Bill Robinson·Oct 232 + 2 = 4. But so do 3+1, and 0+4. And also 7–3. Or 12–8. Voting Machines and Fraud2 + 2 = 4. But so do 3+1, and 0+4. And also 7–3. Or 12–8. Voting Machines and Fraud
Michael P. Di Fulvio·Jun 10Voting Machines, Smartmatic, Sequoia, Dominion, and the Long Road Back to Public TrustThe Smartmatic indictment does not prove vote manipulation, but it does prove that election technology must be treated as critical…
Cory Doctorow·Apr 18Georgia’s voting technology blunderIt’s possible for Dominion machines to suck, but not in the way that Tucker Carlson says they do.A response icon7
InEvans CutchmorebyKim M. Braud·Feb 2When 700 Boxes Leave the Elections Office, Voters Deserve AnswersAs a Georgia voter, I’m not interested in rumors; I’m interested in process.
Vamsi Krishna Sankarayogi·Oct 24, 2025Why India’s Voting Machines Are (Almost) ImpregnableAn engineer’s deep dive into architecture, threat modeling, and the real meaning of “tamper-proof” in India’s electoral technology.
