Reincarnation</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1439s">23:59</a> Ritual Stratification in Early Heterosis</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1465s">24:25</a> The Embryo of History</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1518s">25:18</a> The Buddha’s Remembrance of 1k Past Lives</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1580s">26:20</a> World Historical Not Familial</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1590s">26:30</a> Ross Geller (Friends) Genogram</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1616s">26:56</a> What Could Possibly Be Reincarnated?</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1648s">27:28</a> Reincarnation in Brahminism and in Buddhism</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1675s">27:55</a> Salvation in the West. Enlightenment in the East.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1713s">28:33</a> Convention &amp; Desire (Girard)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1835s">30:35</a> But Why Awareness with Ritual?</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1903s">31:43</a> Dialogue Emerges (Socrates)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1916s">31:56</a> Ritual in the East, Convention in the West</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1942s">32:22</a> Desire and Celibacy (vs. Brahmin Endogamy)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1984s">33:04</a> Buddhism, Brahmins, Christ, Church</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=1998s">33:18</a> Watts on Christianity-Myth or Ideology</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2081s">34:41</a> The Only Church Ritual Already Happened</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2156s">35:56</a> Today, how do I know if It’s Ritual?</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2211s">36:51</a> Taoist Philosophy of Science (Warning)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2230s">37:10</a> Psycho-Therapy as Ritual?</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2269s">37:49</a> Watts in Kerouac’s Dharma Bums (1956/57)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2294s">38:14</a> Watts in Kerouac’s Desolation Angels (1956/63)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2413s">40:13</a> The Article in the New York Times</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2514s">41:54</a> Watts on the Beats (Deleuze Avec Watts)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2597s">43:17</a> The Unconscious-The Real New Frontier</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2751s">45:51</a> The Experience of Getting Easternized</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2810s">46:50</a> The Next Video-A Thousand Hounds</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2852s">47:32</a> The Tao of the West (The West Has No Taoism?)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2870s">47:50</a> The Watershed Moment of Spinoza’s Thought</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2883s">48:03</a> Taoism was Laissez-Faire (Rothbard)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2900s">48:20</a> So-Called Common Knowledge (Pinker)</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_9bseor5Pc&amp;t=2926s">48:46</a> Modern Mysticism and Demystification (Foucault)</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*_mGubRh4n-QIjEHWIV7gng.png" /></figure><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=34ba05fe16b5" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Oedipus: An Appropriate Statement (New Video Tomorrow)]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/oedipus-an-appropriate-statement-new-video-tomorrow-49526cefb050?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/49526cefb050</guid>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 07:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2025-07-07T07:56:16.878Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FeRotYaCGUbI%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fyoutube.com%2Fshorts%2FeRotYaCGUbI%3Ffeature%3Dshare&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FeRotYaCGUbI%2Fhq2.jpg&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/5992b530b60fb301d3fadb20759331a5/href">https://medium.com/media/5992b530b60fb301d3fadb20759331a5/href</a></iframe><p>The full video is launching tomorrow. Here are the timestamps.