How Gatekeeping Can Drive People Away From a Hobby
When credentials, seniority, or gear become a way to decide who belongs, a hobby can start pushing people away.
Amateur radio has always attracted people who like figuring things out. You hear something interesting, read about it, build or buy something, test it, discover that it does not behave quite the way you expected, then try again.
That is a big part of the appeal for me.
Years ago, I was experimenting with a portable end-fed antenna. I started with an existing design, made the wire a little longer so I had room to adjust it, measured the antenna, tried different configurations, and observed what happened on different bands.
It was ordinary hobby experimentation. I was not claiming to have discovered some new antenna theory.
During one discussion, however, the subject somehow shifted from the antenna to whether I had enough technical education to understand what I was doing. Formal qualifications came up, along with professional credentials and the suggestion that perhaps more schooling was in order before venturing further into these subjects.
I already held an advanced amateur license at the time, although that was hardly the point. A ham license does not make someone an RF engineer. I have been in the hobby for years, and there are still huge areas of radio where I know very little.
What stuck with me was the idea that you were somehow supposed to become sufficiently qualified before being allowed to experiment.
That seems rather backward for a hobby built around experimentation.
Expertise is useful when it is shared
I have tremendous respect for people who know more than I do. Amateur radio has introduced me to engineers, technicians, and longtime operators whose practical knowledge can save someone hours of frustration.
If I misunderstand why an antenna behaves a certain way, tell me. If my setup is unsafe, definitely tell me. If there is a better way to measure something, I would like to know about it.
There is a big difference, though, between sharing expertise and using credentials to establish your place in the hierarchy.
Most of us have probably encountered someone who repeatedly reminds everyone of a degree, profession, license class, number of years in the hobby, CW ability, DX count or some other credential. After a while, the credential itself starts becoming the argument.
That does very little to help somebody learn.
Some of my best experiences in radio have been with people who could explain complicated things without making the person asking feel stupid. Quite often, the people who genuinely know a subject well are also perfectly comfortable saying when they do not know something.
That attitude encourages experimentation.
I have learned plenty from inexpensive radios, compromised antennas, and portable setups precisely because they were imperfect. When something does not work as expected, you start asking why. Sometimes your original assumption was wrong. Sometimes changing the antenna height, location, feedline, or wire length gives you a clue.
Being wrong occasionally is part of learning.
It happens in other hobbies too
Radio is hardly unique.
Get J. Angelo Racoma N2RAC/DU2XXR’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
I see similar behavior around cars. There are enthusiasts who seem to believe that unless you can rebuild an engine yourself, own a particular type of car, or know the correct answer to every obscure mechanical question, you are somehow less entitled to enjoy the hobby.
Computers have their own version. Use the wrong operating system, programming language, or hardware, and somebody will eventually explain why you are doing computing incorrectly.
Prepping can be particularly prone to it. People enter preparedness from very different situations. Someone might start with extra food and water at home. Another person becomes interested in backup power. Someone else studies first aid, communications, or evacuation planning.
Yet there is always somebody ready to declare that you are not a real prepper unless you have a certain amount of supplies, a particular type of property, a long list of equipment, or a lifestyle that may be completely unrealistic for someone living in a city.
That misses the point. Preparedness should make people more resilient than they were yesterday. Turning it into a competition over who has the most complete setup discourages the very people who are just beginning to think about being prepared.
The same is true of amateur radio.
There are legitimate barriers. We operate on regulated spectrum and need the proper licenses and privileges. Electrical safety, RF exposure, and interference are real concerns. Some activities require considerably more knowledge than others.
Those standards are necessary. The unnecessary part is making somebody feel that curiosity itself requires permission.
People do quietly walk away
I think this is where gatekeeping does the most damage.
Not everyone who has an unpleasant encounter starts an argument about it. Most people probably do not announce that they have been discouraged either.
Sometimes they just participate less.
I know I have.
There have been encounters in different hobbies that left a bad taste in my mouth. Rather than continue dealing with certain personalities or communities, I have sometimes looked elsewhere for fulfilment. That might mean finding another group, enjoying the hobby more privately, concentrating on a different part of it, or simply spending more time on another interest for a while.
You probably never see that reflected in membership numbers as a specific case of gatekeeping. Someone merely stops showing up.
Then, years later, people wonder why the hobby/club has trouble attracting new members or why younger people seem uninterested.
There are many reasons for that, of course. But the culture we create around a hobby is one of the things we can actually control.
Amateur radio has a good old word for the alternative: Elmering.
Someone showed us how to do things when we were starting out. Someone tolerated our basic questions. Someone explained why an idea probably would not work, perhaps after letting us try it anyway.
Eventually, if we stay around long enough, we become the person who knows the answer to somebody else’s question.
At that point, we get to decide what to do with it.
For a hobby like amateur radio to keep going, I think the better choice is fairly simple.
Pass it on.
