By Rui Zhu

If you want an easier experience, a hands-free vibrator might catch your attention first. Before buying, though, ask yourself: which part are you hoping to make easier?

Holding it the whole time? Reaching the buttons to change a setting? Having to get everything back into place whenever you move?

A design that helps with one of those frustrations may leave the others untouched.

Imagine comparing two external vibrators. One sits against the body, held in place by a wearable design, with a separate remote. The other is handheld: your hand guides the contact, and the buttons are on the handle.

Each has its conveniences. The wearable is meant to save you from gripping the product throughout use. The handheld gives you direct control over where it touches. Even though both provide external vibration, differences in the contact surface and how they sit against your body can make them feel quite different.

So before deciding which is easier, check whether both offer a kind of contact you actually want to try. That is the thinking behind the AmorousArt Feel-First Method™: start with the experience you want, then consider whether the way a product works suits you.

Which part is it making easier?

With the wearable, you first need to work out how to place it, what holds it there, and how to make small adjustments. The remote lets you change the settings it supports without reaching the product. It cannot move the product into a different position for you.

The handheld needs your hand to support and guide it. That can become tiring, but it also lets you adjust the angle and contact directly.

There is one moment I particularly want a product description to explain: what happens when you need to adjust a setting?

Can you keep the comfortable position you have just found while making that adjustment? Or do you have to change your grip, reach awkwardly for a button, or stop and reposition the whole thing?

That matters more to me than how many control options appear on the feature list.

Some conveniences remove an action altogether. Others move the work to a different stage. Taking a little time to position a product may be a worthwhile trade-off if it means you do not have to keep holding it. If you prefer to move the contact around frequently, that arrangement may be less useful.

A promotional video that only shows a product switching on by remote does not tell me enough. I want to see how it is placed, adjusted, moved back if it shifts, and taken off afterward. Those actions give me a much better sense of what using it involves.

Fewer steps do not necessarily mean less effort

Holding a handle for five minutes and briefly pressing a button could each be described as “one step.” Counting steps alone misses the difference in physical effort.

How long you hold something, the position you maintain, and how often you need to move all affect the experience.

If your main frustration is that your hand gets tired, a wearable may be worth considering. The next questions are practical: what keeps this particular model in place, and how would you adjust it if it shifted?

If reaching the product is the awkward part, the location of the controls deserves more attention. With a separate remote, check whether it is comfortable to hold, whether the buttons are easy to press, and whether it offers the functions you need.

You might understand the controls at a glance and still find them inconvenient during use. Knowing exactly which button to press does not help much if you cannot comfortably reach it from your position.

For a handheld product, look at weight alongside the handle’s shape and the button layout. Light does not automatically mean easy to hold. A lightweight design could still require an awkward grip. A slightly thicker handle might suit your hand better, although specifications alone cannot settle that.

Decide what you most want to improve: the effort of holding, the need to reposition, or the reach required to adjust settings. Then compare products with that particular concern in mind.

Three questions to ask before choosing

For each product you are considering, ask:

• What does this design make easier for me?
• What do I still have to do myself?
• Which remaining task is most likely to feel inconvenient or interrupt the experience?

Suppose your answer is: “I do not want to hold something continuously, but I am happy to spend time getting it into position.”

When looking at a wearable, check whether the instructions explain how it is supported and how to adjust it if it moves. Confirm what the remote can change and how to switch the product off. If the description simply says “hands-free,” ask the seller: how exactly does it stay in place, and what do I do if it shifts?

For a handheld alternative, a demonstration may help you judge whether changing a setting requires switching hands or altering your grip. Watch for the particular movement you want to make easier.

Of course, product information has limits. Instructions can explain the sequence of actions, but they cannot guarantee that a shape will fit your body comfortably or stay in exactly the same position throughout use.

Our guide to vibrator contact and control explores these differences in more detail. “Remote-controlled” describes how you operate a product. How it touches your body and how it stays positioned are separate questions.