</p><p>00:00 Koan 14 of the Blue Cliff Record<br>00:19 An Appropriate Statement on Oedipus<br>00:39 The Oedipus Complex = Perverted Anecdote (Robert Graves)<br>01:20 Later Psychologists had to do away with the Oedipus Complex<br>01:45 Have We Ever Been Anti-Oedipal (world historical not familial)<br>02:09 An Emblem of a Certain Axialization<br>02:29 Extant Oedipal Tragedy<br>02:44 The Status of Kingship at this Greek Classic Axial Moment<br>03:29 Robert Bellah-Religion in Human Evolution<br>03:19 Bellah Quotes Archaeologist Bruce Trigger<br>03:30 Kingship and Divinity — 2 Parts of a Single Whole<br>03:40 Hocart-Divine Kingship Before Class<br>03:54 Hudson on the Rise of Oligarchy<br>04:28 The King is a Repository of the Gods (Hocart)<br>04:46 Caste vs. Class (and the Decline of Ritual)<br>05:05 Why did The King Become Divine (James Frazer)<br>05:52 People Knew What What they Did<br>06:01 In that World, Maybe There Was No Truth<br>06:14 And then, This is Was The World of Socrates<br>06:27 Did the Greeks Believe in their “Myths”?<br>06:54 The World of Early Ritual was a World of Consensus<br>07:08 What is Ritual to the Greeks? It’s a Sphinx.<br>07:14 And That’s OEDIPUS!<br>07:29 Oedipus REX: Ground Zero of Oedipus<br>07:57 Foucault: Tragedy a Ceremony of Rememorialization of Right<br>08:27 The Sphinx<br>08:33 Oedipus is at Odds with Delphi (3 Warnings)<br>08:37 Delphi. A Tragic Addition?<br>08:53 Oedipus THE KING in conflict with the Divine<br>08:59 The Embodiment of Decayed Ritual: The Sphinx<br>09:44 The figure of Tragic Oedipus: Aspect of any Valid Axialization<br>09:52 Foreign Kings and Oedipus’s Botched Naturalization<br>10:27 Truth of Birthright Undermines Kingship By Merit (Irony)<br>10:57 Oedipus Christ-Oedipus Buddha<br>11:13 Renouncers and Wanderers, Caste, Kingship, Delocalizers<br>11:51 Lack of Intention in Oedipus<br>12:01 Creon: The Figure of Class<br>12:09 When Foucault Looked at Oedipus Rex<br>12:27 Creon, the Ruling Class, and the Sequels to Oedipus Rex<br>12:44 Cain and Abel 2.0 (Eteocles and Polyneices)<br>13:13 The Mutilated Anecdote Carried Along by 7 Against Thebes<br>13:45 Aeschyus: The Dramatization of Ritual<br>13:50 Aeschylus VS. Euripides (Nietzsche)<br>14:12 Creon in Euripides’s Phoenecian Women<br>14:33 Tiresias<br>14:49 The Misuse of the Delphic Oracle by Royalty of Thebes<br>15:12 Tiresias says, Oedipus, You’re the Tragedy<br>15:25 Oedipus D.A.R.V.O.<br>15:42 Oedipus Noir<br>16:04 Oedipus Train Wreck<br>16:12 Not Only Do Oracles Structure the Play. They Are THE Problem.<br>17:18 Violations of the Delphic Maxims<br>18:00 Divination and What Machiavelli Says About Wisdom<br>19:04 Divination and Burroughs’s Cut-Up Method<br>19:19 Was the Prophecy true before the Oracle?<br>19:54 Freudian Prophecies (Childhood Predicts Adulthood)<br>21:33 Freud’s World History (Projection)<br>21:55 What Freud was Looking for in Tragedy<br>22:10 Being a Small Child Feels Terrible: Targeting Destruction<br>23:57 The Tragedians created Something Uncanny<br>23:15 J.P. Vernant’s Critique of Freud<br>23:43 Richard Seaford and Kings<br>23:52 Deleuze’s Introduction to Vernant<br>24:06 Spiritual Exercis-es in Philosophy<br>24:17 Tragedy: A Spiritual Exercise in Empathy (Freud’s Appropriation)<br>24:29 Freud’s Discovery: The Childhood Genesis of Personality<br>24:50 Euripides’s Comeditatio Malorum<br>25:23 Psychology &gt; Philosophy<br>25:40 Empathy and Freud’s Misinterpration of World History<br>26:20 Orestes<br>26:48 Oedipus Was Trying to Avoid Aggression to His Adopted Parents<br>27:15 Tiresias was the Dark Precursor to Psychoanalysis<br>27:56 From Oedipus to Narcissus. Tiresias/Psychoanalysis.<br>28:22 Misrecognition in the Mirror Pond of Ancient myth<br>28:39 Myth, Tragedy, Philosophy — Degraded meaning<br>28:59 Foucault’s Statement On Cynics, King Lear, Philosophy<br>28:27 The Disambiguation of Myth by Graves<br>29:46 Myth-Ritual — Convention-Ideology<br>30:23 Roland Barthes Mythology<br>30:30 The King as Living Myth<br>30:59 Failures of Kings in Ritual. Oedipus and Pentheus.<br>31:40 Rene Girard’s Oedipus Christ<br>31:50 Scapegoat — Degraded Meaning<br>32:18 Innocence of Oedipus, Socrates, Christ<br>32:48 Empathy in Societies of Ritual<br>33:17 Stephen Porges on Rituals of Coregulation or Fear<br>34:10 Why Stoicism Fails?<br>34:13 Empathy-From Social and Sacred to a Tactic<br>34:30 Empathy as a Way of Life<br>34:40 An Expression of God’s Will-Empathy with God (Deleuze’s Spinoza)<br>35:15 Deleuze’s Stoicism and Axial Empathy<br>35:49 Empathy in Zen? (Alternative Translations of Koan 14)<br>36:26 Empathy For/Empathy With<br>36:39 Redemption of Oedipus (Theseus/Colonus)<br>37:50 The Legacy of Tragedy in Modern Cinema and Television?<br>38:46 Benjamin on Mechanical Reproduction and Ritual<br>39:17 Conclusion<br>40:22 Dedication to Louisa Shea</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=49526cefb050" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Words Without Books: The One or Several Slavoje]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/words-without-books-the-one-or-several-slavoje-8dee3120731a?