Diks Ancveirs·4h agoDo We Still Need Laws If Judges Can Turn Procedure into a Wall?The rule of law does not collapse when citizens challenge courts. It collapses when courts cease to explain themselves.
Diks Ancveirs·11h agoYears of Legal Education. Yet Who Can Answer a Simple Question?When the public pays for legal expertise, it is entitled to reasons — not merely references to rules.
Diks Ancveirs·1d agoACCOUNTABILITY WITHOUT BORDERSWhat Latvia’s access-to-justice research and an Oregon City accountability project can teach us about institutions that must answer to the…
Ian Seo, Toronto·5d agoRule 1.4, Rule 2.1 and the Rules of ProcedureCan Ontario’s Rules Committees Override the Common Law?
Diks Ancveirs·6d agoTHE COST OF ADMINISTRATIVE NON-RESPONSIVENESSLatvia’s Court Administration, statutory duties, evidence-based accountability and the opportunity cost of public resources
Ian Seo, Toronto·6d agoForm 2.1B and the Reverse OnusColourability and the Limits of Delegated Authority
Diks Ancveirs·Nov 3Is Latvia Ready to Crawl Before an Estonian Creditor?When cross-border debt enforcement becomes a test of the rule of law in both Baltic states
Ian Seo, Toronto·Nov 2O. Reg. 322/24: Form 2.1A and the 2024 Amendments to Rule 2.1An examination of the procedural changes to Form 2.1A under O. Reg. 322/24 and their effect on the initiation of Rule 2.1 proceedings
Lulu Anggriani·Nov 1And so We Scream for the Forest, for the Animals, for the People.A human-rights perspective on Indonesia’s recurring forest and land fires.
Ian Seo, Toronto·Oct 25Case Conference — Jurisdiction and Initiating Rule 2.1Case Management as Adjudication in Ontario Superior Court