Read the cleaning and charging instructions before buying, too. Those routines are part of what you will need to manage regularly.

You do not need to find a product that solves every possible problem. Return to the particular frustration that made you look for something easier in the first place. If the description does not explain how the design addresses that need, “easy to use” has not answered your question.

Before your next comparison, finish this sentence:

“I want it to be easier to ________.”

Then look at what the design actually changes, and whether you are comfortable with the steps it leaves to you.

Rui Zhu is the founder of AmorousArt, a women-focused intimate wellness brand.

Stop Shopping by Tech Specs: Why “Hands-Free” Doesn’t Mean Effortless was originally published in Mr. Plan ₿ Publication on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

The machines are getting smarter. The equation still needs a human answer

By Anis Labidi
October 7, 2026

In 2025, I wrote about a strange mathematical coincidence

2025 = 45²

And:

45 = 1 + 2 + 3 + … + 9

Even stranger:

2025 = 1³ + 2³ + 3³ + … + 9³

A year where the little things were squared, the habits were cubed, and our digital appetites somehow became a civilization.

But 2025 is over.

So here is the equation nobody in 2026 should be able to ignore:

2026 = 2025 + 1

Beautifully stupid.

Terrifyingly obvious.

Because the +1 is you.

Not AI.

Not the algorithm.

Not Washington, Moscow, Beijing, Brussels, Tokyo, or whatever capital is currently producing the day's strongest adjective.

You.

Everything humanity accumulated in 2025 has entered 2026.

Then every one of us added something.

A word.

A vote.

A silence.

A repost.

A prayer.

A lie.

A little compassion.

Or another “I will annihilate them.”

The +1 Problem

AI was supposed to make us intelligent.

Perhaps 2026 will reveal whether it can make us wise.

Call it the great upgrade:

AI → SI

Artificial Intelligence → Spiritual Intelligence.

Because a machine can generate “send them to hell” in 0.2 seconds.

It can translate “kill Isa ibn Maryam again if he returns” into dozens of languages.

It can manufacture an insult faster than a human can pronounce forgiveness.

But none of that answers the only question that matters:

Should I say it?

That question belongs to SI.

And suddenly the equation becomes personal:

2026 = 2025 + 1

The +1 is not humanity.

It is my contribution to humanity.

Your contribution.

Mine.

The leader's.

The believer's.

The atheist's.

The journalist's.

The programmer's.

The anonymous account screaming into a phone at 2:17 a.m.

Everyone gets a +1.

The Convenient Human

We have become remarkably sophisticated at loving people conditionally.

We welcome the foreigner when the economy needs workers.

We celebrate diversity when tourism needs customers.

We defend borders when fear needs a costume.

We discover compassion when cameras arrive.

Then we call it policy.

Japan offers one particularly fascinating example of this modern contradiction: a society with strong concerns about immigration and cultural cohesion, while demographic and economic realities make foreign workers and visitors increasingly valuable.

Convenience has become a strange moral philosophy:

“You may enter, provided you are useful.”

But the equation doesn't care about usefulness.

A human is still a human when economically inconvenient.

So What Will 2026 Produce?

2025 gave us the material.

2026 adds the human variable.

And that means the final result isn't known yet.

That's the beautiful part.

2026 is still calculating.

Maybe our +1 becomes another threat.

Another humiliation.

Another algorithm trained on anger.

Another border drawn through someone's heart.

Or perhaps the +1 becomes restraint.

Mercy.

Curiosity.

A conversation with someone we were trained to hate.

A notification turned off.

A sacred text opened.

A weaponized sentence left unwritten.

Because perhaps the greatest mathematical discovery of 2026 will not be made by mathematicians.

It will be made by ordinary people who finally understand:

The equation includes them.

2025 was 45².

2026 is 2025 + 1.

And if the +1 is you—

what exactly are you adding?

Author’s note:

This article was written in 2026, a year that is still under construction and therefore cannot yet be blamed for its final result.