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/8dee3120731a</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[zizek]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[slavoj-zizek]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2024 13:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2024-12-27T13:13:58.748Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FSI3OLcGSfzo%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DSI3OLcGSfzo&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FSI3OLcGSfzo%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/4e11b20928c1921e2349d8cd7831d373/href">https://medium.com/media/4e11b20928c1921e2349d8cd7831d373/href</a></iframe><p>The greatest theorist of ideology from our era when ideology has reached its greatest heights.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=8dee3120731a" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Two or Three David Graeber Problem]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/the-two-or-three-david-graeber-problem-7d9094ca59e1?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/7d9094ca59e1</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[david-graeber]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:25:13 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2024-09-25T16:25:13.390Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FzegPanuVIiQ%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DzegPanuVIiQ&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FzegPanuVIiQ%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/2a7c790c7dacfba92e513b020326c48e/href">https://medium.com/media/2a7c790c7dacfba92e513b020326c48e/href</a></iframe><p><a href="https://youtu.be/zegPanuVIiQ?si=U4IhbIjjo3IyQWlH"><strong>The After of Other Things: A New Theory of the 2 or 3 David Graeber Problem</strong></a><strong> </strong>takes a look at the intertwined concepts of sovereignty and debt in Graeber’s most provocative texts — and traces some of his major collaborations and influences in the context of the last two+ decades of American history and theory.</p><p>This is the first in a series of 3 videos. Part 2:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*wgkkEAFwclXS9_CMPwWPRA.png" /></figure><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=7d9094ca59e1" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The End of the Deleuzean Century]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/the-end-of-the-deleuzean-century-0bd5d3a9e1cf?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/0bd5d3a9e1cf</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[deleuze]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[foucault]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[critical-theory]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2024-07-18T11:24:02.881Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FRtSnCQjxq7I%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DRtSnCQjxq7I&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FRtSnCQjxq7I%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/d411759a128fa1efe2b2fd8ab8abde5f/href">https://medium.com/media/d411759a128fa1efe2b2fd8ab8abde5f/href</a></iframe><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=0bd5d3a9e1cf" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Two Questions of Theory]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/the-two-questions-of-theory-5f54bfd56703?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/5f54bfd56703</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[critical-theory]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 11:51:21 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2024-06-06T11:51:21.370Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Part 1 of 3)</p><iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FGSvR5yK54Ko%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DGSvR5yK54Ko&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FGSvR5yK54Ko%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/c50ad6ad184cbad682de575d8e200190/href">https://medium.com/media/c50ad6ad184cbad682de575d8e200190/href</a></iframe><p>Dedicated to Jean Luc Godard</p><p>00:00 What is Theory? Theory is a History of Theory.</p><p>00:19 History of Philosophy is a Part of Theory</p><p>00:38 Really What You Need to Do is Look at the Twentieth Century, The Long Twentieth Century</p><p>00:47 You Can Have a History of Philosophy But You Cannot Have a Philosophy of History</p><p>1:07 Just Like Philosophy is Nothing without the Philosophers, Theory is Nothing without the Long Twentieth Century of Writers</p><p>1:27 But This Is Not An Introduction to Theory Class</p><p>1:40 Pursuing these Two Questions of Theory Was the Motivation for My Off Course Texts Project</p><p>2:00 The Problem with the 2 Problems of Theory</p><p>2:23 Let Me Tell You What the 2 Questions Are</p><p>2:26 Question A:</p><p>3:37 Problem 2:</p><p>4:42 Two questions</p><p>5:04 Freud Gone Mad?