Sitemap
Served

The words of men and women who have served in the United States military.

Member-only story

U.S. Army Voices

On Sexism, Re-Training As “Punishment” Doesn’t Work

Military Sexism Offenders Need Accountability, Not More PowerPoint Slides

6 min readSep 7, 2024

--

U.S. Army Soldiers standing in formation, with Private Rivera on the corner of the formation in focus. 2016. | Photo Credit: Johnny Silvercloud

Re-training Offenders

“I find SHARP “re-training” as a consequence to be especially repulsive. Here’s why: anyone who has been the army longer than a year has at a minimum been through ONE SHARP training (this is a fact) so to say “they didn’t know” is false and dismissive especially when it’s habitual. I think we (the Army) give offenders way too much credit.

They’re not stupid; they’re predators.

They know that their comments or behavior is wrong but they choose to do it anyway. I understand there are legalities but when the legalities get in the way of giving offenders proper punishment maybe it’s time we re-look them. They do not need “re-training”, they need consequences. They know.” ~ Briana Ruiz, U.S. Army Veteran

For context: “SHARP” is the U.S. Army’s program to prevent sexual harassment and sexual assault. SHARP stands for Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention. Soldiers say SHARP for short. The SHARP program is essentially a training program that attempts to educate the Army population on the full spectrum of sexist issues ranging from…

--

--

Johnny Silvercloud
Johnny Silvercloud

Written by Johnny Silvercloud

20 yr U.S. Army vet turned analytical street photographer who talks about power, protest, and politics. Do not defend racism or sexism when I’m in the room.

Served
Served

Published in Served

The words of men and women who have served in the United States military.