Years change. Equations remain. Governments change slogans. Leaders change enemies. Algorithms change what we call knowledge. Somehow, humanity keeps finding new ways to repeat old mistakes with better technology.

And yes, some forms of injustice and oppression may worsen before they improve. Japan, like every country, deserves scrutiny for the contradictions between its treatment of outsiders, demographic realities, economic convenience, and national identity—not a free pass simply because its convenience stores are wonderfully convenient.

The larger joke is darker:

Perhaps ignorance is not disappearing. Perhaps it is being upgraded into artificial knowledge.

We can now know more, faster, in more languages, with more precision—and still misunderstand one another spectacularly.

Maybe that is where repentance begins.

Not when machines become conscious.

When humans become conscious of what they have been doing.

Non-Waiver Disclaimer

Nothing in this article constitutes a waiver of the author's right to criticize governments, leaders, institutions, ideologies, algorithms, cultures, or the author's own species.

The mathematical equations are real.

The metaphors are intentional.

The predictions are provisional.

The satire is satire.

The countries mentioned are not collectively represented by their governments, nor are governments represented by every person living under their flags.

If 2026 ultimately proves this article wrong, excellent.

If it proves it right, that would be considerably less funny.

And if humanity eventually repents, becomes wiser, and discovers that SI means something more than lips business, the author hereby reserves the right to say:

“I told you the +1 was you.”

2026 = 2025 + 1 → The Year AI Meets SI was originally published in Mr. Plan ₿ Publication on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

65 Wars. One Target. Zero Fear. This Is Not Conspiracy—It’s Qur’anic Reality.

By Anis Labidi
September 27, 2026

The Unvarnished Truth: What Allah Revealed About Power, Oppression, and the Enemies of Believers

This article does not seek approval. It seeks only Allah’s pleasure. It is written for those who read the Qur’an with their eyes open, not for those who repeat what they heard from politicians, media, or inherited traditions. If it angers you, ask yourself: is it the truth that angers you, or your attachment to lies?

1. The Angels Knew—Before Adam Was Created
   Allah tells us in the Qur’an what happened before the first human walked the earth:
   “And when your Lord said to the angels, ‘Indeed, I will make upon the earth a successive authority.’ They said, ‘Will You place upon it one who causes corruption therein and sheds blood, while we declare Your praise and sanctify You?’ Allah said, ‘Indeed, I know that which you do not know.’”
   — Qur’an 2:30
   
   The angels did not speak from ignorance. They spoke from what they knew of creation: that humans would kill, corrupt, steal, and wage war. Allah did not deny it. He said: “I know what you do not know.”
   That knowledge is this: among humans will be those who submit to Allah, and those who submit to Shaitan. Among them will be tyrants who steal lands, weaponize law, and turn brother against brother. And among them will be believers who stand firm, even when the world turns against them.
   Today, more than 65 armed conflicts rage across the globe—the highest number since World War II. In 2025 alone, approximately 244,600 people were killed in conflict. Who benefits? Who profits? Who sleeps soundly while cities burn?
2. The Worst Enemies of Believers—As Allah Named Them
   Allah does not speak in riddles when it comes to enmity. He says clearly:
   “You will surely find the most bitter towards the believers to be the Jews and polytheists (Idolators/Idols worshipers), and the most gracious to be those who call themselves Christians. That is because there are priests and monks among them and because they are not arrogant.”
   — Qur’an 5:82
   
   This is not hate speech. This is divine diagnosis. It is not about individuals. It is about systems, ideologies, and historical patterns. When a rabbi says on television, “Palestinians deserve worse than murder,” or when another declares, “If Issa ibnu Mariam returns, we will kill him again,” they are not speaking as individuals. They are speaking as representatives of a system that has declared war on Allah’s messengers—and on those who follow them.
   And when politicians, media, and institutions normalize such speech—when spies record, blackmail, and bribe UN officials, when defamation becomes policy—do not act surprised. This is the work of Sects of Shaitan, as Allah calls them.
   “Indeed, Satan is an enemy to you, so take him as an enemy. He only invites his party to be among the companions of the Blaze.”
   — Qur’an 35:6
   