</p><p>5:13 The Off Course Texts Explores the Potential for Viewing These as 2 Sides of the Same Coin</p><p>5:24 Theory Qua Philosophy?</p><p>5:51 Philosophy is Our Sphinx</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=5f54bfd56703" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Kant Avec Foucault, or, The Kingdom of Loose Ends]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/kant-avec-foucault-or-the-kingdom-of-loose-ends-06f97c75a4ca?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/06f97c75a4ca</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[foucault]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[critical-theory]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 10:49:24 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2024-06-06T11:56:23.291Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2024: The Year Philosophy Dies</p><iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2F3wmdtJh7nf8%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D3wmdtJh7nf8&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2F3wmdtJh7nf8%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="854" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/e7152d4d240a2eba51089f60778d9c05/href">https://medium.com/media/e7152d4d240a2eba51089f60778d9c05/href</a></iframe><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">00:00 2024: The Year Philosophy Dies</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">00:15 History is Not Lived in Multiples of Ten</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">00:42 Attempts to Encapsulate Foucault’s Radically Incomplete Work: A very Short Introduction</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">2:04 Kant’s Critical Philosophy Getting Out of Hand</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">2:46 We can say that in ‘modern philosophy there has been a tradition of metasophism that runs from the disciples of kant to those of Foucault</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">3:04 Ironic Dilemmas of Historical Transmission of Doctrine, Testimony, Meaning</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">4:04 Theory Qua Philosophy?</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">4:25 Three Hundred Plus or Minus Forty Years: A Pretty Amazing Unit</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">5:58 Reason, Ritual, History</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">6:14 10 Generations: The Epoch We Are Leaving</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">6:30 Kant’s Enlightenment: A Diagram of Pure Reason in the Critical Philosophy</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">6:58 The Truth Comes from Our Reason Not from What We Perceive</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">7:08 A Need to Motivate the Turn Towards Reason that Will Bring About the Kingdom of Ends</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">7:23 Kant’s Theologico-Teleological Problem</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">7:40 The Line of the Sublime/Beautiful/God</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">8:20 Can a Mechanism of History Operate in Critical Philosophy?</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">8:40 What Did Foucault Think About It? (Deleuze’s Version of Foucault)</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">9:10 The Great Thing About this Diagramme</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">9:47 The Kantian Enigma</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">10:58 These Are the 2 Questions of Theory</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">11:13 Where Foucault Saw His Own Work…</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">11:30 Kant Credited Plato with Notion that we do not have a priori access to things in themselves…</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">11:44 Foucault’s studies of antiquity/Christianity were the beginnings of an axialization</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">12:06 When you fold Foucault’s studies of antiquity into the capitalism and schizophrenia problem…</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">12:30 recommended</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">12:38 recommended?