The approval of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs has generated excitement among investors. However, there are growing concerns that these financial products might not be as beneficial for the cryptocurrency ecosystem as they appear.

Some believe they could be Trojan horses designed to control what was meant to be uncontrollable.

Major Institutions’ Sudden Interest in Crypto

Historically, major institutions like BlackRock have been critical of Bitcoin. For instance, BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink, once remarked, “Bitcoin just shows you how much demand for money laundering there is in the world. That’s all it is.” Yet, BlackRock has now launched a spot Bitcoin ETF. This sudden change in stance raises questions about their true motives.

BlackRock’s Global Tokenization Plans

BlackRock’s interest extends beyond Bitcoin. They have ambitious plans for global tokenization, aiming to tokenize assets like real estate, energy, and agriculture. While this might seem like a positive development, it could undermine the foundational principles of cryptocurrencies.

ETFs and Bitcoin’s Original Purpose

Bitcoin was originally designed by Satoshi Nakamoto as a peer-to-peer payment system, not just a speculative asset or store of value.

However, ETFs turn Bitcoin into a speculative product, shifting its original utility.

Although solutions like the Lightning Network can enhance Bitcoin’s role as a payment system, a lack of liquidity could hinder its adoption.

The Impact of ETF Growth on Bitcoin

Currently, most Bitcoin is held by individuals, but this could change as ETFs grow. ETFs now represent 4% of the total BTC. While this may seem low, it’s significant given the short accumulation period. As ETF holdings increase, they could make Bitcoin more manipulable.

The Risk of Liquidation and Price Manipulation

Bitcoin ETFs have clauses allowing them to be liquidated at any time. This means that under certain conditions, like regulatory changes, all Bitcoin in the ETF could be sold, causing a massive liquidation and price drop.

Moreover, BlackRock chose J.P. Morgan as a counterpart for its Bitcoin ETF. J.P. Morgan has a history of financial scandals, including manipulating gold prices.

In December 2023, J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon said he would “close down” Bitcoin and crypto if he were the government. Twenty days later, BlackRock named J.P. Morgan as a counterpart for its Bitcoin ETF, highlighting potential conflicts of interest.

Broader Implications: Digital Development and Control

BlackRock shares a vision with the United Nations, including goals like digital development with integrated wallets, health cards, digital currencies, smart cities, and blockchain technologies.

While these goals seem positive, they align with increasing control and surveillance, contrasting with the decentralization and freedom cryptocurrencies were meant to promote.

Maintaining Independence in the Crypto Space

For many, the goal of cryptocurrencies is to achieve freedom and independence in payment systems and technology. However, institutions like BlackRock and governments have different goals.

They do not prioritize individual freedom or independence. Therefore, it’s crucial to remain cautious of new financial products and to hold onto your Bitcoins to maintain control over your assets.

The Dark Side of Crypto ETFs was originally published in Life And Technology on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Crowdfunding has emerged as a transformative force in journalism financing. In the rapidly evolving landscape of journalism, the traditional models of funding have been challenged by the rise of crowdfunding platforms. Nowhere is this more evident than in the United Kingdom, where a blend of innovation and necessity has propelled the practice to the forefront of media sustainability.

All traditional publishers in the Anglo-Saxon world such as The Washington Post, The London Times, The Guardian, but also revived traditional magazines such as The Lloyds Chronicle are following this path.

Crowdfunding in journalism entails soliciting funds from a large number of people, often through online platforms, to finance reporting projects or sustain news organizations. This model has gained traction as a response to declining advertising revenues and the growing demand for independent and investigative journalism.

One of the most intriguing aspects of crowdfunding in journalism is its potential to democratize the media landscape. By allowing readers to directly contribute to the stories they want to see, crowdfunding platforms empower individuals to shape the news agenda and support topics that may otherwise be overlooked by mainstream media outlets.

However, perhaps the most transformative development in journalism funding is the emergence of quality-driven subscription models. In these models, readers are not merely passive consumers of news but active participants in determining its value. Instead of relying solely on advertising or one-time donations, news organizations are increasingly turning to subscription-based revenue streams, where the quality of their reporting directly influences readers’ willingness to pay.

This shift towards quality-driven subscriptions marks a departure from the traditional paywall approach, where access to content is restricted until a monetary transaction occurs. Instead, readers are encouraged to become paying subscribers based on the perceived value and integrity of the journalism they receive. This creates a symbiotic relationship between news organizations and their audiences, where trust and credibility are paramount.

The success of quality-driven subscription models hinges on several factors. Firstly, news organizations must prioritize transparency and accountability to foster trust with their readership. This includes disclosing how subscription revenues are allocated and providing regular updates on the impact of their reporting. Secondly, there must be a clear emphasis on producing high-quality, in-depth journalism that resonates with readers and addresses their information needs.

In the United Kingdom, several news outlets have embraced this shift towards quality-driven subscriptions with promising results. By offering readers access to exclusive content, personalized newsletters, and interactive features, these organizations have been able to cultivate loyal subscriber bases who value the integrity and depth of their reporting.

Looking ahead, the future of crowdfunding in journalism holds immense potential for innovation and sustainability. As traditional revenue streams continue to fluctuate, news organizations must adapt to meet the evolving needs and expectations of their audiences. By prioritizing quality-driven subscriptions and empowering readers to directly support the journalism they believe in, the United Kingdom is poised to lead the way in shaping the future of media funding and accountability.

Freedom of expression being threatened in Western regions, particularly since 2020, by post-fascist political structures with a red-green hue, has become increasingly apparent. That’s why independent reporting and free press is so important. Of course there is freedom of the press, but not a free press. A free word endures as such through varied and independent financing models. Receiving £1.2 million annually from a single NGO versus garnering the same amount from approximately 20,000 subscribers across 15 different countries makes a significant difference in publication funding.

Ultimately, it is the reader, not the individuals subject to the reporting, who holds the authority in deciding the significance of press content. This emphasizes the importance of individual interpretation and critical engagement when dealing with the diverse media offerings. And it is the optimal approach to prevent an informal catastrophe.

In the dynamic realm of journalism financing, both crowdfunding and subscription models are key players shaping media sustainability. While crowdfunding empowers individuals to champion specific stories and topics, quality-driven subscriptions underscore the value of integrity and trust between news organizations and their readers. In an evolving landscape, readers hold the key to preserving the principles of a free press through their active support and engagement, thereby fostering the growth of diverse and independent voices.

Next time we face a paywalled article or a subscription request, let’s bear in mind: everything comes with a price, but only a select few hold genuine value.

Are Pure Subscription Models the Key? was originally published in Life And Technology on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.