   Shaitan fears Allah. But many humans do not. They commit atrocities Shaitan himself would shy from—because they have no fear, no shame, and no accountability except to their own greed.
3. The Greater Israel Plan: From the Nile to the Euphrates
   This is not conspiracy. This is stated openly.
   The so-called “Greater Israel” project—Eretz Israel HaShlema—is not hidden. It is biblical, political, and military. It stretches from the Nile River in Egypt to the Euphrates River in Iraq, encompassing:
   - All of historic Palestine
   - Lebanon
   - Jordan
   - Southern Syria
   - Parts of Iraq
   - Northern Saudi Arabia (including areas near Medina)
   - Sinai in Egypt
   Theodor Herzl, founder of political Zionism, declared in 1904: “The borders of the State of Israel will extend from the Nile to the Euphrates.” Rabbi Fishman repeated it before the UN in 1947. Today, Israeli ministers and settlers speak it openly.
   Why all this chaos in the Middle East? Why proxy wars in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon? Why the attempt to drag Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and others into conflict?
   Because chaos is the ladder. Division is the tool. And the prize is land, resources, and strategic dominance.
4. Japan: Unrepentant Fascism, Then and Now
   Do not forget history. Japan’s Imperial Army did not only kill Chinese in Nanjing. They massacred Muslims, destroyed mosques, and raped tens of thousands. The Hui Muslim community was targeted. Mosques were filled with dead bodies.
   Estimates: 300,000 dead. 80,000 raped. And Japan never fully atoned.
   Today, in May 2016, Japan’s Supreme Court ruled that all Muslims are subject to blanket surveillance, classified as potential enemies—despite the fact that terrorism in Japan has been committed by homegrown right-wing extremists, not Muslims.
   When two Muslims were attacked near the Russian Embassy in Tokyo by right-wing assailants, the police headquarters replied in writing: “Transparency unaccepted.” A prosecutor said: “If you or your spouse were attacked, nobody is responsible.”
   Japan supports Ukraine—not for justice, but because they hate Russia. They supported certain Muslim groups in China—not for solidarity, but to use them against the West. This is not foreign policy. This is opportunism dressed as principle.
5. The UN: A Complaint-Free Dial for the Oppressors
   The United Nations Security Council has five permanent members with veto power: USA, UK, France, Russia, China.
   Any one of them can block any resolution—no matter how just, no matter how urgent. This is not a bug. It is a feature. The UN was designed by the victors of WWII to protect their interests, not to uphold justice.
   When Gaza burns, the veto is used. When Palestine is erased, the veto is used. When tyranny spreads, the veto is silent.
   The UN is not a court. It is a stress-release valve—where oppressors give speeches, pass resolutions, and go back to arming their proxies.
6. Mecca: Not for Kings, Not for Families—For Allah Alone
   Mecca does not need skyscrapers. It does not need luxury hotels. It does not need political families controlling its gates.
   “And [mention] when We made the House a place of return for the people and [a place of] security.”
   — Qur’an 2:125
   
   Mecca belongs to Allah alone. It belongs to all Muslims—not to one sect, one family, one dynasty. It should be simple, accessible, and protected by Allah—not by armies, not by surveillance, not by political agendas.
   If missiles are fired toward Mecca—and blamed on Houthis, or Iranians, or any group—do not be fooled. This is the old game: create chaos, blame the enemy, unite the umma against a phantom, while the real enemies steal, divide, and rule.
7. The Choice: Unity or Perish
   Allah says:
   “Indeed, this nation of yours is one nation, and I am your Lord, so worship Me.”
   — Qur’an 21:92
   
   Muslims are not one because they agree on everything. They are one because they submit to One God. If they do not unify—not in politics, but in Din—they will perish. Not because Allah abandons them, but because they abandon Allah.
   “Indeed, Allah will not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.”
   — Qur’an 13:11
   