</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">13:01 Recommended: The Off Course Texts/Belief-O-Nomics</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">13:42 Isn’t Deleuze Philosophy? (Donald Trump Impression)</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">13:55 Well, Look at What Deleuze’s Philosophy Was</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">14:12 Nasty Kant</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">14:21 This is the End of the Delezean Century</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">14:46 Spinoza’s Boot Stepping on the Faces of Hegel and Wittgenstein, Forever</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">15:00 Evil in the Strata (Foucault Over Kant)</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">15:45 Recommended “Marc Djaballah’s Gap,” Shea, Han, Berhent, Lorenzi, Davidson, Etc.</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">16:05 Spiritual Exercise… and</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">16:25 Diagramme (A Definition in French) and the biggest need for a diagram</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">17:01 Spinozist Enlightenment-Alliances-Harmony17:10 Foucault’s Personal Communication to Dreyfus/Rabinow</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">17:45 Kant’s Empirical Problem</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">18:25 History of Reason? What Would A Kantian Axialization Look Like?</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">19:50 But What Would a Foucauldian Axialization Look Like</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">19:58 Foucault’s Books/Lectures on Parrhesia and Greek Thought</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">20:03 Foucault’s Books on Power’s Production of Knowledge in Modernity</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">20:09 Foucault’s Oedipus</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">20:34 Why Was Foucault’s Axialization More Than Kant’s Axialization?</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">21:19 Socrates in Axialization and the Problem of Belief — — A Foucauldian Definition of Belief?</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">21:48 War Against Convention</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">22:28 Structure of Belief and Convention (Norms)</a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/3wmdtJh7nf8?si=BjHw-l1jjKupeoJZ">22:57 Next Video</a></p><p>please check out the video. This is part 2/3 of a series on theory at <a href="http://youtube.com/@markajita">http://youtube.com/@markajita</a></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=06f97c75a4ca" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Choose and Die!]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/choose-and-die-ecbf569b84f8?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/ecbf569b84f8</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[ancient-history]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[ecology]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2023 06:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2023-07-02T07:08:23.814Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>(A proposal for the distinction between Choice and Decision)</h3><p>The final 7th chapter from last year’s</p><p><strong>Serendipity Lost: Eden and its Consequences.</strong></p><p>Instead of “Happy Accidents,” we might call Serendipity, the happiness in every accident and the accident that comes along with every planned success. A radical break with plans that is often required to reap good fortune from what is outside your plans. In order to “embrace the accident,” one often has to drop the other hopes one was holding on to. To reap the rewards of Serendipity, you need to abandon the plans you had previously wanted to succeed. Serendipity is, by definition, a diversion.</p><p>Watch/Listen to the chapter!</p><iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2F9_Z_UJ_dDXA%3Flist%3DPLOQZyRR0OIptU2d8DpzzV9rwGMmxPcffz&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D9_Z_UJ_dDXA&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2F9_Z_UJ_dDXA%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/6255726001924cd1f572d5fddc707345/href">https://medium.com/media/6255726001924cd1f572d5fddc707345/href</a></iframe><h3>Coming Soon: <strong>Beliefonomics, Or, Why Philosophy Fails</strong></h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/988/1*zDczxvLkZIzE7-wjRdBYVg.png" /><figcaption>“The Cover”</figcaption></figure><p>And Chapter 1/12:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*FjhoV7yqTS0CoIBV9X5UvA.png" /><figcaption>This ALWAYS works. Its not what you think.</figcaption></figure><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=ecbf569b84f8" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Tao in Eden]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/tao-in-eden-b84c08782a9a?