   If Muslims continue to mix Din with politics, to chase approval from Jews and Christians, to fear people more than Allah—they will be humbled. Not by enemies. By their own hypocrisy.
8. The Final Warning: Read the Qur’an—Not the News
   More than 99.9999% of people have never read the Qur’an. They say: “I heard,” “Someone told me,” “I was born this way.”
   That is not faith. That is inheritance. That is guesswork. That is shirk in disguise.
   Allah says:
   “Never will the Jews or the Christians be pleased with you, until you follow their faith. Say, ‘Allah’s guidance is the only true guidance.’”
   — Qur’an 2:120
   
   Do not seek their approval. Do not fear their slander. Do not be distracted by their media, their courts, their vetoes, their wars.
   Read the Qur’an. Ponder it. Live it.
   And if they plot against you, defame you, or try to silence you—tell them:
   “Go read the Qur’an. Whatever you say that is not from it is vain. And I will not bother—no matter how skilled you are in lying.”
9. Who Wins?
   Allah says:
   “And Allah is the best of planners.”
   — Qur’an 8:30
   
   The tyrants think they win. The oppressors think they rule. The liars think they deceive.
   But Allah’s soldiers are not only angels. They are the believers who stand firm, who speak truth, who refuse to bow.
   If you are one of them—do not fear. If you are not—do not pretend.
   The truth is here. The choice is yours.

References & Sources

Qur’an verses:
All Qur’anic quotations are from the Saheeh International translation, available at Quran.com and Corpus.Quran.com. Key verses cited: 2:30, 2:120, 2:125, 5:82, 8:30, 8:46, 13:11, 14:42, 21:92, 30:8, 35:6, 60:8.

Armed conflicts data:

• Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP): “Organized violence in 2025: The highest number of active conflicts since WWII” — ucdp.uu.se
• Council on Foreign Relations: “Global Conflict Tracker” — cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker
• International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS): “Armed Conflicts Survey 2025” — iiss.org

Greater Israel plan:

• Theodor Herzl, The Jewish State (1896) and diaries referencing “from the Nile to the Euphrates”
• Rabbi Yehuda Fishman’s 1947 UN testimony — UN Archives
• Israeli government maps and settlement expansion data: Peace Now, B’Tselem
• Biblical reference: Genesis 15:18 (“To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates”)

Nanjing Massacre & Muslims:

• Iris Chang, The Rape of Nanjing (1997) — detailed accounts of Hui Muslim massacres
• Chinese Muslim Historical Society: “The Hui Muslims During the Sino-Japanese War”
• Japanese Imperial Army records: National Archives of Japan
• Testimonies from Nanjing survivors, including Hui community leaders

UN veto power:

• UN Charter, Chapter V, Article 27 — un.org
• Security Council veto usage database: globalpolicy.org
• Historical analysis: “The UN Security Council Veto: A Tool of Power or Justice?” — Cambridge University Press

Japan Supreme Court 2016:

• Supreme Court of Japan, May 2016 ruling on Muslim surveillance — courts.go.jp (Japanese language; English summaries available via Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International)
• Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department correspondence (2025–2026): “Transparency unaccepted” — documented in victim testimonies and legal filings
• Japanese right-wing terrorism cases: Aum Shinrikyo (1995), Tokyo Russian Embassy attack (2025) — National Police Agency of Japan

Author Statement

Speaking truth is not a choice—it is a duty before Allah, even when it is against yourself, your family, your nation, or your own desires. This article is written not to please people, but to fulfill the command of Allah: “O you who believe, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah, even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives.” (Qur’an 4:135)

Every claim made herein is backed by evidence—some thousands of years old, some from today’s headlines. Readers are invited—not challenged—to verify every statement to their core. If you find error, correct it. If you find truth, stand by it. Silence in the face of oppression is complicity.

© 2026. This article is published under Din Allah, not secular copyright law. You are free to share, translate, and distribute it—without alteration—for the sake of truth. Commercial exploitation without permission is prohibited.
Verify everything. Do not take this author’s word. Take Allah’s word. Take historical record. Take documented evidence. Thousands of years of prophecy, pattern, and proof are cited. Check them. Ponder them. Then decide.

Legal Disclaimer (Under Din Allah)

No waiver of rights under Din Allah. This article is protected under the divine law of justice as revealed in the Qur’an and Sunnah. Any attempt to defame, silence, prosecute, or harm the author or distributors of this truth will be considered an act of oppression (dhulm) and will be answered according to the law of Allah—not the backdoor secular laws made by and for the powerful.
Secular courts have no jurisdiction over truth. Justice belongs to Allah alone. Those who plot against this message will find that “Allah is the best of planners.” (Qur’an 8:30)

The Global Hit List: How the West → Israel → Japan & the UN Are Bombing Islam—In Plain Sight was originally published in Mr. Plan ₿ Publication on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Probably because I felt like it was cringe, or I was afraid someone would discover my article and know I’m talking about them. Yeah, someone among my 11 followers.

Well, I can’t deny that it’s a very interesting topic, and I also have come to embrace the fact that I desire to have a life filled with love.

Plus, this blog is all about my journey in life. And my journey with romantic love is part of that, so.

OK, where do we even begin?

I think we should go back to 2023.

It’s August 2023. I just arrived in New York City. It’s hot. I’m sweaty. It’s quite fitting, really, because I feel like the hottest I’ve ever been.

I’ve been dreaming of this moment since the day I moved out of New York. That day was when I was literally 8 years old.

I had worked HARD to get here. Resume editing at 2 am. Networking events where I pushed through the type of social anxiety that courses through your veins. Interview practices that literally made my head go white. Even when COVID-19 hit, the grind continued. The mock interviews, networking, interviews transported themselves from the real world to the online world.

With every practice session, I was apparently getting better. I say “apparently” because although I still felt inadequate, other people told me I wasn’t. I was eloquent, composed, and insightful. It was the result of pushing through sheer anxiety. I had learned to equate pain with progress.

But it was all worth it, because more than anything, I wanted a fancy, high-paying job that would get me back in the city of my dreams. My hometown. Not to mention a title that would speak to my intelligence without me having to prove it.

But I was still missing something.

A boyfriend.

I had my share fair of crushes and cute stories from middle school and high school. But never once had I had a “real” boyfriend. You know, one that actually lasted more than 3 months?

I was determined to find that person in college. After all, everyone says that once you graduate college, you’re pretty much cooked. You can’t really find friends or boyfriends after college.

Here I was, 3 months after graduating USC, still boyfriend-less. But it was OK. Because I was going to find my man in New York City.

Probably at a cute bookstore, a coffee shop, or at work. Because I wanted to meet my man organically.

However, I couldn’t help but notice that everyone else was downloading online dating apps. I already knew that Tinder was not the vibe I was looking for. But Hinge seemed more wholesome. Plus, people were saying it was a good way to make friends. I had to build a new social life in the city, so I decided to give Hinge a shot. (Even though, quite honestly, it scared me. I mean, what if I met a murderer.)

I remember how petrified I was for my first date. Partly because it was a date, partly because I was afraid I’d meet a murderer.

Those nerves, ironically, gave me the bubbly energy I needed to make the date feel more exciting and smooth. Despite the fact that, well, I wasn’t really attracted to the guy. I was actually kind of relieved when he told me he wasn’t looking for anything serious.

I saw him maybe one or two more times, and then told him I felt like I was experiencing a platonic connection with him rather than a romantic one.

One date turned into two, three, four…ten? (I mean with different men, not the same one). I don’t even remember the total number. At one point, I created a notion to record my observations because some random dating advice convinced me it would be a good way to improve my dating skills.

Then, about a year later, I was laid off from my job. I flew to Korea job-less and boyfriend-less.

So by now, I probably had the dating skills. But still, I didn’t have my person. Guess the skills weren’t the issue.

More lessons on love to come.

the notion list of nyc men was originally published in Mr. Plan ₿ Publication on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.