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/b84c08782a9a</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[judaism]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[taoism]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy-of-religion]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[serendipity]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2022-12-12T16:20:30.677Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*yR9J_OET92qn4UA9I-JDQw.jpeg" /><figcaption>Audiobook Chapter below.</figcaption></figure><p>Key passages from the classics of Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu turn backwards in time to an age where humans respected the power of serendipity rather than the power of planning. If Eden — as many have hypothesized — represented a hunter-gatherer oikos, then we might also imagine that there was a Tao in Eden…</p><iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2Fpt-sv2JUejA%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dpt-sv2JUejA&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2Fpt-sv2JUejA%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/b9e1b684cbcbd42e0edc498d53c0da0d/href">https://medium.com/media/b9e1b684cbcbd42e0edc498d53c0da0d/href</a></iframe><p>Not only that, moving forward from the revolutionary (perhaps primitivist) Taoist mindset in the context of Early Civilizations, this way of rediscovering a relationship to (hunter-gatherer) serendipity lost with the neolithic turn also set the stage for revolutions closer to our modern times. The theme of ancient taoist roots of modernity is described further in the next chapter: “Laissez-Faire as Serendipity Imperative.”</p><p>This is Chapter 5 of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkrNz8_7y8&amp;list=PLOQZyRR0OIptU2d8DpzzV9rwGMmxPcffz"><strong>Serendipity Lost: Eden and its Consequences</strong></a><strong>. </strong>This chapter has gotten fewer listens than the others but it may be the most interesting, for many reasons…</p><p>This audiobook is read by the author.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=b84c08782a9a" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Stop Talking About Paradise Lost! Eden is About Serendipity Lost.]]></title>
            <link>https://medium.com/@mark_ajita/stop-talking-about-paradise-lost-eden-is-about-serendipity-lost-3a8b6373f6c4?source=rss-e03b447d2347------2</link>
            <guid isPermaLink="false">https://medium.com/p/3a8b6373f6c4</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[taoism]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[judaism]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy-of-religion]]></category>
            <category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Ajita Ph.D.]]></dc:creator>
            <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <atom:updated>2022-12-12T14:37:00.455Z</atom:updated>
            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*_EUoVR1HzOwbP35mI_Q_ZQ.jpeg" /><figcaption>Audiobook just below.</figcaption></figure><p>Few philosophers have done more to connect the Neolithic Turn with the myth of Eden from Genesis in the Bible than the late novelist Daniel Quinn. Yet, perhaps we need to go further understand what was really lost in the human turn to agricultural practice. In Serendipity Lost, we propose that what was lost in the fading away of hunter-gatherer lifeways was Serendipity: a relationship of acceptance and celebration of unplanned goods and potentials. Furthermore, we can consider the founding storytellers of Judaism, the storytellers who first told the story of Eden as rediscoverers of Serendipity in the context of civilization.</p><iframe src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FukkrNz8_7y8%3Fstart%3D692%26feature%3Doembed%26start%3D692&amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DukkrNz8_7y8&amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FukkrNz8_7y8%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;key=a19fcc184b9711e1b4764040d3dc5c07&amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;schema=youtube" width="640" height="480" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"><a href="https://medium.com/media/31d6c3af9814f4f2cedca8681045f384/href">https://medium.com/media/31d6c3af9814f4f2cedca8681045f384/href</a></iframe><p>This is Chapter 1 of 7 of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkrNz8_7y8&amp;list=PLOQZyRR0OIptU2d8DpzzV9rwGMmxPcffz"><strong>Serendipity Lost: Eden and Its Consequences.</strong></a></p><p>Serendipity Lost is the first book of The Off Course Texts: A Series of Philosophical Reflections on the Big Here and the Long Now.</p><p>Coming Soon: BOOK 3…. BELIEFONOMICS, OR, WHY PHILOSOPHY FAILS</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&referrerSource=full_rss&postId=3a8b6373f6c4" width="1" height="1" alt="">]]></content:encoded>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>